[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-369) ASF 4.0 - unable to support XenServer 6.1 host

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Devdeep Singh resolved CLOUDSTACK-369. -- Resolution: Fixed > ASF 4.0 - unable to support XenServer 6.1 host > --

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-576) PaaS Enablement: Composite Application Blueprints

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13528868#comment-13528868 ] Alex Heneveld commented on CLOUDSTACK-576: -- Thanks all. Great comments Jie.

Review Request: Property file fix for AWSAPI db(cloudbridge)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8464/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Damle. Description --- For any EC2

Review Request: Property file fix for AWSAPI db(cloudbridge)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8464/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Damle. Description --- For any EC2

Re: [DISCUSS][DOCS] Conventions for docbook xml filenames to be ready for translation

No objections have been raised. I edited: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/How+To+Work+With+CloudStack+Documentation to make mention of this convention The patches have been applied by Joe: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=18d759

Review Request: Provide DescribeKeyPairs Query API support in CS AWSAPI.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8465/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Damle. Description --- As a part o

Review Request: [EC2 Query API] RevokeSecurityGroupIngress fails with 'EC2ResponseError'.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8466/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Damle. Description --- In AWSAPI w

Re: Review Request: [AWSAPI] Property file fix for AWSAPI db(cloudbridge)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8464/ --- (Updated Dec. 11, 2012, 11:35 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Dam

Re: Review Request: [EC2 Query API] Provide DescribeKeyPairs Query API support in CS AWSAPI.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8465/ --- (Updated Dec. 11, 2012, 11:36 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Dam

Review Request: [EC2 Query API] AuthorizeSecurityGroupIngress fails with 'Server.InternalError 431 Invalid protocol' error.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8468/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Damle. Description --- Before maki

Review Request: [EC2 Query API] AttachVolume fails with 'Permission Denied: Invalid Signature' error.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8480/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Damle. Description --- In AWSAPI w

Review Request: [EC2 Query API] RunInstance and DescribeInstances throw NumberFormatException error when called using AWS Java SDK

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8483/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Damle. Description --- AWS Java SD

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-605) Host physical CPU is incorrectly calculated for Vmware hosts

Koushik Das created CLOUDSTACK-605: -- Summary: Host physical CPU is incorrectly calculated for Vmware hosts Key: CLOUDSTACK-605 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-605 Project: Cloud

Review Request: [EC2 Query API] DescribeAddresses fails with Null Pointer Exception.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8492/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Damle. Description --- As a part o

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-605: Host physical CPU is incorrectly calculated for Vmware hosts

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8511/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Kelven Yang. Description --- There is a m

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-605) Host physical CPU is incorrectly calculated for Vmware hosts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13528933#comment-13528933 ] Koushik Das commented on CLOUDSTACK-605: Review posted https://reviews.apache.

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-605) Host physical CPU is incorrectly calculated for Vmware hosts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13528951#comment-13528951 ] gavin lee commented on CLOUDSTACK-605: -- Not sure why this issue re-occured. Sinc

Review Request: [EC2 Query API] AuthorizeSecurityGroupIngress and RevokeSecurityGroupIngress return false even when the request is successful.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8513/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prachi Damle. Description --- If the resp

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-605) Host physical CPU is incorrectly calculated for Vmware hosts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13529005#comment-13529005 ] Koushik Das commented on CLOUDSTACK-605: The fix for CS-16863 is not yet merge

Re: feature wish-list

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Kelcey Damage (BBITS) wrote: > I have not heard back on that, its sitting in the UK right now :) > > So we can merge the two when it becomes available. I just sent an email to Giles, asking for the list. > -kd > > > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vi

RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-605) Host physical CPU is incorrectly calculated for Vmware hosts

Any chance of this fix being rolled into 4.0.1? -Original Message- From: Koushik Das (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 9:31 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-605) Host physical CPU is incorrectly calculated f

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-605) Host physical CPU is incorrectly calculated for Vmware hosts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13529057#comment-13529057 ] Musayev, Ilya commented on CLOUDSTACK-605: -- Any chance of this fix being roll

RE: CentOS System VM?

I understand, but the concern when we were talking was that there's no clear upgrade path from the free/community version to the paid. The free version would require cloudstack to configure it, and as I mentioned the main draw of the paid version aside from support is that the user has an API to co

Re: Review Request: [EC2 Query API] AuthorizeSecurityGroupIngress fails with 'Server.InternalError 431 Invalid protocol' error.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8468/#review14295 --- CLOUDSTACK-197 is the generic Query API bug - but doesn't have anythi

Re: Citrix-branded files in source tree?

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012, at 10:57 PM, John Kinsella wrote: > Think I know the answer to this, but asking before I remove things from > the source tree - > > Over the weekend I pulled up the CS web UI under an unknown set of > circumstances that resulted in me seeing Citrix CloudPlatform branding on

RE: Citrix-branded files in source tree?

