Re: Reminder: IRC Meeting Wednesday (October 17) at 17:00 UTC

Hi, I guys. I probably won't be able to make it this time. GigaOm Structure Europe is still going on and I'll be hanging out there. Wido On 16-10-12 15:35, Joe Brockmeier wrote: This is your friendly reminder that we have a weekly IRC meeting this Wednesday at 17:00 UTC. That's 13:00 Eastern

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-102: Update packaging and installation sections

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7635/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers, John Kinsella, and Alex Huang. Des

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-102) INSTALL.txt needs to be updated before ASF4 relesae

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13477719#comment-13477719 ] Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-102: Updated INSTALL.md and sent for revie

Re: what is the plan for the build system?

Hi, On 16-10-12 10:45, Noa Resare wrote: Hello friends, I've been tasked with looking into the possibility of running cloudstack on Debian stable, and based on my preliminary investigations I have a few questions that I hope that someone can answer. I've been trying the same, but I gave up.

Some processes are missing in development environment document?

Hi, I tried to read the following document and setup development environment. http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/develop/environment.html I am using CentOS6.3. And I think that some required processes are missing in document. 1. Need to install Maven It is not installed although maven is exe

Re:Re: kvm lacking of GetDomRVersionCmd implementation lead to deployVm fail.

you are right. getDomRVersionCmd is implemented. but there is problem in debug environment. in my case(ant debug) , user=root, no 'developer=true' column in configuratoin table. these two conditions will ignore producting id_rsa.cloud . so ssh to systemVM throught identity file alway

Review Request: Fix for Defect-344 (location for many of the cloud-* tools is updated)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7636/ --- Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley, Chip Childers, Jessica Tomechak, and

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CLOUDSTACK-344) Docs still point to old location for many of the cloud-* tools

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13475965#comment-13475965 ] Radhika Nair edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-344 at 10/17/12 10:13 AM:

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-365) Documentation has wrong path to cloud-install-sys-tmplt

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jakub Wojcik updated CLOUDSTACK-365: Description: The latest documentation build (docs-4.0 , #141) contains wrong path to t

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-365) Documentation has wrong path to cloud-install-sys-tmplt

Jakub Wojcik created CLOUDSTACK-365: --- Summary: Documentation has wrong path to cloud-install-sys-tmplt Key: CLOUDSTACK-365 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-365 Project: CloudStac

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

Chip, I had these notes while testing, that I was going to send out in a summary email... Looking at target/rat.txt What are these files doing here: N docs/publican-cloudstack/LICENSE N docs/publican-cloudstack/NOTICE ALtools/marvin/CHANGES.txt N tools/marvin/LICENSE.txt

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > Chip, I had these notes while testing, that I was going to send out in a > summary email... > > Looking at target/rat.txt > > What are these files doing here: > > N docs/publican-cloudstack/LICENSE > N docs/publican-cloudstack/NOTIC

Re: [DOC] Hypervisor support in 4.0: documentation question

On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > I have noticed discussion on the list about moving some hypervisor code to > the plugins directory. Please pardon me for not following all discussions > on dev- too closely, but I'm wondering how this affects documentation. > > Are we supp

Re: [Maven] How to build on master

2012/10/11 Rohit Yadav : > With some minor build fixes I'm able to build, deploydb and debug using Maven > now. Pl. start using master branch as Hugo suggested so we can weed out > issues with maven. > > Updated: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Building+with+Maven#Buildi

Re: [Maven] How to build on master

Hi Oliver, On 17-Oct-2012, at 6:46 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > 2012/10/11 Rohit Yadav : >> With some minor build fixes I'm able to build, deploydb and debug using >> Maven now. Pl. start using master branch as Hugo suggested so we can weed >> out issues with maven. >> >> Updated: >> https://cw

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 08:56:07AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > > Chip, I had these notes while testing, that I was going to send out in a > > summary email... > > > > Looking at target/rat.txt > > > > What are these files doing here: > > > >

RE: Egress firewall rules for guest network.

