[super init];
if (self) {
_foo = foo;
.
}
return self;
}
I had thought there would be memory leak. "Bla * b = [Bla alloc ]
initWithFoo:nil];" . However under ARC using Instruments Leaks, there are no
leak found.
Th
Actually your guess is wrong. Core Data could handle this by turn the object
to fault. Have a look at the method refreshObject:mergeChanges.
Bob Cromwell
On 2012-11-15, at 上午10:30, William Squires wrote:
> 1) Can CoreData properly manage an object graph where the objects form a
> ci
alueForKey:nil];
}
So my question is : are there any way to batch fault objects while take
advantage of the cache ?
Bob Cromwell
___
Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)
Please do not post admin requests or moderator comment
Hi Hunter,
I am very interested in what bugs they fixed. Could you please share more
about it , e.g. an official bug fix report ?
Thanks
Bob
> The API changes came in iOS 5 but in iOS 6 they fixed enough bugs to make it
> work right. :-)
> On Nov 11, 2012, at 4:50 PM, Rick Mann wrote:
According to ARC documentation, out parameter will be changed to auto release
one:
NSError ** error will be auto changed to NSError * __autorelease * error.
So It's expected behavior that crash happens. An article about this here
http://blog.pioneeringsoftware.co.uk/2012/03/06/out-parameter