Re: Core Data: Primitive Accessors & Ivar-Backed Properties

2013-09-18 Thread Mike Abdullah
On 18 Sep 2013, at 16:45, Keary Suska wrote: > On Sep 17, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Keary Suska wrote: > >> I hadn't considered the undo issue--I guess I just thought undo support was >> "automagical". If not, are you aware of whether it is implemented at the >> public or primitive accessor level? No

Re: Core Data: Primitive Accessors & Ivar-Backed Properties

2013-09-18 Thread Keary Suska
On Sep 17, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Keary Suska wrote: > I hadn't considered the undo issue--I guess I just thought undo support was > "automagical". If not, are you aware of whether it is implemented at the > public or primitive accessor level? None of the doc examples I have seen do > any undo handl

Re: Core Data: Primitive Accessors & Ivar-Backed Properties

2013-09-17 Thread Alex Finkel
Have a look at MOGenerator. I have used it for every iOS project with great success. It will give you what you need. On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Keary Suska wrote: > Does anyone know whether it is useful to implement primitive > accessors for scalar attributes modeled with standard attrib

Re: Core Data: Primitive Accessors & Ivar-Backed Properties

2013-09-17 Thread Sean McBride
On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:52:05 -0600, Keary Suska said: >I appreciate the feedback--I am more looking for general feedback by >fellow developers about either canonical forms or useful conventions in >situations where using an ivar-backed attribute is determined to be >useful, rather than to address

Re: Core Data: Primitive Accessors & Ivar-Backed Properties

2013-09-17 Thread Keary Suska
On Sep 17, 2013, at 10:06 AM, Alex Finkel wrote: > Have a look at MOGenerator. I have used it for every iOS project with great > success. It will give you what you need. I appreciate the feedback--I am more looking for general feedback by fellow developers about either canonical forms or usef

Re: Core Data: Primitive Accessors & Ivar-Backed Properties

2013-09-17 Thread Keary Suska
On Sep 17, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Sean McBride wrote: > On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:52:05 -0600, Keary Suska said: > >> I appreciate the feedback--I am more looking for general feedback by >> fellow developers about either canonical forms or useful conventions in >> situations where using an ivar-backed at

Core Data: Primitive Accessors & Ivar-Backed Properties

2013-09-15 Thread Keary Suska
Does anyone know whether it is useful to implement primitive accessors for scalar attributes modeled with standard attribute types that are backed by ivars? The docs show both approaches (with/without) but don't show why the difference, although I am inclined to think it is just a documentation