Re: questions on WebView for Mac apps

> On Sep 30, 2015, at 11:59 AM, Jens Alfke wrote: > > >> On Sep 30, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Conrad Shultz > > wrote: >> >> WKWebVew is the preferred API. >> >> If WKWebView is missing API that prevents you from adopting it (on either >> iOS or OS X) please file a b

Re: questions on WebView for Mac apps

> On 1 Oct 2015, at 16:15, Alex Hall wrote: > > >> On Oct 1, 2015, at 06:49, Marek Hrušovský wrote: >> >> The only thing you have to do is to call a method and add it as subview in >> your code >> - (instancetype)initWithFrame:(CGRect)frame >> configuration:(WKWebViewConfiguration *)configu

Re: questions on WebView for Mac apps

> On Oct 1, 2015, at 06:49, Marek Hrušovský wrote: > > The only thing you have to do is to call a method and add it as subview in > your code > - (instancetype)initWithFrame:(CGRect)frame > configuration:(WKWebViewConfiguration *)configuration > NS_DESIGNATED_INITIALIZER; > > It's max 3 minu

Re: questions on WebView for Mac apps

The only thing you have to do is to call a method and add it as subview in your code - (instancetype)initWithFrame:(CGRect)frame configuration:(WKWebViewConfiguration *)configuration NS_DESIGNATED_INITIALIZER; It's max 3 minutes of work. On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Alex Hall wrote: > > > O

Re: questions on WebView for Mac apps

> On Sep 30, 2015, at 17:35, Charles Srstka wrote: > >> On Sep 30, 2015, at 4:28 PM, Jens Alfke > > wrote: >> >>> On Sep 30, 2015, at 2:20 PM, Alex Hall >> > wrote: >>> >>> Thanks everyone. I'm now using WKWebView, but it's… odd. I see only

Re: questions on WebView for Mac apps

> On Sep 30, 2015, at 2:37 PM, Alex Kac wrote: > > Are you sure you’ve looked at WKWebView in its entirety? I was looking at > converting a UIWebView and WKWebView seems to have 10x MORE API than > UIWebView. Its just sprinkled about in a lot more classes and delegates. This > is a great reso

Re: questions on WebView for Mac apps

Are you sure you’ve looked at WKWebView in its entirety? I was looking at converting a UIWebView and WKWebView seems to have 10x MORE API than UIWebView. Its just sprinkled about in a lot more classes and delegates. This is a great resource: > On Sep 30, 2015,

Re: questions on WebView for Mac apps

> On Sep 30, 2015, at 4:28 PM, Jens Alfke wrote: > >> On Sep 30, 2015, at 2:20 PM, Alex Hall > > wrote: >> >> Thanks everyone. I'm now using WKWebView, but it's… odd. I see only WebView >> in the object library in Xcode, no WKWebView at all. Just because, I changed >

Re: questions on WebView for Mac apps

On Sep 30, 2015, at 2:20 PM, Alex Hall wrote: > > Thanks everyone. I'm now using WKWebView, but it's… odd. I see only WebView > in the object library in Xcode, no WKWebView at all. No WKWebView in IB. You have to build your view in code. At least it was that way last time I checked. _

Re: questions on WebView for Mac apps

> On Sep 30, 2015, at 2:20 PM, Alex Hall wrote: > > Thanks everyone. I'm now using WKWebView, but it's… odd. I see only WebView > in the object library in Xcode, no WKWebView at all. Just because, I changed > the class of a WebView object to WKWebView, but am now seeing my app launch, > becom

Re: questions on WebView for Mac apps

On Sep 30, 2015, at 12:43 PM, Conrad Shultz wrote: > > WKWebVew is the preferred API. > > If WKWebView is missing API that prevents you from adopting it (on either iOS > or OS X) please file a bug at https://bugreport.apple.com > . WKWebView doesn’t seem to have

Re: questions on WebView for Mac apps

Thanks everyone. I'm now using WKWebView, but it's… odd. I see only WebView in the object library in Xcode, no WKWebView at all. Just because, I changed the class of a WebView object to WKWebView, but am now seeing my app launch, become unresponsive, and never actually do anything. The only erro

Re: questions on WebView for Mac apps

> On Sep 30, 2015, at 10:43 AM, Conrad Shultz wrote: > > WKWebVew is the preferred API. > > If WKWebView is missing API that prevents you from adopting it (on either iOS > or OS X) please file a bug at https://bugreport.apple.com > . Really? WKWebView has like ¼

