Hi folks,
I have been committing the translations to the 4.1 branch.
There is an issue with authorship of the translations.
Translators submit translations of strings via a site called transifex. A
documentation file can therefore have multiple translators.
The authorship appears in the .po fil
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10042/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
There are two ExpungeTask r
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10017/#review18147
---
Ship it!
Changes look good. A committer needs to take a look and co
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10043/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Childers.
Description
---
StatsColl
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 02:30:32PM +0100, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 03/19/2013 01:37 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 05:11:19PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> >>On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:26:30PM +0100, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>On 03/18/2
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:44:58PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> >
> > Could you check if jna.jar is in the classpath in the init script
> > and that it also exists?
> >
> > Could you also try adding platform.jar to the classpath if that
> > doesn't work?
> >
>
> The classpath in init is /
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:19:57PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 01:45:46PM +0530, prasanna wrote:
> > On 13 March 2013 12:56, Pradeep Soundararajan
> > wrote:
> > > David,
> > >
> > > I did not come across this issue "cpio: Bad magic" even before or after
> > > your
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9752/
---
(Updated March 20, 2013, 1:33 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna S
Kelven, I see that you fixed action event issue in below commit. But I am
still running into some issues. While working on CLOUDSTACK-1673 I noticed
that in case of AccountManagerImpl, there are multiple methods with same
name. So in that case getAnnotation on the method is returning null even
tho
On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:30 PM, Min Chen wrote:
> I also encounter this mount issue on Mac OS, this seems an issue specific
> to Mac. On my Ubuntu box, it went fine.
>
Ok removing the -b in scripts/vm/systemvm/injectkeys.sh seems to solve the
issue.
-b does not exist for cp in OSX.
-sebastien
On 03/20/2013 12:19 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:19:57PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 01:45:46PM +0530, prasanna wrote:
On 13 March 2013 12:56, Pradeep Soundararajan
wrote:
David,
I did not come across this issue "cpio: Bad magic" eve
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10042/
---
(Updated March 20, 2013, 3:39 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Joe Brock
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10010/#review18153
---
Ship it!
applied to 4.1
- Chip Childers
On March 20, 2013, 6:21
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10043/#review18155
---
Ship it!
Applied to 4.1: cfff6708f35cfbe3a8f8a61b854b8043942d5b4c
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:45:19AM +, Murali Reddy wrote:
> I would like to merge GSLB feature proposed [1] and developed in the feature
> branch [2] into master. Code for this feature pretty much conforms to what
> was proposed in FS [3]. I added unit tests for all the new service layer
> m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10045/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
CLOUDSTACK-1714: Doc sectio
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10021/#review18156
---
The patch does not apply, but I assume that you will work through th
Jessica / Radhika,
Can you answer any of David's questions?
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 04:04:45PM -0400, David Grizzanti wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm looking to convert a few of the leftover sections of the Install Guide
> (pre-Apache) into XML and incorporate into the new documentation format.
> Ou
Hi All,
Thank you for a great work on CloudStack! We are interested in integrating
CS with our storage system and started to look at your documentation and
storage-related code. I see that Mike from SolidFire started working on
something similar some time ago and Edison even created an empty plu
Scratch that - Sorry Jessica / Radhika.
David's looking for technical reviewers.
David -- I think that the challenge here is that the actual material
for each of those docs is very broad. Perhaps the right way to
approach this is to attempt the fix, submit it, and initiate a content
discussion (
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 04:57:58AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have been committing the translations to the 4.1 branch.
>
> There is an issue with authorship of the translations.
>
> Translators submit translations of strings via a site called transifex. A
> documentation
Hi,
Yeah, CHAP is not supported in the CloudStack API when creating/editing
Primary Storage (in other words, you can't create an iSCSI-based Primary
Storage using CHAP). To make it work for XenServer, for example, you need
to set up your Storage Repository in XenServer first, then go to CloudStac
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Scratch that - Sorry Jessica / Radhika.
>
> David's looking for technical reviewers.
>
> David -- I think that the challenge here is that the actual material
> for each of those docs is very broad. Perhaps the right way to
> approach this i
Might be nice to get a list of them and put it in the commit message.
