2011/12/21 Garrett Serack :
> So the consensus is to take snapshots, not import history.
> I'm really good with that.
Yes. Just maintain snapshots of packaged project + history of
CoApp-specific changes.
> (since it really means that anything
> we're dealing with is 1 fork = (1 snapshot of a fore
So the consensus is to take snapshots, not import history.
I'm really good with that. (since it really means that anything we're dealing
with is 1 fork = (1 snapshot of a foreign source tree/tag/branch).
Pretty much clears up how we deal with branches then too.
G
-Original Message
2011/12/21 Vincent Povirk :
>> Simply put, I think we need to achieve something like this:
>>
>> http://happygiraffe.net/blog/files/wordpress_vendor_branch.png
>
> Brilliant. That picture sums up what I mean exactly.
Vincent,
Fantastico. We are clear then.
Garrett,
What is your opinion about al
On 21 December 2011 01:46, Garrett Serack wrote:
> I've been feverishly trying to write documentation this week ... and at the
> same time enhancing the DocPad-powered cms engine that's powering the
> CoApp.org website.
Garrett,
The new coapp.org looks great!
AFAIU, the "Version:1.0" means versi
Just a note - fairly sure that Notepad++ uses the Scintilla components from
SciTE anyway!
2011/12/21 Garrett Serack
> Really, it has nothing to do with "Windows" as much as just the way
> notepad is written.
>
> There's not really much in Windows that cares about LF vs CRLF, it's
> just what t
5 matches
Mail list logo
