I agree, given that we're already going to be elevating via UAC.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers
Post to : coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers
More help : https://help
>> coapp-developers-bounces+tiroger=microsoft@lists.launchpad.net[mailto:
>> coapp-developers-bounces+tiroger=microsoft@lists.launchpad.net] On
>> Behalf Of Garrett Serack
>> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 2:15 PM
>> To: Jernej Simončič; Garrett Serack on
uly 25, 2011 2:15 PM
> To: Jernej Simončič; Garrett Serack on [coapp-developers]
> Subject: Re: [Coapp-developers] Changes to the design of CoApp
>
> *cough* *mumble* *cough*
>
> Look at that, it's the Goodyear Blimp!
>
>
>
> I don't disagree with
ck
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 2:15 PM
To: Jernej Simončič; Garrett Serack on [coapp-developers]
Subject: Re: [Coapp-developers] Changes to the design of CoApp
*cough* *mumble* *cough*
Look at that, it's the Goodyear Blimp!
I don't disagree with your statement.
G
-Original
Arguably, it is an even worse idea to write a custom service to require
symlink privileges. As long as symlink creation is done by msiexec, then it
can be tracked, but if a custom service does it, you can't really track what
symlinks are made on the system. The fact is, UNIX systems have allowed al
ad.net] On
Behalf Of Jernej Simoncic
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 2:06 PM
To: Garrett Serack on [coapp-developers]
Subject: Re: [Coapp-developers] Changes to the design of CoApp
On Monday, July 25, 2011, 22:53:46, Garrett Serack wrote:
> They restricted a lot of the privileges that are available to
On Monday, July 25, 2011, 22:53:46, Garrett Serack wrote:
> They restricted a lot of the privileges that are available to
> LOCALSYSTEM as a security precaution and no, they ain't gonna
> fix that (their response is, if you need to do that, write a service).
Which of course brings the questio
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 1:52 PM
To: Garrett Serack
Cc: coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Coapp-developers] Changes to the design of CoApp
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Garrett Serack wrote:
>
> (posted on the coapp website at:
> http://coapp.org/posts/2011/07/25/
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Garrett Serack wrote:
>
> (posted on the coapp website at:
> http://coapp.org/posts/2011/07/25/Changes-to-the-design-of-CoApp )
>
> On Friday, we had a conference call to discuss a critical problem in the
> CoApp package manager.
>
> ... when the user double-cli
9 matches
Mail list logo