I am updating egress firewall rules FS with the createNetworkACL. Thanks, Jayapal > -Original Message- > From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 10:28 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Anthony Xu > Subject: Re: Egress fir

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 08:56:07AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Noah Slater wrote: >> > Chip, I had these notes while testing, that I was going to send out in a >> > summary email... >> > >> > Looking at

How to hide /disable project view button

Dear all, Do you know how to hide/disable "Project View" button? Best Regards, Lucy

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 08:56:07AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Noah Slater wrote: >> > Chip, I had these notes while testing, that I was going to send out in a >> > summary email... >> > >> > Looking at

Re: How to hide /disable project view button

The easiest way is hide the entrance from UI, this can be done by change the js file or hide the div. eg: comment projects in cloudstack.js, hide project-view div, etc. You'd better look through the code, change and test. On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 5:23 PM, lucy wrote: > Dear all, > > > > > > > >

Re: what is the plan for the build system?

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > The work I done on the Debian packages makes sure they work on Ubuntu > 12.04 and on Debian Unstable. I think that is perfectly reasonable. If we determine that it is a viable solution to backport what is needed to Debian Squeeze I w

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

On 17 October 2012 13:56, Chip Childers wrote: > > > ALtools/marvin/CHANGES.txt > > N tools/marvin/LICENSE.txt > > ALtools/marvin/MANIFEST.in > > Marvin is a stand-alone tool really. That's why they are there. Can you clarify what you mean? I can't find this license in the ro

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > On 17 October 2012 13:56, Chip Childers wrote: > >> >> > ALtools/marvin/CHANGES.txt >> > N tools/marvin/LICENSE.txt >> > ALtools/marvin/MANIFEST.in >> >> Marvin is a stand-alone tool really. That's why they are there. > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

Hmm. Why bother putting the LICENSE.txt or CHANGES.txt there at all? (I have never had to deal with a sub-project in the root of a larger project at the ASF.) Is it intended to be built out of the source, and shipped separately? On 17 October 2012 16:45, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 20

RE: [4.1 feature RFC] L4-L7 network services in shared network

Hi, Here is my list of comments/queries after reviewing the FS. (1) when the shared n/w scope is set to "domain/project", how is the external device allocation happen? Is it going to be dedicated to domain/project if we select "dedicated" during n/w offering creation ? I have this question bec

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > Hmm. Why bother putting the LICENSE.txt or CHANGES.txt there at all? (I > have never had to deal with a sub-project in the root of a larger project > at the ASF.) Is it intended to be built out of the source, and > shipped separately? > Yes

Re: [Doc] Review request: Is the System Requirements doc correct?

According to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/ASF+CS+4.0+QA, Ubuntu 12.04 was tested rather than 10.04 On 10/17/12 5:59 PM, "Jessica Tomechak" wrote: >Need to double-check these system requirements before shipping the docs. >For example, I see Ubuntu 12.04 in the list. I n

Re: [Doc] Review request: Is the System Requirements doc correct?

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > Need to double-check these system requirements before shipping the docs. > For example, I see Ubuntu 12.04 in the list. I notice the email threads > where Wido mentions he added this support. But has that been tested? > > 3.3.1. Managemen

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

Interesting. Is it something we'd want to create a sub-project for eventually, or is it fine where it is? It might be a good idea to copy a DISCLAIMER file into this package too then? On 17 October 2012 16:56, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > > Hmm.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Interesting. Is it something we'd want to create a sub-project for > eventually, or is it fine where it is? > > It might be a good idea to copy a DISCLAIMER file into this package too > then? It might become a sub-project at some point - but

[Doc] Missing hardware requirements in KVM install section?

Just noticed that in the KVM installation section, which was not just converted to XML but substantially rewritten by a contributor, the following hardware requirements from the older guide were omitted. Can anyone please confirm whether these still apply to Apache CloudStack 4.0? Hosts must be ce

Re: [Doc] Missing hardware requirements in KVM install section?

I doubt I am adding clarity, but comments are inline. On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > Just noticed that in the KVM installation section, which was not just > converted to XML but substantially rewritten by a contributor, the > following hardware requirements from the

Re: [Maven] How to build on master

2012/10/17 Rohit Yadav : > Hi Oliver, > > On 17-Oct-2012, at 6:46 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > >> 2012/10/11 Rohit Yadav : >>> With some minor build fixes I'm able to build, deploydb and debug using >>> Maven now. Pl. start using master branch as Hugo suggested so we can weed >>> out issues with ma

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

Ah, sorry, a separate repo makes much more sense. :) However, the only thing I have to say about this with my mentor hat on is that if we're treating this as a separate package, it should include the Incubation DISCLAIMER. On 17 October 2012 17:07, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-366) Add DISCLAIMER to marvin

David Nalley created CLOUDSTACK-366: --- Summary: Add DISCLAIMER to marvin Key: CLOUDSTACK-366 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-366 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Ah, sorry, a separate repo makes much more sense. :) > > However, the only thing I have to say about this with my mentor hat on is > that if we're treating this as a separate package, it should include the > Incubation DISCLAIMER. Agreed - pu

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-366) Add DISCLAIMER to marvin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chip Childers resolved CLOUDSTACK-366. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: pre-4.0.0) 4.0.

