Re: Stus-List DARK SIDE now PHRF

2018-06-28 Thread Ronald B. Frerker via CnC-List
PHRF is set up as independent stations; US Sailing only reports averages, it doesn't set them.If you're in a lower wind area, your local station should adjust accordingly.On Carlyle, we adjust according to the SA/D ratio since our courses are rather short.  Some legs are only a couple miles lon

Re: Stus-List DARK SIDE

2018-06-26 Thread Chuck S via CnC-List
Thoughts on PHRF: There are a few PHRF rated boats that seem to defy their rating and sail much faster. My New Jersey fleet had a J28, a cruiser with a rating 171, similar to a J24, but with longer waterline and bigger sails. Our rating was 99 and we had better upwind speed, but In many light ai

Re: Stus-List DARK SIDE

2018-06-25 Thread Francois Rivard via CnC-List
Our Typical beercan races were 2.6 - 2.8 nm so it's 198-102= We owe them 96 sec per mile X 2.6 - 2.8 = 4:30 to 4:48 or close to 5 minutes for us LOL. We were Typically less then 30 seconds ahead in corrected time so always a nail biter on both sides (A tribute to how well the PHRF systems works wh

Re: Stus-List DARK SIDE

2018-06-25 Thread Randy Stafford via CnC-List
The way my RSA handicaps, 6-12 seconds slower than other RSAs, for JAM races I rate 198 and the Catalina 27s rate 221 - I’m giving them 23 sec / nm. And my club scores via PHRF TOT with A=715 and B=515, so boats rating <200 have time added and boats rating >200 have time subtracted. In a one-ho

Re: Stus-List DARK SIDE

2018-06-25 Thread Randy Stafford via CnC-List
If it’s any consolation, the Catalina 27s in my club can out-point my 30 MK I by just a couple degrees, at least when I’m flying a 150% genoa. Cheers, Randy > On Jun 25, 2018, at 7:43 AM, Robert Gallagher via CnC-List > wrote: > > Rob, > > Congrats on the sale and upcoming purchase of your f