(e.g. if you commit the pt_BR translation, list all of the
contributors in the commit message, that should be automatable.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 04:57:58AM -0400, Sebas
> On Feb. 28, 2013, 2:20 a.m., Nitin Mehta wrote:
> > Ship It!
Nitin please apply the patch
- Animesh
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7018/#review17183
---
Mice any updates, when can you provide a global enable/disable flag for the
feature?
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 10:44 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Chandan Purushothama
Hi Mike,
Thank you for the prompt reply! Our use-cases are very similar. We provide
Virtual Private Storage Arrays to Cloud users. In this case VM(-s) receive
access to dedicated storage resources (== dedicated disk spindles).
Allocating storage from the shared pool is not an option in this case
On 20 March 2013 20:26, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 03/20/2013 12:19 PM, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 02:19:57PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 01:45:46PM +0530, prasanna wrote:
On 13 March 2013 12:56, Pradeep Soundarara
Radhika,
One more observation:
In 4.1.2.1. Prerequisites and Guidelines , we should change the system template
location to wherever we are planning to host the ipv6 specific templates.
-Thanks
Sangeetha
-Original Message-
From: Sangeetha Hariharan
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 1:38
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10046/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers, Hugo Trippaers, Wido den
Hollander
All,
The template_s3_ref table definition is no longer in the create-schema.sql
script. Without this table, the S3-backed secondary storage feature will not
function. I have created CLOUDSTACK-1745 [1] to track resolution of this
defect.
Thanks,
-John
[1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/bro
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10039/
---
(Updated March 20, 2013, 6 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Hugo Trippaers
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:52:34PM -0400, John Burwell wrote:
> All,
>
> The template_s3_ref table definition is no longer in the create-schema.sql
> script. Without this table, the S3-backed secondary storage feature will not
> function. I have created CLOUDSTACK-1745 [1] to track resolution
Chip,
Yes. I plan to submit a patch request tomorrow as I am otherwise tasked today.
Thanks,
-John
On Mar 20, 2013, at 2:02 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 01:52:34PM -0400, John Burwell wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> The template_s3_ref table definition is no longer in the create-s
Is this a new feature or did I miss the discussion around this?
On 20 March 2013 10:33, Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati
wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10039/
>
Hi Chip,
I created this bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1747
because I noticed yesterday in dev setup that after running mvn -P developer
-pl developer –Ddeploydb, my DB is still at 4.0 version, not expected 4.1
version. This is causing so much confusion to developers. We c
Members present: Animesh, topcloud, chipc, vogxn, jzb, sangeetha, Rayees,
__Parth__, aprateek, sudhap, Chandan, topcloud2, ke4qqq
Meeting summary:
1. Preface
2. Active Feature Release: Overall Status
a. Animesh to start a discussion on the list about baremeta
Min,
Between this issue and 1745, it may be prudent to give the create-schema.sql a
good once over to ensure that we don't have any other schema issues.
Thanks,
-John
On Mar 20, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Min Chen wrote:
> Hi Chip,
>
> I created this bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDST
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:08:01AM -0700, Min Chen wrote:
> Hi Chip,
>
> I created this bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1747
> because I noticed yesterday in dev setup that after running mvn -P developer
> -pl developer –Ddeploydb, my DB is still at 4.0 version, not expected
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:08:01AM -0700, Min Chen wrote:
> Hi Chip,
>
> I created this bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1747
> because I noticed yesterday in dev setup that after running mvn -P developer
> -pl developer –Ddeploydb, my DB is still at 4.0 version, not expected
Chip,
Based on Rohit's comments, the blocking defect I raised may not be a bug.
I will perform a rebuild tomorrow to determine if the template_s3_ref
table gets created properly.
Thanks,
-John
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:08:01AM -0700, M
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:36:10PM +0530, prasanna wrote:
> Is this a new feature or did I miss the discussion around this?
It seems to be a straight forward change, but what's the reasoning for
this Venkata?
Are the upgrade scenarios considered here?
>
> On 20 March 2013 10:33, Venkata Siva Vi
Pl see https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Database+Creator
Edit/add/modify wiki boldly in case something is confusing, missing.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:08:01AM -0700, Min Chen wrote:
>> Hi Chip,
>>
>> I created this
For 4.1, you deploydb (that would be 4.0 schema), run mgmt server
(dbupgradechecker should upgrade to 4.1). Starting 4.2, dbcreator
would do that (like on master) and cloud-setup-databases should call
dbcreator as well.
