On Aug 23, 2016, at 8:52 AM, Andreas Falkenhahn wrote:
>
> I really can't use NSApplicationMain() because AFAICS it also expects
> to load a NIB file from the app bundle
The nib to load at startup is specified in the plist, I bet if you leave that
entry out, it won't try
retty severe trap for the unaware. (Especially the part
where multiples of 256 can become == NO...)
When it's a proper C99'ish bool, then all values are cast to bool at
assignment, and so it is always == either 0 or 1.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://
On Sep 28, 2015, at 6:24 PM, Quincey Morris
wrote:
>
> On Sep 28, 2015, at 17:14 , Scott Ribe wrote:
>>
>> "Assigning block literal to a weak variable; object will be released after
>> assignment"
>
> Well, you wouldn’t assign a literal there. You
when working on it; that sounds like a good suggestion,
BUT:
"Assigning block literal to a weak variable; object will be released after
assignment"
:-P
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
(303) 722-0567 voice
On Sep 27, 2015, at 7:51 PM, Scott Ribe wrote:
>
> On Sep 27, 2015, at 7:03 PM, Quincey Morris
> wrote:
>>
>> IIRC you can simply assign ‘self’ to a local variable just before assigning
>> to ‘fun', and use the local variable name instead of ‘self’ inside
On Sep 27, 2015, at 7:03 PM, Quincey Morris
wrote:
>
> IIRC you can simply assign ‘self’ to a local variable just before assigning
> to ‘fun', and use the local variable name instead of ‘self’ inside the block.
Well, that does work. Thanks!
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevate
So how to get rid of the warning?
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin r
rying about correct synchronization of that polling.)
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Pleas
then yielding at key points, as in the old
days of cooperative multi-processing, have way more problems than multiple
threads.
If you have computation that needs to keep running without blocking menu
tracking and other event handling, you need to put it on its own thread, period.
--
S
On Sep 26, 2015, at 11:55 AM, Programmingkid wrote:
>
> I think the reasoning for this is the user interface is expected to be
> responsive and if other processes are running, then the interface will be
> sluggish.
That *WAS* the reasoning, in 1984 ;-)
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r
cessing even with the
> mouse down?
If the application is already processing on the main thread, clicking on a menu
will not interrupt it. The menu just won't display & track until the main
thread is idle.
Processing on any other thread will not affect menu tracking, and vice versa.
missed, and is
dealloc'ing something early.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not pos
down in a very specific order.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin request
ng back gradually. And of course if it does leak with
no code, you're ready to file a bug report and/or open a DTS incident.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
(303) 722-0567 voice
__
e what happens to memory usage ;-)
Also, you are aware that you can get the full stack trace for any allocation,
right? (You may have to set an option in the instrument before you start the
run, I don't remember.)
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev
if there's any Cocoa or CF equivalent.
Sorry for the confusion, this is actually something I've gotten backwards
before. I've written the code for the child to monitor for the parent's exit,
yet I still forget that it's necessary. Go figure...
--
Scott Ribe
main() {while(1) sleep(1);}
Use NSTask to launch it. Kill your parent in various ways and verify that the
child gets killed: kill -9, call abort, crash it with the time-honored
*(char*)0 = 0.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scot
On Aug 12, 2015, at 4:12 AM, Gerriet M. Denkmann wrote:
>
> This code produces some (for me) unexpected results:
% is remainder NOT modulus. Unfortunately early editions of K&R had it
misnamed, and that has stuck despite that error having been corrected well over
20 years ago.
--
On Aug 4, 2015, at 8:37 AM, Scott Ribe wrote:
>
> I am correct that it is currently not possible to submit a 64-bit-only build
> to the App Store?
>
> Kind of a Catch-22; I have no 32-bit devices here anymore, and the simulator
> in current Xcode doesn't offer them. I
32&64???
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator
DOCUMENTED* to do that, but it doesn't ;-)
Of course the rest of your post, about not depending on it, would be valid even
if it worked...
This is a definite FUGGEDABOUTIT situation.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe
s-advertised/>
TL;DR, here you go:
BOOL AfxIsValidAddress(const void *p, size_t nBytes) {
return p != NULL;
}
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
On Jun 29, 2015, at 2:50 PM, Gavin Eadie wrote:
>
> The main thread is not involved in the above, but the idea of an
> “asynchronous-that-waits” == “apparently synchronous” call is demonstrated.