Joe, I still see one image which has a cloudplatform logo - "bg-what-is-cloudplatform.png" in the latest 4.0 branch . We could remove this one ! Regards, Pranav -Original Message- From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 8:54 AM To: cloudstack-d

RE: feature wish-list

Hi all Sorry, I've been meaning to post this list here since getting back from LV. This was a set of feature requests that we worked up in the session I did at collab. Some of these are very specific features, whereas some are more general. We did a very unscientific poll of hands in the room to

RE: Citrix-branded files in source tree?

Ok , I just now removed that specific citrix-branded image from the 4.0 branch . Here is the commit link - Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-cloudstack/commit/d46cce2b I don't think, apart from the one I just now deleted , there exists any more branded logos . And just

RE: Review Request: [EC2 Query API] AuthorizeSecurityGroupIngress fails with 'Server.InternalError 431 Invalid protocol' error.

Sure David. I will create bugs under the umbrella ticket CLOUDSTACK-197 to correspond to each of the EC2 Query API issue. Regarding unit tests, from the following mail thread http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-cloudstack-dev/201210.mbox/<7914B38A4445B34AA16EB9F1352942F1012F109D6

System vms failing to start

Howdy folks, I am hoping someone can point me in the right direction. I have a cloudstack 3.0.2 installation on oel6.2 and I am trying to bring my system vms up on a kvm system also running oel6.2. This environment is firewalled from the internet, so i'm unable to easily grab updates, etc from

Re: pluggable storage implementation

There are a few snags, there are times when we get the storage pool by asking LibvirtStorageAdaptor, in which case I don't know the adaptor type to pass to KVMStoragePoolManager. For example: secondaryStoragePool = _storagePoolMgr.getStoragePoolByURI(secondaryStorageUrl); In this case it parses t

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-265) provide option to turn-off automatic public IP association for each VM when using EIP service.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Murali Reddy resolved CLOUDSTACK-265. - Resolution: Fixed This feature has been checked in to master. This commit - introd

Re: pluggable storage implementation

There are also some commands that don't pass StorageFilerTO, but just a uuid of a storage pool (primaryStoragePoolNameLabel), I'm assuming those will need to be reworked to pass either a type or the whole StorageFilerTO? On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > There are a few

IRC meeting tomorrow

A reminder - we have the weekly CloudStack IRC meeting tomorrow at 17:00 UTC tomorrow in #CloudStack-Meeting. I'm attending USENIX LISA this week, so I'm going to have to miss the meeting - anybody willing to step up to chair the meeting + make sure that we send minutes to the list + minutes/log o

Re: IRC meeting tomorrow

I can run it tomorrow On Dec 11, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > A reminder - we have the weekly CloudStack IRC meeting tomorrow at 17:00 > UTC tomorrow in #CloudStack-Meeting. > > I'm attending USENIX LISA this week, so I'm going to have to miss the > meeting - anybody willing to s

Re: feature wish-list

Thanks, I'll go through this today and post to the wiki. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 11, 2012, at 9:05 AM, Giles Sirett wrote: > Hi all > Sorry, I've been meaning to post this list here since getting back from LV. > This was a set of feature requests that we worked up in the session I did at

Re: IRC meeting tomorrow

I will be in and out of the meeting. I am on transit at that time, so I'm a slave to train reception. Sent from my iPhone On Dec 11, 2012, at 10:09 AM, John Kinsella wrote: > I can run it tomorrow > > On Dec 11, 2012, at 10:05 AM, Joe Brockmeier > wrote: > >> A reminder - we have the weekly

Re: pluggable storage implementation

Here's a list according to what's in LibvirtComputingResource of things that would need to either pass a pool type or a StorageFilerTO: CreateVolumeFromSnapshotCommand CreatePrivateTemplateFromVolumeCommand PrimaryStorageDownloadCommand Shall I overload these to allow an optional pool type to be

new committer: Min Chen

The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Min Chen to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This

Re: new committer: Min Chen

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > > The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack > has asked Min Chen to become a committer and we are pleased to > announce that they have accepted. > > Being a committer enables easier contribution to the > project since

RE: new committer: Min Chen

Congrats Min ! Regards, Pranav -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 11:22 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: new committer: Min Chen On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > > The Pod

RE: new committer: Min Chen

Congratulations Min Animesh -Original Message- From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 11:20 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: new committer: Min Chen The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has as

Re: new committer: Min Chen

High five Min! No more awesome review requests, just commits :) -- Rohit On 11-Dec-2012, at 11:19 AM, Alex Huang wrote: > > The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack > has asked Min Chen to become a committer and we are pleased to > announce that they have accepted

Re: new committer: Min Chen

Congrats! On 11 December 2012 19:19, Alex Huang wrote: > > The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack > has asked Min Chen to become a committer and we are pleased to > announce that they have accepted. > > Being a committer enables easier contribution to the > projec

