On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Garrett Serack wrote:
> ** **
>
> I think I fixed the root problem with UTF-8 and the CoApp site (I added the
> meta tag in, as well as saving the layout files as UTF-8… without the BOM).
>
>
> ** **
>
> Hopefully this will fix my occasional flub with pasting
2011/7/19 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) :
> Actually, unlike dpkg, rpm has two forms of switches. You can use the
> expanded switches "--something-or-other" or the single letter combo switches
> "-sOo". Most people prefer to use rpm's single letter combo switches because
> "-sOo" would expand out to "--some
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Mark Stone wrote:
> 2011/7/19 Olaf van der Spek :
>>
>> dpkg and rpm are (IMO) low-level tools that most users should not be
>> using. The high-level ones are apt-get and yum. The high-level UI is
>> the most important one.
>>
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Garrett Serack wrote:
>
> (posted on the coapp website at:
> http://coapp.org/posts/2011/07/25/Changes-to-the-design-of-CoApp )
>
> On Friday, we had a conference call to discuss a critical problem in the
> CoApp package manager.
>
> ... when the user double-cli
terface for coapp (so that the command lines are equivalent).
>
> ** **
>
> Like I said, I also want to include a ‘short’ interface that has
> dash-plus-single-letter shortcuts for everything.
>
> ** **
>
> G****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Olaf van der Sp
Hi,
I decided to give coapp a try and expected to be able to install some
useful packages. But I can't figure out how.
Are these packages available yet?
Is there a simple how-to?
I did find the src repos but I don't see any msi's I could install for
those libs.
Greetings,
--
Olaf
_
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I decided to give coapp a try and expected to be able to install some
> useful packages. But I can't figure out how.
> Are these packages available yet?
> Is there a simple how-to?
>
> I did find the
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:33 PM, Garrett Serack wrote:
> We had some packages when we pushed out the first beta; I've since removed
> them because they'll be incompatible with beta 2, which we should be
> publishing the end of next week (Tim the Tester is on his honeymoon this
> week, so we're
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Garrett Serack wrote:
> *sigh*
>
> Software Developers use "Release Early, Release Often". It's not just an
> open source idea.
>
> And yes, that would be ideal.
>
> However, We're still at a stage where releasing something would be completely
> pointless.
>
> E
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Tim Rogers wrote:
> By the same token, releasing early makes the assumption that significant
> portions of the software in question are believed to operate correctly
> unless stated otherwise. We could absolutely release CoApp “early” in its
> present state, but I
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Tim Rogers wrote:
> I can understand that, Olaf. If you can hold out for another week or so we
> should have everything on the dev side (I think) and much of the client-side
> working well enough that common use will be practical. The biggest reason
> why CoApp
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Tim Rogers wrote:
> Drop me an email or talk to me on IRC and I can try talking you through the
> process.
Wouldn't it be better to publish this on the coapp site?
You should make it as easy as possible for others to contribute.
Olaf
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Garrett Serack wrote:
> You mean on the CoApp Wiki where it's been for months?
>
> https://github.com/coapp/coapp.org/wiki/Setting-Up-Your-CoApp-Development-Environment
I didn't find it when I was looking for it. Thanks.
http://coapp.org/Development/DevDocs.html
101 - 113 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