Re: questions on WebView for Mac apps

WKWebVew is the preferred API. If WKWebView is missing API that prevents you from adopting it (on either iOS or OS X) please file a bug at https://bugreport.apple.com . -Conrad ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists

Re: questions on WebView for Mac apps

> On Sep 30, 2015, at 3:12 PM, Jens Alfke wrote: > > Hey, if I liked working with JavaScript DOM APIs I’d be a web developer :-p > I prefer languages with fancy features, like warning me if I pass the wrong > number of parameters to a function. At build time, even. No disagreement here. None

Re: questions on WebView for Mac apps

> On Sep 29, 2015, at 10:35 PM, dangerwillrobinsondan...@gmail.com wrote: > > Then you realize it's a performance and security thing and it's pretty much > the same as the Safari Extensions API . Web views in WKWebView are actually a > separate process pool you don't own. > So you can translat

Re: questions on WebView for Mac apps

The lack of native DOM API is the head scratcher at first. It leaves you with a message passing API to use the JSContext Objective-C JavaScript API. Then you realize it's a performance and security thing and it's pretty much the same as the Safari Extensions API . Web views in WKWebView are ac

Re: questions on WebView for Mac apps

> On Sep 29, 2015, at 8:15 PM, Roland King wrote: > > is WebView the go-to guy these days or is it WKWebView, which comes with all > the things you love about the Safari browsing experience built-in? That seems > pretty easy to use. There was a WWDC video on it if I remember correctly. WKWeb

Re: questions on WebView for Mac apps

> On 30 Sep 2015, at 10:03, Alex Hall wrote: > > Hello all, > My project is coming along. I'm now to the point where I want to load data > from a URL into a WebView, but there's surprisingly little (read: next to > nothing) about doing this in an app on the Mac. That or I'm googling the > wro

Re: questions on WebView for Mac apps

> On Sep 29, 2015, at 7:03 PM, Alex Hall wrote: > > 1. What class do I want to use when making an outlet for my web view UI > element? Don’t use a custom object. There should be a WebView item in the Interface Builder object palette already. > but "WebView" gives me an error: "use of undecla

questions on WebView for Mac apps

Hello all, My project is coming along. I'm now to the point where I want to load data from a URL into a WebView, but there's surprisingly little (read: next to nothing) about doing this in an app on the Mac. That or I'm googling the wrong terms. Anyway, what I'm running into are the following:

Re: Core Data sync between iOS and Mac apps

On Tue, May 12, 2015, at 10:35 AM, Jens Alfke wrote: > You can still handle conflicts using Dropbox, it’s just trickier. You’ll > need to detect the renamed version of the file that Dropbox creates — > something like “MyAppData (Jens Alfke's conflicted copy 2015-05-09).db” — > then open both files

Re: Core Data sync between iOS and Mac apps

> On May 12, 2015, at 6:00 AM, davel...@mac.com wrote: > > I’m not sure I understand your concerns about Dropbox. The app is single user > so when the iOS enters the background, I can upload the data (if there’s a > network connection at the moment) for modified files to Dropbox. A single-user

Re: Core Data sync between iOS and Mac apps

are in the cloud. > > > > These guides are a good starting point: > > Document Based App Programming Guide for Mac > > Document Based App Programming Guide for iOS > > iCloud Design Guide > > iCloud Programming Guide For Core Data > > > > Thanks, >

Re: Core Data sync between iOS and Mac apps

> On May 10, 2015, at 6:16 AM, davel...@mac.com wrote: > > Also thanks to Jens Alfke for his reply about Couchbase Lite > (http://www.couchbase.com/nosql-databases/couchbase-mobile). I may look into > it but after skimming the site, I couldn't tell exactly what I would need > (i.e., would I ne

Re: Core Data sync between iOS and Mac apps

ng Guide for iOS > > iCloud Design Guide > > iCloud Programming Guide For Core Data > > > > Thanks, > > Mike Swan > > ETCP Certified Entertainment Electrician > > 347-451-5418 > > theMikeSwan.com > > > >> On May 5, 2015, at 8:54 PM

Re: Core Data sync between iOS and Mac apps

gramming Guide for iOS > iCloud Design Guide > iCloud Programming Guide For Core Data > > Thanks, > Mike Swan > ETCP Certified Entertainment Electrician > 347-451-5418 > theMikeSwan.com > >> On May 5, 2015, at 8:54 PM, cocoa-dev-requ...@lists.apple.com wrote: >&