That's simply not asynchronous.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http:
ion that both waits and does not wait. Sorry, but it's
time to open that box and see if the damned cat is dead or not ;-)
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
(303) 722-0567 voice
_
like program behavior that is poorly specified.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do no
rforming the work on a background
thread, then using some callback to execute the "after" code when it's
done--which is what you should be doing.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in
#x27;s just my personal style, that I refuse to
define it to anything other than 1, because why should I have to remember that
NDEBUG=0 also turns it *on*? As does NDEBUG?
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
(303)
people build up all sorts of ASSERT macros of their own, with all sorts of
config options...
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev ma
On Jun 17, 2015, at 2:04 PM, Jens Alfke wrote:
>
> Guys, talking about Swift vs. Obj-C/C/C++ has a slight amount of use, but if
> we start dragging everyone’s pet language into the fray (Algol? Burroughs
> B5000 assembly?)
Dylan, dammit ;-)
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-
es.localStorage = true
>
> I get a "WebPreferences does not have a member named ..." error.
>
> How can I do it?
>
> Thanks in advance,
I don't know Swift, nor much about WebViews, but I'd guess it's because you got
the member name wrong. Try localStorag
On Jun 3, 2015, at 6:30 AM, Alex Zavatone wrote:
>
> With that in mind, what should it have depended on instead?
His point was not that such dependence was bad, nor even avoidable. His point
was that the C++ was a steaming pile ;-)
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.co
On Jun 1, 2015, at 10:43 PM, Britt Durbrow
wrote:
>
> So…. it looks like clang at least is doing the right thing and calling the
> destructor when the variable goes out of scope.
Yep. But I believe with goto you can skip over a constructor--but at least you
get a warning.
--
S
ble in if expressions
etc, but that seems like overkill here, since you would always run this on its
own at the top of a block.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
(303) 722-0
On May 29, 2015, at 12:17 PM, Alex Zavatone wrote:
>
> Typing == by habit. My mistake.
Ah, *NOW* the conversation makes sense ;-)
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
(303) 722-0567
On May 29, 2015, at 11:49 AM, Alex Zavatone wrote:
>
> Would this handle it properly?
>
> if (!(self = [super init])) {
>return nil;
> }
Yes.
> if (!(self == [super init]))
No. But not sure whether you were asking about that or not…
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@
of
> older Xcode versions’ codegen.
I’m pretty sure that a window and it’s views should not be trying to redraw
after being closed…
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
(303)
now if Xcode 5 can run on Yosemite), or
> drop 10.6 support. My decision was to do the latter; Snow Leopard is four
> years old now. Time to move on.
Well now, if this isn’t totally strange. I’m starting to see this problem
*after* switching to Xcode 6.2 and switching my
DEADBEEF is what some memory debugging utilities write over memory it's freed.
If it’s showing in your isa pointer, then you’re accessing an object which has
been dealloc’d.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
(303
On May 15, 2015, at 11:06 AM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
>
> It's not valid to dereference a null pointer, but what happens when you
> do is undefined.
As in the olden days of OS 9 & before, when you could freely read & write
through location 0, usually leading to great hil
On Apr 22, 2015, at 10:10 AM, Dave wrote:
>
> I really can’t understand why it was ever defined to be bottom left, does
> anyone know why?
Normal Cartesian coordinates. (I agree the other way made sense, measuring from
the menu bar…)
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev
op of
> the bottom view than at the top of the window.)
I do it too. Be warned, starting with Mavericks things went wacko-batshit
stupid if the sheet is near the screen bounds...
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/
On Mar 17, 2015, at 4:26 PM, JongAm Park wrote:
>
> Then can the number of samples be interpreted as how long it took there...
It can be taken as a very rough approximation of that.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567
Brain farts happen...
> On Feb 18, 2015, at 11:58 AM, Alex Zavatone wrote:
>
> Well, stupid me. You can't have a BOOL with a nil value. Thanks Scott.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303)
On Feb 18, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Alex Zavatone wrote:
>
> In creating an autoDescription method for objects, it's important to know if
> our BOOLs are NO or nil.
???
It's a char, not a pointer, simply an integer type. Nil is 0, NO is 0, assign 0
to an integer, you have
On Feb 10, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Graham Cox wrote:
>
> If others are seeing this effect I'll file a bug, otherwise I'll just have to
> put it down to something weird on my system.
I'm not seeing it all all in the Finder, and haven't noticed it elsewhere.
--
Scott Rib
d
provides helpers to assist with the protocol details and hand your data back to
you.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please
rd-party kexts and/or any frameworks loaded that did
not come from you or Apple.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do
On Nov 25, 2014, at 1:26 AM, Markus Spoettl wrote:
>
> My user says he doesn't experience sluggishness, he also tried rebooting the
> machine and repair the disk permissions. Still crashes reliably every time.
