That makes sense. The Jeep engine was around 120 cubic inches IIRC and the A4
is 60.
Joe Della Barba
Coquina
From: Bill Bina [mailto:billb...@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 8:47 AM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Cc: Della Barba, Joe
Subject: Re: Stus-List Marine vs Automotive parts
That
-Original Message-
From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Knowles Rich
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 9:23 AM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Marine vs Automotive parts
Amazing what a bit of wartime pressure will do!
Rich Knowles
Indigo. LF38
Halifax
On
Amazing what a bit of wartime pressure will do!
Rich Knowles
Indigo. LF38
Halifax
On 2013-05-17, at 10:13, "Dennis C." wrote:
> When asked to develop a new boat for the military, he designed, built and
> tested it in 96 hours!
___
This List is provi
ba
> Coquina
> C&C 35 MK I
>
> From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of dwight
> veinot
> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 7:26 AM
> To: billb...@sbcglobal.net; cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> Subject: Re: Stus-List Marine vs Automotive parts
>
>
o:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Della Barba,
Joe
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 9:03 AM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Marine vs Automotive parts
The Atomic 4 is not a Jeep engine. It was always a marine engine and given the
layout of the flywheel and transmission,
*From:*CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] *On Behalf Of
*Hoyt, Mike
*Sent:* Friday, May 17, 2013 8:23 AM
*To:* cnc-list@cnc-list.com
*Subject:* Re: Stus-List Marine vs Automotive parts
I once heard a story that the Atomic 4 was the power plant in the WW
II landing craft. Anyone know
st@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Marine vs Automotive parts
I once heard a story that the Atomic 4 was the power plant in the WW II landing
craft. Anyone know if this is true?
From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Della Barba,
Joe
Se
Head of St. Margaret's Bay, NS
_
From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Della
Barba, Joe
Sent: May 17, 2013 9:03 AM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Marine vs Automotive parts
The Atomic 4 is not a Jeep engine. It was always a mar
Subject: Re: Stus-List Marine vs Automotive parts
The Atomic 4 is not a Jeep engine. It was always a marine engine and
given the layout of the flywheel and transmission, could not possibly
ever be used in a car, tractor, or any type of motor vehicle. Universal
never used an outside source for the
-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Marine vs Automotive parts
The major difference between starters and alternators intended for marine use
is they have fine screening over all the air venting gaps to prevent sparking
igniting fumes.
Rich Knowles
Indigo. LF38
Halifax
On 2013-05-17, at 9:02, "
dom totally unsafe spot LOL
Joe Della Barba
Coquina
C&C 35 MK I
From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of dwight veinot
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2013 7:26 AM
To: billb...@sbcglobal.net; cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Marine vs Automotive parts
Bill
I ag
cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Bill Bina
Sent: May 17, 2013 6:55 AM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com<mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
Subject: Re: Stus-List Marine vs Automotive parts
Belts don't matter, but for gasoline engines on a boat, the difference in
marine parts vs automotive
] On Behalf Of
robertlma...@gmail.com
Sent: May 17, 2013 8:34 AM
To: Michael Cotton; cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Marine vs Automotive parts
Don't forget Don Moyer and Moyer Marine as a source A4 parts and components.
Their website is a valuable asset for all Atomic Four owners
@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Marine vs Automotive parts
___
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
___
This List is provide
ill Bina
Sent: May 17, 2013 6:55 AM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Marine vs Automotive parts
Belts don't matter, but for gasoline engines on a boat, the difference in
marine parts vs automotive parts can be the difference between life and
death. It's not a reliabilit
Belts don't matter, but for gasoline
engines on a boat, the difference in marine parts vs automotive
parts can be the difference between life and death. It's not a
reliability issue or how well the part performs. It's an EXPLOSION
issue. Gasoline fumes are heavier
alf Of Michael
Cotton
Sent: May 17, 2013 2:32 AM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Marine vs Automotive parts
AC Delco is GM's OE supplier. NAPA is an aftermarket supplier. They are not
equal. AC Delco is a superior product. I have no interest in either company.
I do have 4
er Co
>
> From: dwight veinot
>To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
>Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 11:32 AM
>Subject: Re: Stus-List Marine vs Automotive parts
>
>
>
>
>If it matters to you Damien I always
used NAPA or AC Delco parts on the Atomic 4 in my 27 when I owned t
_
From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Damien
Morrissey
Sent: May 16, 2013 2:00 PM
To: CnC-List@cnc-list.com
Subject: Stus-List Marine vs Automotive parts
Thanks Bill Bina for the explanation - excerpt below ..
I knew there had to be a better reason that just go
-list.com
Subject: Stus-List Marine vs Automotive parts
Thanks Bill Bina for the explanation - excerpt below ..
I knew there had to be a better reason that just gouging us ""rich" boating
types
As for the parts I needed for the Atomic 4 engine, the parts list I used came
from Stu&#x
Thanks Bill Bina for the explanation - excerpt below ..
I knew there had to be a better reason that just gouging us ""rich" boating
types
As for the parts I needed for the Atomic 4 engine, the parts list I used
came from Stu's list on the C&C Photoalbum and I thought they were the
right ones.
21 matches
Mail list logo
