Hmm, I didn't realize you can get API access to Disqus without paying but
apparently you can. There are some APIs that are restricted to free users.
And quite honestly, even developing a commenting system using the Disqus API
will take more time than just slapping a web browser control in there.
O
Just a note: We can tap into Disqus' API without needing a web
control :)
/rafael
On 9/22/2011 8:31 AM, Garrett Serack wrote:
Somewhere down the line (1.0, 1.1 maybe) I
have the desire to have the full CoApp
> The only thing we’d have to do is put in a browser control into the UI (and
> we can obviously lock what it can do down), and present the appropriate view
> to the user.
>
> ** **
>
> We could either use the IE WPF widget, or it turns out there is another
> based on the Chromium/Webkit engine
y, September 22, 2011 10:36 AM
To: Garrett Serack
Cc: coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Coapp-developers] Idea for package comments/feedback/ratings
While always a huge fan of anything Chrome, Awesomium has licensing that
wouldn't work very well with an open source project
While always a huge fan of anything Chrome, Awesomium has licensing that
wouldn't work very well with an open source project. Otherwise, I think it's
a very reasonable plan.
Eric
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Garrett Serack wrote:
> Somewhere down the line (1.0, 1.1 maybe) I have the desire
Somewhere down the line (1.0, 1.1 maybe) I have the desire to have the full
CoApp package manager GUI support feedback, comments and ratings on packages.
Now, I really, *REALLY* don't wanna go to the effort of writing all that myself
(what with accounts, logins, tracking, etc), so I'm thinking w
6 matches
Mail list logo