In that case, I'd personally suspect heap corruption.
--
a few things for you to
possibly find out: is there a lot of file manipulation being done on that Mac,
is performance of everything sluggish before this happens, and will it work
after a reboot.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.eleva
t to open a document, it would not even open that document. All of
which is no longer true, so at least MS straightened out that little bit of
dementia.)
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
leaks. And so on. So periodically (+ whenever
it stops responding) I quit Word, copy preferences files from cached copies I
keep that are set the way I want, and relaunch it.
So, any way to for certain replace prefs with a know good set previously saved?
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
*Finder.app*
is spewing, and just imagine them pulling the trigger on this.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin
On Nov 7, 2014, at 8:34 AM, David Wood wrote:
>
> Only now does it occur to me that the place to post this would have been a
> Swift-dev mailing list. Is that even a thing?
No, use of Swift is so intimately tied to Cocoa that they're having those
discussions here.
--
Scot
der in
> which things are called before main is called.
The runtime is up. But of course, no run loop, no event handling.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (
On Oct 22, 2014, at 3:45 PM, Beinan Li wrote:
>
> stop reason = signal SIGABRT
When there's a SIGABRT, there's usually an error logged. You should look for
that, because it might give a good clue.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303
was the
appropriate one here...
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contac
On Oct 22, 2014, at 12:19 PM, Jonathan Mitchell wrote:
>
> Surely the code that returns the object pointed to by temp has to ensure that
> the object has been correctly retained?
So, maybe __autorelease?
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303)
of those compiler incantations with attributes to inform ARC
(__unsafe_unretained?)
- some kind of kludge to fool ARC
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@
On Oct 22, 2014, at 11:46 AM, Gerriet M. Denkmann wrote:
>
> But how to fix this?
Can you actually retain a pointer that ARC expects to be already retained, or
would be it a NOOP?
Sorry, I only use manual memory management, so my previous reply may have been
off-base.
--
Scott Ribe
s
ent threads. Caution, and the occasional "special technique", are
required.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do no
Sorry, duh, you wire it up to "First Responder".
On Oct 19, 2014, at 8:47 AM, Scott Ribe wrote:
> You don't need to wire that up in IB. You just need to implement the action
> in your window controller.
>
> On Oct 19, 2014, at 8:36 AM, Luther Baker wrote:
>
>
list.
> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com
>
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/scott_ribe%40elevated-dev.com
>
> This email sent to scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@e
would require you
to set some flag before changing a control's state, so that the event handler
for that event would know *not* to propagate changes.
It would be an absolute nightmare to code to begin with, and even worse to
maintain...
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
ht
p embeds an Automator action, not quite the same as embedding a
framework, but similar in that there's a code resource with its own signature.)
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-
into our model.
You missed his point. Kerning can be much more complicated than what can be
expressed in that kind of table. So Kyle's question is: what are you trying to
accomplish with that table?
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
On Oct 11, 2014, at 7:36 AM, Scott Ribe wrote:
> On Oct 11, 2014, at 2:04 AM, Gerriet M. Denkmann wrote:
>
>> Note: converting to double does NOT loose any digits.
>
> Well, it has to. Not sure how you're getting that output, but a double has 52
> bits for th
e less likely I am to replace my home-grown task
queues with the "modern" built-in stuff.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com
ysical CPUs)/2 and (number of logical CPUs)x2.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to
ty little lamb she had"
vs
@"mary had a big lamb, a little fella of a lamb she had for sure"
There is no simple definition of "the difference between two strings", and I
don't think it's a basic need at all.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http
on whether or not you're running under the
debugger, I didn't check. I figured out my bug and fixed it before I got to
that point ;-)
But basically, this is now a royal PITA to debug, because there does not seem
to be ANY way to externally confirm what your program has written into t
; identifier, similarly to -launchAppWithBundleIdentifier:.
I'd missed URLForApplicationWithBundleIdentifier in the docs. That's exactly
what I need. In fact, if I have the URL, I don't even need the
NSRunningApplication, so one way or or the other, that will do it for me.
--
Sco
in the debugger, get the list of apps, and it's not listed.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin re
o return an NSRunningApplication* or nil,
instead of BOOL...
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or mod
will stay
> highlighted for 30s and after that it will give an error dialog:
Yeah, you're in the run loop handling the menu event when you send an event to
yourself, which will not be received until your code finishes so the run loop
can get the event and dispatch it--deadlock.
