Re: [Propose] Propose following features for 4.1 release.....

Hi, On 02/09/2013 04:41 AM, Ram Ganesh wrote: Hi, I would like to propose following features which are at various stages in the review board(hit review board by Jan 31st) for inclusion into 4.1 release. CLOUDSTACK-713 Limit Resources to domain/accounts - Achieved "Ship it" status but not sur

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.0.2-incubating

On 02/08/2013 07:23 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: Hey all, So - my initial plan was to shoot for monthly point releases, assuming that we had enough bugfixes, etc. to roll into a point release. Obviously, it took a bit longer than that to get the first one out the door. We have a few things that

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1088) EnableStaticNat error will clear the data in database

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9254/#review16387 --- The patch applies on 4.0 but not on master. Also could you use git fo

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-1088) EnableStaticNat error will clear the data in database

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13575138#comment-13575138 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-1088: -

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-1088) EnableStaticNat error will clear the data in database

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prasanna Santhanam updated CLOUDSTACK-1088: --- Affects Version/s: 4.1.0 > EnableStaticNat error will clear the data

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-999) Plugin to provide Hyper-V 2012 support

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13575141#comment-13575141 ] Donal Lafferty commented on CLOUDSTACK-999: --- Design doc shifted to 4.2. Clo

Re: First SF bay area cloudstack meetup!

Demo is a good idea. Because most of the companies know about CloudStack but few only are implementing, If Demo is recorded and posted then it wil be helpful for users and business. Regards Basha On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Manan Shah wrote: > I believe a demo would be a good thing as well

Re: [Propose] Propose following features for 4.1 release.....

On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi, > > > On 02/09/2013 04:41 AM, Ram Ganesh wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose following features which are at various stages in >> the review board(hit review board by Jan 31st) for inclusion into 4.1 >> release. >> >> CLOUD

Re: what's rule for using @Component and xml bean file

Please, please, please do note use spring packages. Spring should be a runtime and not compile time dependency. If you leave spring as a compile time dependency you'll ate On Feb 9, 2013, at 12:05 AM, Kelven Yang wrote: > > Apologize for such a long email first, if you are interested, plea

Re: what's rule for using @Component and xml bean file

Sorry, technical error in sending the last email... Please, please, please do note use spring packages. Spring should be a runtime and not compile time dependency. If you leave spring as a compile time dependency you'll see overtime that developers start leveraging handy spring utilities and comp

Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1

On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:32:02PM -0500, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Hey guys, > > Just a quick note before the weekend with a status update on RPM. > > The management server package is pretty much done and installation > on a clean system works like a charm. This is actually tested every > few hour

Re: [Propose] Propose following features for 4.1 release.....

On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 07:47:39PM +0530, Ram Ganesh wrote: > On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > On 02/09/2013 04:41 AM, Ram Ganesh wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I would like to propose following features which are at various stages in > >> the review bo

RE: [DISCUSS][INFRA] Setting up gerrit

-1 I'm all for peer review, let me get that straight. Part of the responsibility of being a committer is to ensure the quality of the code that goes in, however i don't think that have a formal process like gerrit is necessary. We are all looking at the code and the commits that are coming in w

Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1

On 02/08/2013 06:32 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: Hey guys, Just a quick note before the weekend with a status update on RPM. The management server package is pretty much done and installation on a clean system works like a charm. This is actually tested every few hours with a Jenkins setup a c

RE: [DISCUSS][INFRA] Setting up gerrit

I second what Hugo mentioned here. Also , from my perspective as well , since I have been extensively involved in contributing to the UI component for CloudStack and given the fact that very few people have been managing this part of the code , it would make situation very tough for us as well .

Re: [DISCUSS][INFRA] Setting up gerrit

-1 for reasons listed by others. I think Gerrit's great, and I like the idea of peer code reviews, but my gut feel is this doesn't gel well with an open source project (happy to review examples where it's being used…) Coud we maybe enable gerrit for specific pieces of code? e.g. we should proba

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-1203) Fail to create advance zone with SG enabled when UI allows SG enabled option

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] angeline shen closed CLOUDSTACK-1203. - Resolution: Later implementation not ready > Fail to create advance

Re: [VOTE] Revert back to old mailing list mechanism, which would add "Reply-To: mailing list" to every mail it send out

+1 (binding) to revert.  Note that, had I replied in Mutt rather than my Webmail client, the default behavior would have been to just send my reply directly to Sheng rather than the ML. When I'm replying to a mailing list, I expect "reply" to send my reply to the mailing list, and not the initia

Re: Unable to login into UI after successful installation and start

Hi, I am using Centos 6.3 64 bit OS VM. Yes, I am building from source. The link to the log file is log error.log . The Management server and the DB is on the same machine. I have tried reinstalling the packages with Mysql, but of no use. I have followed the same steps

RE: Unable to login into UI after successful installation and start

Can you give some more details about your environment ? I think , few people had tried using Centos 6.3 from the latest 4.0 code and it was building fine for them . After looking at the logs , what I can understand is that this error comes - If CloudStack has included an older version of common

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-625) 3rd Party Plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pranav Saxena updated CLOUDSTACK-625: - Fix Version/s: (was: 4.1.0) 4.2.0 > 3rd Party Plugin > ---

RE: '[PROPOSAL]' Third party plugins

Moved both of them to 4.2. Thanks, Pranav -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 3:13 AM To: Brian Federle Cc: David Nalley; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Sonny Chhen Subject: Re: '[PROPOSAL]' Third party plugin

RE: Unable to login into UI after successful installation and start

Yes, please provide more info. Devcloud-kvm is centos 6.3 and it worked fine with the 4.0.1 that was recently cut. On Feb 10, 2013 12:08 AM, "Pranav Saxena" wrote: > Can you give some more details about your environment ? I think , few > people had tried using Centos 6.3 from the latest 4.0 code