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-366) Add DISCLAIMER to marvin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chip Childers closed CLOUDSTACK-366. > Add DISCLAIMER to marvin > > > Key: CLOUDSTA

RE: what is the plan for the build system?

> -Original Message- > From: Noa Resare [mailto:n...@spotify.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 8:15 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: what is the plan for the build system? > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Wido den Hollander > wrote: > > > The work

Re: [4.1 feature RFC] L4-L7 network services in shared network

Murali, I've added some comments inline, please review. On 10/17/12 8:56 AM, "Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru" wrote: >Hi, > >Here is my list of comments/queries after reviewing the FS. > >(1) when the shared n/w scope is set to "domain/project", how is the >external device allocation happen? Is it

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

Danke! On 17 October 2012 17:28, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > > Ah, sorry, a separate repo makes much more sense. :) > > > > However, the only thing I have to say about this with my mentor hat on is > > that if we're treating this as a separate p

RE: [Doc] Missing hardware requirements in KVM install section?

> -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 9:21 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [Doc] Missing hardware requirements in KVM install section? > > I doubt I am adding clarity, but comments are inline. > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

On Oct 17, 2012, at 6:07 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >> Interesting. Is it something we'd want to create a sub-project for >> eventually, or is it fine where it is? >> >> It might be a good idea to copy a DISCLAIMER file into this package too

Re: [4.1 feature RFC] Optional Public IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone

Murali, some comments: 1) "During network design phase of network creation, 'Direct network Guru' which designs the shared networks shall setup the network to be in Network.State.Allocated if shared network is being created in advanced zone and with L4-L7 services enabled" Can you explain why? A

Re: what is the plan for the build system?

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Noa Resare [mailto:n...@spotify.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 8:15 AM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: what is the plan for the build system? >> >> On Wed, Oct 17, 20

RE: Re:Re: kvm lacking of GetDomRVersionCmd implementation lead to deployVm fail.

There is a hack: http://markmail.org/message/bf5pbgxxpcsx76zu > -Original Message- > From: coudstacks [mailto:cloudsta...@163.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:26 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re:Re: kvm lacking of GetDomRVersionCmd implementation lead to

RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the SRX

Hi Jayapal, In SRX , we do not support firewall except in cases where we have to open the ports for Static NAT. This being the case , On any acquired Ip address which does NOT have a static NAT rule enabled, when user tries to open up a firewall , API should error out. There should be no entry

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, second round

On Oct 17, 2012, at 6:07 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >> Interesting. Is it something we'd want to create a sub-project for >> eventually, or is it fine where it is? >> >> It might be a good idea to copy a DISCLAIMER file into this package too

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-367) CLI

Kevin Kluge created CLOUDSTACK-367: -- Summary: CLI Key: CLOUDSTACK-367 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-367 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: New Feature Affects Versio

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-367) CLI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13478085#comment-13478085 ] edison su commented on CLOUDSTACK-367: -- +1, add a requirement: the CLI needs to s

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-367) CLI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13478088#comment-13478088 ] David Nalley commented on CLOUDSTACK-367: - Before we reinvent the wheel - lets

Re: Question on Ubuntu 12.04 support

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > Is the Ubuntu 12.04 support just for KVM hosts, as the feature page in the > wiki implies? Or can you also run management server on it? > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.0+Release You can also run ma

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-367) CLI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13478092#comment-13478092 ] Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-367: and use/create a wrapper/shell over c

RE: Question on Ubuntu 12.04 support

Yes, we can run management server on Ubuntu 12.04; DevCloud (dom0) is Ubuntu 12.04. From: Jessica Tomechak [jessica.tomec...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:36 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Question on Ubuntu 12.04 supp

RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-367) CLI

+1 for having a good CLI. From a CloudStack user perspective (not admin), I found that the UI does not expose all the functions in the API. And it is not easy for a user to create signed API calls. I have not used the existing CLI tool because it is only referenced in docs, but unclear where t

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-367) CLI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13478103#comment-13478103 ] Jie Feng commented on CLOUDSTACK-367: - +1 for having a good CLI. >From a CloudSt

Drop OVM in 4.0?

