Re: Making use of Core 2 features without 64bit addressing

This is great to hear, thanks a lot for the info. Got the build done, just need to test on the Core 2 when I get to work. On Apr 11, 2008, at 1:39 AM, Clark Cox wrote: On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Michael Vannorsdel <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Indeed I can do that. This brings up anot

Re: Making use of Core 2 features without 64bit addressing

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Michael Vannorsdel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Indeed I can do that. This brings up another question; since frameworks and > libs didn't have much 64 bit support in 10.4, is it possible for a fat > binary to load the 64 bit image on 10.5 and 32 bit on 10.4? Perh

Re: Making use of Core 2 features without 64bit addressing

On 4/10/08, Michael Vannorsdel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Indeed I can do that. This brings up another question; since > frameworks and libs didn't have much 64 bit support in 10.4, is it > possible for a fat binary to load the 64 bit image on 10.5 and 32 bit > on 10.4? Perhaps with some Info.p

Re: Making use of Core 2 features without 64bit addressing

Indeed I can do that. This brings up another question; since frameworks and libs didn't have much 64 bit support in 10.4, is it possible for a fat binary to load the 64 bit image on 10.5 and 32 bit on 10.4? Perhaps with some Info.plist settings. My instinct says no; 64 bit image will be

Re: Making use of Core 2 features without 64bit addressing

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Michael Vannorsdel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just an optimized build for core 2 and xeon, but I have to link with 10.4SDK Are you sure that you have to use the 10.4 SDK? Just use the 10.5 SDK, but set the deployment target to 10.4 for your 32-bit architectures.

Re: Making use of Core 2 features without 64bit addressing

On Apr 10, 2008, at 5:00 PM, Michael Vannorsdel wrote: Just an optimized build for core 2 and xeon, but I have to link with 10.4SDK and it has some header bugs when building for 64 bit Intel (mostly from TARGET_CPU_X86 not defined). I don't really need 64 bit addressing but would like to u

Re: Making use of Core 2 features without 64bit addressing

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Michael Vannorsdel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it possible to build a binary that uses the extra registers and features > of x86_64 but without making a 64 bit binary? No. May I ask why you don't want to make a 64-bit binary? -- Clark S. Cox III [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Making use of Core 2 features without 64bit addressing

Just an optimized build for core 2 and xeon, but I have to link with 10.4SDK and it has some header bugs when building for 64 bit Intel (mostly from TARGET_CPU_X86 not defined). I don't really need 64 bit addressing but would like to use the additional registers and 64 bit integer math.

Re: Making use of Core 2 features without 64bit addressing

On Apr 10, 2008, at 4:46 PM, Michael Vannorsdel wrote: Is it possible to build a binary that uses the extra registers and features of x86_64 but without making a 64 bit binary? I'm pretty sure the answer is no. What are you trying to accomplish? Nick Zitzmann _

Making use of Core 2 features without 64bit addressing

Is it possible to build a binary that uses the extra registers and features of x86_64 but without making a 64 bit binary? ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Cont