Re: [Coapp-developers] Engine - Teds initial take

2010-08-11 Thread Garrett Serack
Hey Olaf, I just wanted to thank you for taking the time out to code review what Ted had done. Feel free to continue doing code reviews--reviewing is one practice that I hope we can all get into more. As we evolve the project and actually get stuff written, I'd like to also make sure that we

Re: [Coapp-developers] Engine - Teds initial take

2010-08-09 Thread Garrett Serack
ge- From: Andrew Fenn [mailto:andrewf...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 8:20 PM To: Garrett Serack Cc: Rivera, Rafael; Elizabeth M Smith; coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Coapp-developers] Engine - Teds initial take I have no idea when it comes to unicode in C/C++ howe

Re: [Coapp-developers] Engine - Teds initial take

2010-08-05 Thread Andrew Fenn
--- > From: coapp-developers-bounces+garretts=microsoft@lists.launchpad.net > [mailto:coapp-developers-bounces+garretts=microsoft@lists.launchpad.net] > On Behalf Of Rivera, Rafael > Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 6:06 PM > To: Elizabeth M Smith > Cc: coapp-developers@li

Re: [Coapp-developers] Engine - Teds initial take

2010-08-05 Thread Nasser Dassi
The godfather has spoken. On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Garrett Serack wrote: > > (still on vacation... just poking my nose in). > > I had no particular opinion [ _T("") vs L"" ] but I do like the idea that > perhaps we should explicitly NOT support ANSI. I can't see a really good > reason to s

Re: [Coapp-developers] Engine - Teds initial take

2010-08-05 Thread Garrett Serack
To: Elizabeth M Smith Cc: coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Coapp-developers] Engine - Teds initial take That's a pretty poor reason to not type a few extra characters... but I can't offer a concrete reason why we should support ANSI. /rafael On 8/4/2010 11:25 AM, Elizabeth

Re: [Coapp-developers] Engine - Teds initial take

2010-08-04 Thread Rivera, Rafael
That's a pretty poor reason to not type a few extra characters... but I can't offer a concrete reason why we should support ANSI. /rafael On 8/4/2010 11:25 AM, Elizabeth M Smith wrote: > On 8/4/2010 11:13 AM, Rivera, Rafael wrote: >> Looks nice, love the chip name. >> >> Just one note -- I see wi

Re: [Coapp-developers] Engine - Teds initial take

2010-08-04 Thread Olaf van der Spek
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Ted Bullock wrote: >>> '\\ No newline at end of file' >> >> Might be a good idea to add this newline to every file. A shame VS >> doesn't do this by default... > > Is this really important? Why would we need a new line at the end of the file? No, but http://bazaar

Re: [Coapp-developers] Engine - Teds initial take

2010-08-04 Thread Ted Bullock
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > chip/chip.c: >> if(err = coapp_core_new(&chip_core)) > > What does the style guide say about a space between if and (? > My preference is a space. We haven't specified it. This is how I have coded in the past. Personally I don't really c

Re: [Coapp-developers] Engine - Teds initial take

2010-08-04 Thread Rivera, Rafael
On 8/4/2010 11:25 AM, Elizabeth M Smith wrote: On 8/4/2010 11:13 AM, Rivera, Rafael wrote: Looks nice, love the chip name. Just one note -- I see wide-character strings in use. I suggest replacing them, and their print functions, with T equivalents, leaving the choice

Re: [Coapp-developers] Engine - Teds initial take

2010-08-04 Thread Elizabeth M Smith
On 8/4/2010 11:13 AM, Rivera, Rafael wrote: Looks nice, love the chip name. Just one note -- I see wide-character strings in use. I suggest replacing them, and their print functions, with T equivalents, leaving the choice of ANSI or UNICODE to the magical defines in the headers and ultimately th

Re: [Coapp-developers] Engine - Teds initial take

2010-08-04 Thread Olaf van der Spek
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Rivera, Rafael wrote: > And waste two bytes?! Silly ANSI and ISO C standards. Only one if you use Linux EOLs. ;) Olaf ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers Post to : coapp-developers@lists.launch

Re: [Coapp-developers] Engine - Teds initial take

2010-08-04 Thread Rivera, Rafael
And waste two bytes?! Silly ANSI and ISO C standards. /rafael On 8/4/2010 10:30 AM, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > >> '\\ No newline at end of file' >> > Might be a good idea to add this newline to every file. A shame VS > doesn't do this by default... > _

Re: [Coapp-developers] Engine - Teds initial take

2010-08-04 Thread Rivera, Rafael
Looks nice, love the chip name. Just one note -- I see wide-character strings in use. I suggest replacing them, and their print functions, with T equivalents, leaving the choice of ANSI or UNICODE to the magical defines in the headers and ultimately the human compiling this stuff. So, from initia

Re: [Coapp-developers] Engine - Teds initial take

2010-08-04 Thread Olaf van der Spek
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Ted Bullock wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I just committed a couple hours of thought towards the coapp-engine to: > > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~tbullock/coapp-engine/experiment/changes Hi Ted, Just a few quick comments from a scan of the code. Haven't compiled it yet:

[Coapp-developers] Engine - Teds initial take

2010-08-03 Thread Ted Bullock
Hi Folks, I just committed a couple hours of thought towards the coapp-engine to: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~tbullock/coapp-engine/experiment/changes This does profoundly little at the moment but does specify the beginnings of the coapp engine event loop that I have envisioned. I would have li