On
Behalf Of Eric Schultz
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 12:44 PM
To: William A. Rowe Jr.
Cc: coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Coapp-developers] Simulating Symlinks on Windows XP
I know it sounds crazy at first. Consider though the situation of a
Windows-only program with depen
I would argue to get it done right between the targeted versions of Windows
before expanding into the world of "what ifs".
As for symlinks, my only meaningless contribution are the famous words of Béla
Károlyi, Kerri Strug's coach: "You can do it."
- nasser
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Eric S
I know it sounds crazy at first. Consider though the situation of a
Windows-only program with dependencies on CoApp packages that someone wants
to install on Linux. It would be nice if installing that didn't fail.
Again, it's not a particularly pressing issue just something to think about.
Eric
, April 07, 2011 6:34 PM
To: coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Coapp-developers] Simulating Symlinks on Windows XP
On 4/7/2011 8:06 PM, Eric Schultz wrote:
> I wonder what effect all this will have on CoApp package installation on
> WINE. Obviously
> that not a pressing issu
On 4/7/2011 8:06 PM, Eric Schultz wrote:
> I wonder what effect all this will have on CoApp package installation on
> WINE. Obviously
> that not a pressing issue but its probably something to consider going
> forward.
. Entire point of CoApp - running OSS packages natively
Let's see, what is i
his is
man's code!
>
> Given that we have a .NET 4.0 requirement, and Wine doesn't have that...
>
> G
>
> From: Eric Schultz [wwaha...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 6:06 PM
> To: Garrett Serack
> Cc: coapp-developers@
I wonder what effect all this will have on CoApp package installation on
WINE. Obviously that not a pressing issue but its probably something to
consider going forward.
Eric
On Apr 7, 2011 12:27 PM, "Garrett Serack" wrote:
___
Mailing list: https://laun
tl;dr: Stop using old operating systems, damnit!
On 4/7/2011 9:03 AM, Garrett Serack wrote:
As
I mentioned in my last post, CoApp’s design relies heavily on
the use of Symbolic Links (symlinks)—a
e: [Coapp-developers] Simulating Symlinks on Windows XP
On 4/7/11 9:03 AM, Garrett Serack wrote:
> As I mentioned in my last post, CoApp's design relies heavily> > on the use
> of symlinks
Does CoApp's dependency on symlinks cause it to only target NTFS volumes? Can
it target F
On 4/7/11 9:03 AM, Garrett Serack wrote:
> As I mentioned in my last post, CoApp's design relies heavily>
> on the use of symlinks
Does CoApp's dependency on symlinks cause it to only target NTFS
volumes? Can it target FAT volumes, like MSI/WIX and NSIS?
Thanks.
_
10 matches
Mail list logo