I tried to refactor the tool and upgrade classes, that did not work
smoothly f
Oh, i see. That means that this issue is not only specific to dev
environment, actually exists in QA environment as well. Basically QA
cannot verify DB schema without starting MS once.
I am consulting with Alex to see if we want to fix this in 4.1 or not.
Thanks for clarification. Chip, please hol
Hi Chip, Prasanna,
Yes, the change is pretty straightforward, the reasoning is to make default
password encoding more secure because the SHA256salted authenticator recently
added by Hugo salts the passwords while the existing MD5 authenticator doesn't,
and is the default. This change gives the
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10046/
---
(Updated March 20, 2013, 6:37 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childer
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10047/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers, Hugo Trippaers, Wido den
Hollander
Hi all,
A quick update... the board has *passed* our graduation resolution. We
are now a TLP. Congratulations! Awesome work everyone!
We are going to have to work through some infra related changes before
we make the official announcement to the world (i.e.: those that are not
on this mailing
Chip,
By reading Rohit's email and wiki, I understood current situation on
this
issue. Unlike I previously understood, this DB issue not only happens on
dev environment, but also happens on QA/production environment as well.
And this introduces a different behavior in 4.1 from previous 4.
Yay :-) Congratulations everyone!
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:42 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Graduation
Hi all,
A quick update... the board has *passed* our graduation resolution.
Awesome job, guys! This is a great project to be a part of. :)
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A quick update... the board has *passed* our graduation resolution. We
> are now a TLP. Congratulations! Awesome work everyone!
>
> We are going to have to work
Congratulation all!
-kd
>-Original Message-
>From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:45 AM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Graduation
>
>Yay :-) Congratulations everyone!
>
>-Original Message-
>From: C
woohooo! awesome news!
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti <
sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Yay :-) Congratulations everyone!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:42 AM
> To: cloudstack-
Congratulations!!
--Sheng
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti
wrote:
> Yay :-) Congratulations everyone!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:42 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> S
Cool, Awesome news!
-min
On 3/20/13 11:47 AM, "Sheng Yang" wrote:
>Congratulations!!
>
>--Sheng
>
>On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Sudha Ponnaganti
> wrote:
>> Yay :-) Congratulations everyone!
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>> Sent:
Hi Koushik,
Can you please confirm if the LB functionality (via VR or VPX) would be
supported in 4.2 or not?
Regards,
Manan Shah
On 3/19/13 5:00 AM, "Koushik Das" wrote:
>Inline
>
>>
>> On 18/03/13 7:37 PM, "Sailaja Mada" wrote:
>>
>> >+
>> >
>> >7) During Guest Network shutdown, Do we r
Corrected a typo, I meant "a different behavior in 4.1 from previous 4.0
release".
Thanks
-min
On 3/20/13 11:43 AM, "Min Chen" wrote:
>Chip,
>
> By reading Rohit's email and wiki, I understood current situation on
> this
>issue. Unlike I previously understood, this DB issue not only happ
Awesome news! Congratulations all!
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:42 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Graduation
Hi all,
A quick update... the board has *passed* our graduation resolution.
Great to hear the newsŠCongratulations...
Regards,
Manan Shah
On 3/20/13 11:52 AM, "Vijayendra Bhamidipati"
wrote:
>Awesome news! Congratulations all!
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:42 AM
>To: cloudsta
Well done everyone, and thank you Chip for your outstanding leadership
-sebastien
On Mar 20, 2013, at 2:56 PM, Manan Shah wrote:
> Great to hear the newsŠCongratulations...
>
> Regards,
> Manan Shah
>
>
>
>
> On 3/20/13 11:52 AM, "Vijayendra Bhamidipati"
> wrote:
>
>> Awesome news! Cong
Chip/David,
Sounds good to me. I've seen emails in the past that go to both lists (-dev
and -users). In this case would it be a good idea to draft an email per topic
and send out 1 email that copies both lists?
I'll get started on the conversions and then on the discussions after that.
