[Coapp-developers] misc questions

2011-12-16 Thread Dario Bertini
Hello, I know about coapp since quite a bit of time, but (since my platform of choice is linux) I haven't look at it in a while, and it seems it has done huge leaps forward :D So, the first question is: Should I nag fellow windows developers to take coapp into consideration already? :) Is it

Re: [Coapp-developers] Awesome documentation for CoApp

2011-12-16 Thread Mateusz Łoskot
2011/12/16 Garrett Serack : > Well, since I'm going to spend the next week or so writing docs, I'll start > by chiming in. > > The wiki's not a bad place to start (GitHub's wiki is Markdown, so that's a > good thing). GitHub Wiki is great. My concern is about using Wiki in general as a first-con

Re: [Coapp-developers] Awesome documentation for CoApp

2011-12-16 Thread Adam Baxter
So into the wiki idea, add approved revisions - that way you get the benefits of wikis with some versioning and publishing. On Dec 17, 2011 9:52 AM, "Mateusz Łoskot" wrote: > 2011/12/16 Garrett Serack : > > Well, since I'm going to spend the next week or so writing docs, I'll > start by chiming i

Re: [Coapp-developers] Awesome documentation for CoApp

2011-12-16 Thread Mateusz Łoskot
2011/12/16 Adam Baxter : > So into the wiki idea, add approved revisions - that way you get the > benefits of wikis with some versioning and publishing. I think it's a good idea. Simply, if there is: a) well-defined workflow of documenting CoApp b) stable frame for documentation structure set then