+cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
From: Chiradeep Vittal
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 12:35 PM
To: Sanjeev Neelarapu; Sheng Yang
Cc: #Cloud - Engineering
Subject: Re: PRD Review on Byron Requirement: Remote-access VPN on External
devices
This discussion should happen on the ML
From
Hi Sheng,
Following are the review comments on F5&SRX in in-line mode PRD:
1. Apart from providing security to load balancing traffic are there any
other benefits of deploying F5&SRX in in-line mode?
2. In this scenario SRX is the single point of contact for the entire
zone. How are
g VPN user supported only
by Admin ?
3. Any manual configuration is required on SRX to enable this
functionality?
Thanks,
Sanjeev
From: Sheng Yang
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:14 PM
To: Sanjeev Neelarapu
Cc: Haroon Abdelrahman; Sudha Ponnaganti; Srinivas Vejalla
Subject: RE: F5 SRX
Hi,
Following is the test plan link for “F5 and SRX inline mode” feature. Please
review and send your comments by Friday 19^th Cot 2012 EOD.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/F5-SRX+Inline+Mode
Thanks,
Sanjeev
Hi,
I found a blocker bug in ASF 4.1 latest build . Following is the bug id :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1382
I am unable to proceed with my testing due to this .
Latest commit id on this build: 903aeb9b775561763810b7de708a7997a4685509
Thanks,
Sanjeev
Hi Hari,
AFAIK, in CloudStack if a host crashes CloudStack would detect the host as down
after pingTimeout interval.
CloudStack does not reduce the available capacity because the host capacity
values are not removed from op_host_capacity table. It assumes the host down is
a temporary issue.
Th
Hi,
Can you please provide me the edit access to Jira. Following are my user
details:
Username: sanjeevn
Mail id: sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com
Please do the needful.
Thanks,
Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: Srikanteswararao Talluri [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com]
Sent: T
+1
-Original Message-
From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 10:20 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of SRX&F5 inline mode support in
CloudStack from Citrix
+1
> -Original Message-
> From
Is there any FS for Site-to-Site 2.0 enhancements(Monitoring Site-to-Site vpn
tunnels)?
Thanks,
Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.s...@citrix.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 5:46 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [ASFCS41] Site-to-Site
Hi,
I have reviews Multiple IP Ranges FS available @
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Multiple+Ip+ranges+FS
and below are my review comments:
1.Is there any limit on no.of subnets/IP ranges that can be added for
guest?(since a new nic is added on router vm for every diffe
+1
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 1:35 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE} Accept a donaiton of "support security group enabled
network in advanced zone" from Citrix
+1
-Original M
+1
-Original Message-
From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 9:29 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of Egress firewall rules feature for
guest network for CloudStack from Citrix
+1
+1
-Original Message-
From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 1:31 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Accept a donation of 'network service support in shared
network' from Citrix.
+1
> -Original
[mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 11:54 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] Site-to-Site 2.0 enhancements
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:50 AM, Sanjeev Neelarapu
wrote:
> Is there any FS for Site-to-Site 2.0 enhancements(Monitoring Site-to-Site
Hi,
I have prepared test cases for "Monitoring of Site-to-Site VPN Tunnels" feature
and following is the test plan link:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Monitoring+Site-to-Site+VPN+Test+Cases
Please review and let me know your comments.
Thanks,
Sanjeev
Santhanam
Cc: cloudstack; Sanjeev Neelarapu; David Nalley
Subject: Re: Review Request: Two test cases from snapshots imporevement feature
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9752/
First - thanks for working on tests!! It's something we need
Is this applicable to Virtual Router as well?
-Original Message-
From: Saksham Srivastava [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of
Saksham Srivastava
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 3:53 PM
To: Saksham Srivastava; cloudstack
Subject: Re: Review Request: CS-15048: Log rotation funct
Hi,
It has been seen that logs on VR are not preserved. However /etc/logrotate.conf
says it is daily.
Please let me know the log rotation policy for /var/logs on VR.
Thanks,
Sanjeev
Latest CloudStack works with XenServer 6.0.2
Thanks,
Sanjeev
-Original Message-
From: Olga Smola [mailto:olya.sm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 5:53 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Xen Server versions
Hi,
Could y
Adding cloudstack-dev
FYI..
From: Salvatore Orlando
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 2:08 PM
To: Sanjeev Neelarapu; Kevin Kluge; Chiradeep Vittal
Cc: #Cloud - Bonita
Subject: RE: Test cases for Open vSwitch Tunnel Manager
Hi Sanjeev,
Thanks for preparing and sharing this document.
I have the
Hi,
In advanced networking the user VMs get private address by default.
Please follow below steps for the user to have Direct attached networking:
1. Create network offering with guest type "Shared"
2. Create guest network using the network offering created at step 1 and while
creating guest net
21 matches
Mail list logo
