On 12 Jan 2015, at 02:48, Marco S Hyman wrote:
>> My question is in two parts:
>
> See https://github.com/libressl-portable/portable
>
> "The resulting library and 'openssl' utility is largely API-compatible with
> OpenSSL 1.0.1. However, it is not ABI compatible - you will need to relink
> you
> My question is in two parts:
See https://github.com/libressl-portable/portable
"The resulting library and 'openssl' utility is largely API-compatible with
OpenSSL 1.0.1. However, it is not ABI compatible - you will need to relink your
programs to LibreSSL in order to use it, just as in moving f
On Jan 11, 2015, at 15:07 , Uli Kusterer wrote:
>
> Short caveat: Do not get the actual OpenSSL. Get LibreSSL
Jumping to a new thread here, since I’m going OT for the original thread. But I
have an actual question at the end.
I wondered about this issue just yesterday, looking at th