Thank
That's such great news for the project and a strong endorsement of how we have
worked together successfully. Everyone should be so proud. Let us keep it up
as a TLP!
-kevin
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013
Awesome
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:42 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Graduation
>
> Hi all,
>
> A quick update... the board has *passed* our graduation resolution. We are
>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:43:30AM -0700, Min Chen wrote:
> Chip,
>
> By reading Rohit's email and wiki, I understood current situation on
> this
> issue. Unlike I previously understood, this DB issue not only happens on
> dev environment, but also happens on QA/production environment as we
Awesome! Congratulations everyone!!
-Prachi
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11:42 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Graduation
Hi all,
A quick update... the board has *passed* our graduation re
Fantastic
Well done to everybody involved in CloudStack.
Kind Regards
Giles
D: +44 20 3603 0541 | M: +44 796 111 2055
giles.sir...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: 20 March 2013 18:42
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Hi everyone,
We had a discussion on irc.
To implement something intermediary will be around the same effort as finishing
the job and there are various reasons why just running the create-schema.sql
and update*.sql is not enough. So we should just decide on finishing the job
in 4.1 or document
Hi everyone,
Has anyone every used the VI SDK or the VI Java API to create a VMFS
datastore that makes use of an iSCSI target?
I've been searching all over Google for some decent sample code. I've
found bits and pieces (more about NFS than iSCSI), but nothing that brings
it all together.
This w
Alex,
Given that we are 3 business days to the RC1 deadline, it seems to me that we
should pursue to lowest risk path possible. To my mind, that would be
reverting to the 4.0 behavior. Is there a way to revert to the previous
behavior for 4.1 and defer the entire enhancement to 4.2?
Based
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We had a discussion on irc.
>
> To implement something intermediary will be around the same effort as
> finishing the job and there are various reasons why just running the
> create-schema.sql and update*.sql is not enough. S
Congratulations !
Le 20/03/2013 18:41, Chip Childers a ecrit :
Hi all,
A quick update... the board has *passed* our graduation resolution. We
are now a TLP. Congratulations! Awesome work everyone!
We are going to have to work through some infra related changes before
we make the official an
John,
The code was in before deadline. I think you're looking at a commit where
Rohit tried to fix a problem with the developer deploy in the pom.xml. I had
previously thought even though the developer deploy had problems, the
production deploy was actually working. Turns out it wasn't.
--A
> My take on this is that we shouldn't do anything to 4.1 The people that
> matter (users) are taken care of when they start the MS - and that is a well-
> tested path.
> The only visible benefit for 4.1 is for developers/QA - and while I want
> everyone's life to be as easy as possible - last minu
Thanks Murali for the FS. Below are some questions/comments.
1. Is there a reason why we wouldn't support this feature for VPC?
2. Your FS talks about supporting EIP for Shared Networks as well. Are you
going to support that? If so, are you going to support it only when NS is
enabled as a LB servi
We have 1 blocker and 4 critical defects on baremetal
CLOUDSTACK-1610 Baremetal API addBaremetalPxeKickStartServer fail to prepare
PXE server causing create instance with Kickstart style image to fail
CLOUDSTACK-1440 Baremetal - Destroy VM fail due to
com.cloud.exception.OperationTimedoutExcep
Congratulations everyone! It's been an interesting path to graduation. Glad
to have shared this experience with this bunch!
Now on to my plan for world domination?
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 11
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 1:31 AM, Murali Reddy wrote:
> I would like to propose enhancing current EIP functionality (currently
> available in basic zone). I have made a case for this feature earlier [2] and
> captured requirements in the feature bug [2]. This proposal would like to
> introduce f
If I'm not mistaken, Edison had to accomplish this for his storage
framework in CS 4.2, so maybe he'll be able to shed some light on this
question. :)
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Has anyone every used the VI SDK or th
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10001/
---
(Updated March 20, 2013, 9:57 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Chip Chil
On Mar 20, 2013, at 12:54 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Might be nice to get a list of them and put it in the commit message.
> (e.g. if you commit the pt_BR translation, list all of the
> contributors in the commit message, that should be automatable.
Ok done the way you like it Sir….
Each langua
Murali,
Fix for CLOUDSTACK-1664 has not made it to 4.1 yet.
