Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

Hi, I'm in favor to continue CLUG. My interests would be in the personal and maker topics. I have used Fedora in the past as my personal computer and plan on tinkering with my Raspberry Pi. Darcy On 2017-01-12 12:40, frank wrote: I personally belong mostly to the enduser site now. I w

Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

I personally belong mostly to the enduser site now. I was a developer on a HP Superdome but that's a while ago. And I am interested on what is going on at the server side, just to get more depth inside of what is everybody talking (emailing) about, e.g. docker etc. Currently I am using Linux Mi

Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

**Tinker with industrial devices** i.e Raspberry pi and ardruino. On Jan 12, 2017 11:40 AM, "Juan Alberto Cirez" wrote: > Neil, > +1 on your comments. I belong to that same category as I admin a fleet of > servers on behalf of multiple clients; I also run a micro-datacenter at > home (running op

Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

Neil, +1 on your comments. I belong to that same category as I admin a fleet of servers on behalf of multiple clients; I also run a micro-datacenter at home (running openstack and a multitude of microservices/workloads on top); plus rinker with industrial devices (maker community). on the device si

Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

I think the issue here is that we’re looking at several distinct categories of people who might be interested in a LUG, and it’s hard to be relevant to all of them. In particular, I think there’s a difference between those who use Linux professionally as a major part of their day job, and those wh

[clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

Ping ___ clug-talk mailing list clug-talk@clug.ca http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying

Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

utlook >>> From: clug-talk on behalf of Michael John >>> Walters >>> Sent: January 11, 2017 9:53:35 AM >>> To: CLUG General >>> Subject: Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance >>> >>> I am for a new and vital clug. >>> >>>

Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

* clug-talk on behalf of Michael John Walters *Sent:* January 11, 2017 9:53:35 AM *To:* CLUG General *Subject:* Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance I am for a new and vital clug. Regards, Michael On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 18:11 -0700, PUB @ Keystreams.net wrote: > to kill the name and abandon the

Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

eneral *Subject:* Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance I am for a new and vital clug. Regards, Michael On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 18:11 -0700, PUB @ Keystreams.net wrote: > to kill the name and abandon the original concept of a LUG perhaps, to embrace and expand and to reinvent is the question I'

Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

Ping Sent from Outlook<http://aka.ms/weboutlook> From: clug-talk on behalf of Michael John Walters Sent: January 11, 2017 9:53:35 AM To: CLUG General Subject: Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance I am for a new and vital clug. Regards, Michael On Tue

Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

I am for a new and vital clug. Regards, Michael On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 18:11 -0700, PUB @ Keystreams.net wrote: > to kill the name and abandon the original concept of a LUG perhaps, to > embrace and expand and to reinvent is the question I'm getting from this... > > Down With CLUG! All Hail t

Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

:-) I was just getting going! On 01/10/2017 11:54 PM, Juan Alberto Cirez wrote: > OK. That's enough out of you. No more beer for you. You are cut off. ROFL! > > On Jan 10, 2017 11:46 PM, "PUB @ Keystreams.net" > wrote: > > At first glance I thought it had something

Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

OK. That's enough out of you. No more beer for you. You are cut off. ROFL! On Jan 10, 2017 11:46 PM, "PUB @ Keystreams.net" wrote: > At first glance I thought it had something to do with some wild swarm of > unix sockets used for testing or perhaps even knocking servers offline, and > I thought,

Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

At first glance I thought it had something to do with some wild swarm of unix sockets used for testing or perhaps even knocking servers offline, and I thought, wh? - global domination by the unix socket swarm? peshaw! or is it actually real? hmmm, come to think of it, millions of machines al

Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

Yeah, I saw that on github. It's a pretty cool idea too :-) On Jan 10, 2017 11:16 PM, "PUB @ Keystreams.net" wrote: > "socket-swarm: > > Create a swarm of socket.io clients to stress test your socket-based > application. Provides hooks to allow for HTTP based authentication to be > passed into t

Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

"socket-swarm: Create a swarm of socket.io clients to stress test your socket-based application. Provides hooks to allow for HTTP based authentication to be passed into the socket connection requests if necessary, as well as listening to and responding to various socket events." It's also a co

Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

I meant Docker Swarms. LOL! They are a docker cluster management. Kubernetes has emerged as a preferred method for managing Docker workloads, however. On Jan 10, 2017 9:05 PM, "PUB @ Keystreams.net" wrote: > Looking back on this I responded too quickly but part of my intention was > to help spar

Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

This slide to apparent irrelevance has been voiced over and over for years. You bring up some valid points. But who can say what makes this and the other things irrelevant. Think of the first peer to peer design, then came the client server model. Will peer to peer be important again? Look

Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

Looking back on this I responded too quickly but part of my intention was to help spark things a bit. The original concept of a LUG was never under attack - after all the concept is a basic one: meet people, learn and be introduced to new things - but that's rehashing what people already know.

Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

That's one. Can we get a show of hands from the back? On 01/10/2017 06:36 PM, Sam Khangyi wrote: > Hail the New CLUG, > > > > On January 10, 2017 Tuesday 18:11:05 PUB @ Keystreams.net wrote: > > > to kill the name and abandon the original concept of a LUG perhaps, to > > > embrace and expand and

Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

Hail the New CLUG, On January 10, 2017 Tuesday 18:11:05 PUB @ Keystreams.net wrote: > to kill the name and abandon the original concept of a LUG perhaps, to > embrace and expand and to reinvent is the question I'm getting from this... > > Down With CLUG! All Hail the New CLUG, er, CLUG OF EXPANDE

Re: [clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

to kill the name and abandon the original concept of a LUG perhaps, to embrace and expand and to reinvent is the question I'm getting from this... Down With CLUG! All Hail the New CLUG, er, CLUG OF EXPANDED DIMENSIONS - meaning after that we are all CLUGed! for curiosity, can we see a show of h

[clug-talk] Reboot:Relevance

Good evening fellow CLUG-philes, I have observed the posts for the past several years and my take away is that we have lost a bit of relevance. By that I mean we tend to post and discuss topics that are at best dated, and at worst irrelevant to the idea of driving GNU/Linux forward. The world today