>> Fair enough.
>> I guess that brings this discussion to a close, so thanks to
>> everyone who
>> responded. It's been very valuable to me, even if it didn't go in the
>> direction I was hoping. It's certainly convinced me that our
>> toolbar needs
>> to go, although what we replace it with, I h
On 08/02/2009, at 1:16 PM, Seth Willits wrote:
Fair enough.
I guess that brings this discussion to a close, so thanks to
everyone who
responded. It's been very valuable to me, even if it didn't go in
the
direction I was hoping. It's certainly convinced me that our
toolbar needs
to go, a
On Feb 7, 2009, at 2:40 PM, Christian Graus wrote:
Fair enough.
I guess that brings this discussion to a close, so thanks to
everyone who
responded. It's been very valuable to me, even if it didn't go in the
direction I was hoping. It's certainly convinced me that our
toolbar needs
to go,
Fair enough.
I guess that brings this discussion to a close, so thanks to everyone who
responded. It's been very valuable to me, even if it didn't go in the
direction I was hoping. It's certainly convinced me that our toolbar needs
to go, although what we replace it with, I have no idea at this s
On Feb 7, 2009, at 3:11 AM, Christian Graus wrote:
Well, our prospective Mac users are all in a niche market, they have
all
seen the marketing for our windows version, and most of them are
actually
*using* our windows version. So, they WILL be aware of our windows
version,
they ARE using
In short, applications that are ported to the platform with the
express intent of maintaining their look and feel from Windows do
little more than treat OS X users as second-class citizens. No one
likes paying money for that feeling so at the end of the day, I doubt
the port will see even remote s
On Feb 7, 2009, at 1:53 AM, Graham Cox wrote:
I don't see us using a standard toolbar, our big fear will be that
we don't want to lose the pizzaz we have under Windows and have a
bog standard looking Mac app, it will just look like a poor cousin
of our windows app then.
It. Doesn't. Matt
Well, our prospective Mac users are all in a niche market, they have all
seen the marketing for our windows version, and most of them are actually
*using* our windows version. So, they WILL be aware of our windows version,
they ARE using the Windows version and waiting for the Mac version, and whe
On 7 Feb 2009, at 8:46 pm, Christian Graus wrote:
I don't see us using a standard toolbar, our big fear will be that
we don't want to lose the pizzaz we have under Windows and have a
bog standard looking Mac app, it will just look like a poor cousin
of our windows app then.
It. Doesn't
ating,
animated toolbar is shown. I don't see us using a standard toolbar, our big
fear will be that we don't want to lose the pizzaz we have under Windows and
have a bog standard looking Mac app, it will just look like a poor cousin of
our windows app then. But, talking to Kyle today ha
In short, applications that are ported to the platform with the
express intent of maintaining their look and feel from Windows do
little more than treat OS X users as second-class citizens. No one
likes paying money for that feeling so at the end of the day, I doubt
the port will see even
On 7 Feb 2009, at 8:43 am, Christian Graus wrote:
In my app, I want a toolbar like the one at the bottom of OSX, with
icons
that resize as I move the mouse over them. I want the whole toolbar
to hide
and to scroll up into view from the bottom of my window when I move
my mouse
over the li
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Christian Graus
> wrote:
> > We prefer users to use our app full screen. we're copying our Windows
> > program, so we really don't have a lot of room to rethink this stuff, and
> > what we've done so far, was a
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Christian Graus
wrote:
> We prefer users to use our app full screen. we're copying our Windows
> program, so we really don't have a lot of room to rethink this stuff, and
> what we've done so far, was a success in the windows world. I am trying to
> make sure we m
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Christian Graus
> wrote:
> > In my app, I want a toolbar like the one at the bottom of OSX, with icons
> > that resize as I move the mouse over them.
>
> The user interface element you're referring to is called
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Christian Graus
wrote:
> In my app, I want a toolbar like the one at the bottom of OSX, with icons
> that resize as I move the mouse over them.
The user interface element you're referring to is called the Dock.
> I want the whole toolbar to hide
> and to scroll up
Hi again
In my app, I want a toolbar like the one at the bottom of OSX, with icons
that resize as I move the mouse over them. I want the whole toolbar to hide
and to scroll up into view from the bottom of my window when I move my mouse
over the little edge that would be always visible. I've been
17 matches
Mail list logo