Using builds from master , I am able to see the events being generated when
creating account and for many other activities like starting Vms , creating
firewall rules:
| 94 | 7683e89f-2dc8-46a8-bb8e-4acf0c0bff53 | ACCOUNT.CREATE
I have updated the JIRA ticket as well as the requirements document.
Update the requirements to mention:
1. Made the feature requirements broader by covering all Hypervisors and
not just VMWare
2. Mentioned that the original requirements are for SG type feature with
more use cases but the primary
This is really awesome :-) Outstanding work everyone!
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: woensdag 20 maart 2013 22:43
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Graduation
>
> Congratulations everyone! It's been an interesting pa
We don't use VI SDK in CloudStack for VMware integration.
For VMFS datastore, CloudStack will not create it and will rely on vCenter
to do it. To enable a VMFS datastore involves a series of steps, the flow
is provided by vCenter.
Kelven
On 3/20/13 1:26 PM, "Mike Tutkowski" wrote:
>Hi everyone
Brilliant news. Well done everyone!
On 20 March 2013 18:41, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A quick update... the board has *passed* our graduation resolution. We
> are now a TLP. Congratulations! Awesome work everyone!
>
> We are going to have to work through some infra related changes b
Hi All,
Is there a way to remove the Primary Storage?
I’m running a clean devcloud on a VM with almost the latest code from the
Master branch (commit ba69ce0c8911eb7186774d2ddbae97483e65d48c from 3/19).
The only UI options I see for 2 Primary Storage instances I’ve added are:
- E
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:26:50AM -0700, Vijayendra Bhamidipati wrote:
> Hi Chip, Prasanna,
>
> Yes, the change is pretty straightforward, the reasoning is to make default
> password encoding more secure because the SHA256salted authenticator recently
> added by Hugo salts the passwords while t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10047/#review18184
---
Commit 88b750c8e4fbac21a19d28b15d25b60260163070 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10046/#review18185
---
Commit 88b750c8e4fbac21a19d28b15d25b60260163070 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10007/#review18186
---
Commit 88b750c8e4fbac21a19d28b15d25b60260163070 in branch refs/heads
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10046/#review18187
---
Ship it!
Applied to 4.1:
commit 88b750c8e4fbac21a19d28b15d25b60260
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:26:50AM -0700, Vijayendra Bhamidipati wrote:
>> Hi Chip, Prasanna,
>>
>> Yes, the change is pretty straightforward, the reasoning is to make default
>> password encoding more secure because the SHA256salted authent
As I mentioned, this is case with particular actions only. For e.g please
check crete user generates event?
On 21/03/13 4:01 AM, "Sangeetha Hariharan"
wrote:
>Murali,
>
>Fix for CLOUDSTACK-1664 has not made it to 4.1 yet.
>
>Using builds from master , I am able to see the events being generated
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10001/#review18189
---
Ship it!
Applied to 4.1, after having to do git apply instead of gi
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:31:05PM -0700, Sangeetha Hariharan wrote:
> Murali,
>
> Fix for CLOUDSTACK-1664 has not made it to 4.1 yet.
It is there in 4.1 now.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 08:42:17PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:26:50AM -0700, Vijayendra Bhamidipati wrote:
> >> Hi Chip, Prasanna,
> >>
> >> Yes, the change is pretty straightforward, the reasoning is to make
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 02:41:01PM -0700, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> We have 1 blocker and 4 critical defects on baremetal
>
> CLOUDSTACK-1610 Baremetal API addBaremetalPxeKickStartServer fail to
> prepare PXE server causing create instance with Kickstart style image to fail
>
> CLOUDSTA
Thanks, Kevlen
That makes sense that in pre 4.2 we don't use VI SDK to create a datastore
as we require the datastore to be set up ahead of creating Primary Storage.
However, as far as I understand Edison's 4.2 storage plug-in framework,
which creates the necessary storage when a VM is spun up or
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:52:26PM -0700, Manan Shah wrote:
> I have updated the JIRA ticket as well as the requirements document.
>
> Update the requirements to mention:
>
> 1. Made the feature requirements broader by covering all Hypervisors and
> not just VMWare
> 2. Mentioned that the origina
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