Re: Core Data sync between iOS and Mac apps

On Thu, 7 May 2015 10:57:05 -0400, Michael Swan said: >On OS X NSPersistentDocument can only make flat files, not packages like >UIManagedDocument (I've filed a bug about there being no counterpart to >UIManagedDocument for OS X, been open for over a year now…). Only a year? Mine's been open for

Re: Core Data sync between iOS and Mac apps

t; > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 17:31:23 -0400 > From: davel...@mac.com > To: CocoaDev > Subject: Core Data sync between iOS and Mac apps > Message-ID: <7feb2ad4-ecec-4562-ae17-1cc1e1b73...@mac.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > >

Re: Core Data sync between iOS and Mac apps

> On May 5, 2015, at 2:31 PM, davel...@mac.com wrote: > > I'm looking into options for building an iOS and Mac app that can sync/share > Core Data between them. I'm well aware of the issues with Core Data iCloud > syncing in iOS 5 and 6 and that it is supposedly better so I'm willing to try >

Core Data sync between iOS and Mac apps

I'm looking into options for building an iOS and Mac app that can sync/share Core Data between them. I'm well aware of the issues with Core Data iCloud syncing in iOS 5 and 6 and that it is supposedly better so I'm willing to try it. The apps can have deployment targets of iOS 8 and greater and

How to share a temp file between Mac apps

I have an app (App1) that creates a temp file that then needs to be opened in another app (App2), which the first app launches using NSTask with several arguments, one of which is the temp file created by App1. To create the temp file name and path I use the following snippet: NSString *

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

Alex, I think my favorite part of your response is that, what I said wasn't something to be vaguely recalled, a lost moment enveloped in a foggy memory, a fragment of a conversation hopelessly swallowed by the past. There was no reason to settle for remembering "something to the effect of" it. On

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

On May 8, 2013, at 7:25 PM, Alex Zavatone wrote: > On May 8, 2013, at 8:17 PM, Luther Baker wrote: > >> Steve's entire thread was about giving away his source code -- he even keeps >> us up to date as it starts to leave his hands ... and you read "snippy" into >> that last comment? ... and the

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

Alex, does this mean you aren't gonna buy me a PaintCode license out of gratitude? Dang. :( On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Alex Zavatone wrote: > > On May 8, 2013, at 8:17 PM, Luther Baker wrote: > >> Steve's entire thread was about giving away his source code -- he even keeps >> us up to date

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

On May 8, 2013, at 8:17 PM, Luther Baker wrote: > Steve's entire thread was about giving away his source code -- he even keeps > us up to date as it starts to leave his hands ... and you read "snippy" into > that last comment? ... and then decide to publicly call him out on it? Yes. Because I

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

Steve's entire thread was about giving away his source code -- he even keeps us up to date as it starts to leave his hands ... and you read "snippy" into that last comment? ... and then decide to publicly call him out on it? I really don't understand how you got "snippy" out of that comment but yo

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

On May 8, 2013, at 1:14 AM, Steven Degutis wrote: > It's funny how when you say "in order of" but omit the direction, > people have different assumptions: > https://github.com/biohazardffm/grs/network/members > > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Steven Degutis wrote: >> Update: >> >> The origin

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

This: If none of them exist by the time you read this, well then sorry. At least you'll have learned sooner than later that permanence is an illusion. -Steven On May 8, 2013, at 10:56 AM, Steven Degutis wrote: > Snippy? I'm having a hard time figuring out which part could be snippy. > > The pa

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

Snippy? I'm having a hard time figuring out which part could be snippy. The part about the different interpretations of the sort order of the list of forks? I just found it a neat observation and wanted to share. The part about people deleting their own forks? Just wanted to warn people that they

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

hen sorry. At > least you'll have learned sooner than later that permanence is an > illusion. > > -Steven > > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Steven Degutis wrote: >> These ones: https://github.com/sdegutis/grs >> >> They're a lovely little set of Mac app

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

One more thing: If you end up doing something cool with any of these apps, please let me know. I'm kinda nerdy so I like hearing about that kinda stuff. On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Steven Degutis wrote: > These ones: https://github.com/sdegutis/grs > > They're a lovel

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

you'll have learned sooner than later that permanence is an illusion. -Steven On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Steven Degutis wrote: > These ones: https://github.com/sdegutis/grs > > They're a lovely little set of Mac apps. Most of them are on the App > Store, and with a