Re: pluggable storage implementation

Alright, I reworked the SnapshotCommand related commands that extended it to use the actual StoragePool rather than only passing a uuid, and changed the few spots in the server code that was creating new commands. I didn't change any existing accessors (just added getPool()) so the various existing

Review Request: Refactor ListProjectsCmd and ProjectResponse.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8532/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav. Description --- Refactor Lis

Welcome Shashi Sastry from Vyatta

Dear CS Community, Please join me in welcoming Shashi from Vyatta. Hopefully she can help us with adding Vyatta network offering to CS. Looking forward to working with you. Regards Ilya

RE: Welcome Shashi Sastry from Vyatta

Ditto, welcome. -kd -Original Message- From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 1:13 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Welcome Shashi Sastry from Vyatta Dear CS Community, Please join me in welcoming Shashi from Vyatta. Hopeful

RE: Welcome Shashi Sastry from Vyatta

Welcome Shashi Animesh -Original Message- From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 1:13 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Welcome Shashi Sastry from Vyatta Dear CS Community, Please join me in welcoming Shashi from Vyatta. Hopef

Re: Review Request: Refactor ListProjectsCmd and ProjectResponse.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8532/#review14315 --- Ship it! Applied in api_refactoring; commit 8735716ba02c89dfd33ad86

is vhd-util needed in the development environment and if yes, where to put it.

I ran into the exception: "com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: can not create vdi in sr ..." when trying to deploy the system vm on a XenServer host. One of the old jira issue

Review Request: Allow for custom storage adaptors based on pool type in KVM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8534/ --- Review request for cloudstack and edison su. Description --- This is a refa

RE: [DISCUSS] Adjust JIRA to send out less mails (e.g. only about issue creation, status changes etc.)

Markmail archives and indexes all emails sent to cloudstack-dev. http://markmail.org/search/?q=list%3Aorg.apache.incubator.cloudstack-dev Once the discussion is settled we can put a markmail search link for that discussion back into Jira -Original Message- From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.

Review Request: Refactor ListProjectAccountCmd and ProjectAccountResponse.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8537/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav. Description --- Refactor Lis

Re: Review Request: Refactor ListProjectAccountCmd and ProjectAccountResponse.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8537/#review14333 --- Ship it! Applied in api_refactoring: commit 9c93fee0dcde2927d9819cf

[DISCUSS] Adding new features to CloudStack

Folks I was reviewing the wiki on Adding New Features https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Adding+new+features+and+design+documents to Cloudstack, and I was wondering that a feature proposal can come from a user who is not necessary planning to develop it themselves. In orde

Review Request: Move id field from BaseViewVO to individual VO classes to fix DAO layer search bug.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8538/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav. Description --- Move id fiel

Re: Review Request: Move id field from BaseViewVO to individual VO classes to fix DAO layer search bug.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8538/#review14344 --- Ship it! Applied in api_refactoring; commit 3661f7f99293838d18b5332

Re: Review Request: Move id field from BaseViewVO to individual VO classes to fix DAO layer search bug.

> On Dec. 12, 2012, 1:38 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Applied in api_refactoring; > > > > commit 3661f7f99293838d18b53326b43cd486456ec60f > > Author: Min Chen > > Date: Tue Dec 11 17:14:14 2012 -0800 > > > > Fix several bugs of new refactored list apis. Thanks for the fix Min! Verified

RE: Welcome Shashi Sastry from Vyatta

Thank you all for your welcome. It is my privilege to be working with this community. Shashi -Original Message- From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 1:13 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Welcome Shashi Sastry from Vyatta Dea

RE: is vhd-util needed in the development environment and if yes, where to put it.

Refer to: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/How+to+build+on+master+branch You need download vhd-util and copy it to the right directory manually. Regards Mice -Original Message- From: Kanzhe Jiang [mailto:kanzhe.ji...@bigswitch.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 20

CentOS System Offering Thread

I'd like to resurrect this thread - as the other thread got carried away into Vyatta conversation. My reasoning behind this move - is due to e1000 bug that affects Debian Wheezy, vSphere 5.0 (and possibly newer 5.1) and the router VM in Advanced Network Zone. While I could spent lots of time tr

RE: new committer: Min Chen

Congrats Min. -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 12:52 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: new committer: Min Chen On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Alex Huang wrote: > > The Podling Project Man

Re: CentOS System Offering Thread

This is pretty important. Anyone should be able to roll their own, rather than relying on a single potentially out-of-date image. It seems like it would be pretty simple and straightforward on the face of it, however many of the scripts have been written specifically for Debian. I'd honestly be ok

Review Request: Refactor ListProjectInvitationsCmd and ProjectInvitationResponse.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8541/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav. Description --- Refactor Lis