--
Scott Ribe
sc
en it before
Then at launch you can always check the location where you put temp paths, to
see if there's any cleanup that was missed previously.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
uncation was undefined for division with
negative integers, but C99 fixed that.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not
n is precise and covers that case, and some programming
languages just do not implement it.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please d
cross vast numbers of web
sites. K&R C stated that the direction of truncation and sign of result were
machine-dependent for negative operands. The C99 standard tightened that up,
making % into a well-specified remainder operator.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://w
etter if people would learn to quit
incorrectly referring to % as mod, but I guess that ship has sailed (all the
way off the edge of the earth, actually)...
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
__
server,
> so those caching issues should be less of a problem.
10.6? 10.7? It was unreliable enough that I gave up long ago, before 10.8 &
10.9. So it may very well work just fine if you don't need to support older OS
versions.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.e
On Aug 4, 2014, at 11:47 AM, Uli Kusterer wrote:
> You can have a domain that is shared by two apps from the same manufacturer.
Careful, I've had lots of problems with that--changes to defaults not being
saved when you synch, and so forth.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.
re not
sandboxed, I'd just use domain sockets.
<https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Darwin/Reference/Manpages/man4/unix.4.html>
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
fact
that you did not (yet, at least) discover this bug on 32-bit is just
coincidence. So check out your retain/release/autorelease handling of the
dictionary.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
rial # with
manufacturer). But I am sure you can get the answer to that question on Apple's
usb list ;-)
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.ap
On Jul 7, 2014, at 8:01 PM, SevenBits wrote:
> Is there any supported way to get the UUID of a FAT-formatted drive? Or
> another method which can uniquely identify USBs of all major filesystem types?
FAT drives do not have UUIDs.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.el
So there cannot
> ever be more than 4k of available data at a time, because “available” means
> “sitting in the buffer ready to be copied out”.
>
> —Jens
Which means, that until you read the 4K in the buffer, the sending side is
blocked.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
On Jul 2, 2014, at 6:34 PM, Jerry Krinock wrote:
> Although it was fun to write the code to buffer and stitch the message fields
> and length fields back together, I’d like to know what is causing these 4K
> breaks.
It's the OS itself. Unix domain sockets have 4k buffers.
gt; indices match the enumerated values.
>
>
>
> ___
>
> Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
>
> Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
> Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)li
On Jun 21, 2014, at 12:16 PM, Kyle Sluder wrote:
> And as far as I can remember, developers have _always_ been responsible for
> setting up a backstop autoreleasepool.
Never.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567
On Jun 17, 2014, at 7:14 AM, Mills, Steve wrote:
> The algorithm I've seen then takes the square root of that value.
If the square root of a is larger than the square root of b, then a is larger
than b ;-)
(In this case a & b will both be positive.)
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elev
avoid
all the hooha of a temporary variable and if statement:
valueA = [coder decodeObjectForKey:kValueAKey] ?: valueA;
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa
On Jun 4, 2014, at 10:04 PM, sonofsky2...@gmail.com wrote:
> Does anyone know weather an iPhone5 can be a USB Host Device?
No.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing l
On May 28, 2014, at 10:24 PM, Uli Kusterer wrote:
> That said, if you want to be really endian-safe, use an XML file format saved
> as UTF-8 like Property Lists. Most portable format there is. :-)
Thanks a lot. I have to go rinse out my mouth now.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-d
tely. (For read-only access.)
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Co
On May 26, 2014, at 9:32 AM, Uli Kusterer wrote:
> Oh, and as Roland wrote, don’t forget to free() the pointer once you’re done
> with it.
But, just to be 100% clear, *not* the one you get from calling the bytes method
;-)
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.el
On May 26, 2014, at 9:05 AM, Roland King wrote:
> The first one of those is ok...
No, it's not--take a closer look ;-)
> unsigned char* databuffer = (unsigned char*)malloc(datasize);
> [datastream getBytes:&databuffer range:NSMakeRange(positionCounter,
> datasize)];
-
g a good tutorial on C or Objective-C is in
order. If you have, then reviewing the sections on pointers and dynamic memory
is in order.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev
rt, then it could be
safe, but that's a tough requirement to meet.)
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303) 722-0567 voice
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post a
. And if there's only 1 argument, then you only need
myScript "$1"
No need to loop over the list for 1 argument...
Of course, you might want to check the number of arguments before assuming
there's only 1 and skipping the rest of the list. (Or, as with the answer in
that t
On May 17, 2014, at 5:54 PM, Bob Sabiston wrote:
> Within Automator, you have to add a “Get Specified Finder Items” action
> before the script...
No, that's for getting the Finder's current selection.
--
Scott Ribe
scott_r...@elevated-dev.com
http://www.elevated-dev.com/
(303
1 - 100 of 793 matches
Mail list logo