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

ke one. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 7, 2013, at 9:54 AM, Steven Degutis wrote: > >> These ones: https://github.com/sdegutis/grs >> >> They're a lovely little set of Mac apps. Most of them are on the App >> Store, and with absolutely no marketi

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

om/sdegutis/grs >> >> They're a lovely little set of Mac apps. Most of them are on the App >> Store, and with absolutely no marketing they've been making about $42 >> per month. I'm sure with marketing they'll do much better. >> >> This re

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

Also, sorry about the unfinished sentence at the end, it happened because On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Steven Degutis wrote: > These ones: https://github.com/sdegutis/grs > > They're a lovely little set of Mac apps. Most of them are on the App > Store, and with absolutely no

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

. The read me in the link has their names. See > what people think of em. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 7, 2013, at 6:54 AM, Steven Degutis wrote: > >> These ones: https://github.com/sdegutis/grs >> >> They're a lovely little set of Mac apps. Mos

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

t;> do whatever you want with them. I'm releasing all of that repo under >> the MIT license. Give them away for free, sell them, whatever, I don't >> care. >> >> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Steven Degutis wrote: >>> These ones: https://github.c

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

sdegutis/grs > > They're a lovely little set of Mac apps. Most of them are on the App > Store, and with absolutely no marketing they've been making about $42 > per month. I'm sure with marketing they'll do much better. > > This repo also includes AppGrid, which

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

Ok. On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Tom von Schwerdtner wrote: > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Steven Degutis wrote: >> >> These ones: https://github.com/sdegutis/grs >> >> (...) >> >> For the curious, I'm giving them away because >> > > I think something got cut off here...? > > -Tom

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Steven Degutis wrote: > > These ones: https://github.com/sdegutis/grs > > (...) > > For the curious, I'm giving them away because > I think something got cut off here...? -Tom ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

t with them. I'm releasing all of that repo under > the MIT license. Give them away for free, sell them, whatever, I don't > care. > > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Steven Degutis wrote: >> These ones: https://github.com/sdegutis/grs >> >> They're a lo

Re: Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

e ones: https://github.com/sdegutis/grs > > They're a lovely little set of Mac apps. Most of them are on the App > Store, and with absolutely no marketing they've been making about $42 > per month. I'm sure with marketing they'll do much better. > > This repo also in

Wanted: new owner for Mac apps

These ones: https://github.com/sdegutis/grs They're a lovely little set of Mac apps. Most of them are on the App Store, and with absolutely no marketing they've been making about $42 per month. I'm sure with marketing they'll do much better. This repo also includes AppGrid, w

Re: [Moderator] Re: Mac Apps

On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Scott Anguish wrote: > > On Dec 24, 2010, at 1:10 PM, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote: > >> I hope this helps, more than "No soup for you!!!” > > I certainly didn’t mean no soup for you. Godwin! sherm-- -- Cocoa programming in Perl: http://camelbones.sourceforge.net _

Re: [Moderator] Re: Mac Apps

e. > > > > From: sc...@cocoadoc.com > > Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:33:22 -0500 > > To: k...@highrolls.net > > CC: cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com > > Subject: [Moderator] Re: Mac Apps > > > > This isn’t the proper forum to get that question answe

[Moderator] Re: Mac Apps

This isn’t the proper forum to get that question answered. d...@apple.com perhaps devforums.apple.com On Dec 23, 2010, at 7:30 PM, k...@highrolls.net wrote: > What say you any Apple lurkers is James and me right in our assumption or do > I have to pay the $99 to find out if I want to pay the

Re: Mac Apps

or about 26 years in various forms. The 'Mac App Store' is a new web-based delivery system for Mac apps from Apple, and to be eligible the Mac app must be signed and meet a number of other requirements (to find these out you have to stump up the $99). However, being written in Cocoa

Re: Mac Apps

What say you any Apple lurkers is James and me right in our assumption or do I have to pay the $99 to find out if I want to pay the $99? -koko On Dec 23, 2010, at 3:45 PM, James West wrote: Presumably, yes. With the added bonus of app store distribution. - James On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:

Re: Mac Apps

Presumably, yes. With the added bonus of app store distribution. - James On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 3:57 PM, wrote: > I haven't thrown in my $99 yet so I cannot get the details on a 'Mac App'. > > Is a Mac App just a Cocoa app that is signed? > > -koko > > _

Mac Apps

I haven't thrown in my $99 yet so I cannot get the details on a 'Mac App'. Is a Mac App just a Cocoa app that is signed? -koko ___ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the li