Hi All, Due to the bug http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-16488 and the license issue(some files related to OVM are removed on 4.0 branch(https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=7f8a1aabbf9b6764780e0c2ad870009cc2d4)), OVM is not supported on 4.0 bra

RE: Drop OVM in 4.0?

Could OVM be made a hot fix post 4.0 release, but not held to the official 4.1? KELCEY DAMAGE Infrastructure Systems Architect www.backbonetechnology.com - kel...@bbits.ca address: 55 East 7th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5T 1M4

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-367) CLI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] edison su reassigned CLOUDSTACK-367: Assignee: Rohit Yadav It's your show time:) > CLI > --- > >

RE: Drop OVM in 4.0?

OVM is broken in 4.0 even these patches don't have license issue. It takes a while to fix. I vote to dropping it from 4.0 > -Original Message- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:26 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: cloud

RE: Drop OVM in 4.0?

Possible, as the OVM code is in its own separate folder, the OVM fix will not impact other code at all. We can have 4.0.x release to fix OVM. > -Original Message- > From: Kelcey Damage (BBITS) [mailto:kel...@bbits.ca] > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:28 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incub

RE: Drop OVM in 4.0?

I agree and vote to drop. But am just wondering if it really needs to wait until official 4.1 to get added back in? or could it be hotfixed at somepoint? KELCEY DAMAGE Infrastructure Systems Architect www.backbonetechnology.com -

RE: Drop OVM in 4.0?

I think this is the best outcome and compromise. +1 -Original Message- From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:38 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Drop OVM in 4.0? Possible, as t

Re: Drop OVM in 4.0?

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Frank Zhang wrote: > OVM is broken in 4.0 even these patches don't have license issue. It takes a > while to fix. > I vote to dropping it from 4.0 Aside from the licensing issues - what are the issues that keep OVM from working in 4.0? Can we get bugs filed for t

RE: [jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-367) CLI

+1 for me, I can be guiney pig when test version comes and participate on dev to best of my abilities. -Original Message- From: edison su (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 2:36 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTA

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-367) CLI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13478217#comment-13478217 ] Musayev, Ilya commented on CLOUDSTACK-367: -- +1 for me, I can be guiney pig wh

RE: Drop OVM in 4.0?

There are bugs in bugs.cloudstack.org for these issues. Not sure if needs to duplicate on ASF bugzliia > -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:41 AM > To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org > Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.a

Re: Drop OVM in 4.0?

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Frank Zhang wrote: > There are bugs in bugs.cloudstack.org for these issues. > Not sure if needs to duplicate on ASF bugzliia > bugs.cs.o is deprecated and no longer has anything to do with Apache CloudStack (and is imminently going away), so if it is a bug with C

RE: Drop OVM in 4.0?

In the process of logging it in to ASF as well. -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:52 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Drop OVM in 4.0? On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-368) OVM - cannot create guest VM

angeline shen created CLOUDSTACK-368: Summary: OVM - cannot create guest VM Key: CLOUDSTACK-368 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-368 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: B

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-369) ASF 4.0 - unable to support XenServer 6.1 host

angeline shen created CLOUDSTACK-369: Summary: ASF 4.0 - unable to support XenServer 6.1 host Key: CLOUDSTACK-369 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-369 Project: CloudStack

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-368) OVM - cannot create guest VM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13478254#comment-13478254 ] angeline shen commented on CLOUDSTACK-368: -- Referencehttp://bugs.cloudsta

RE: Drop OVM in 4.0?

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-368 -Original Message- From: Sudha Ponnaganti Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:54 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Drop OVM in 4.0? In the process of logging it in to AS

Re: [2/2] git commit: Docs: Add the sections on building from code to the Install Guide. The files were contributed, but never included in the book. This caused a build error as well as missing inform

http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/view/master/job/build-docs-install-master/143/ This broke the install guide build. On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:47 PM, wrote: > Docs: Add the sections on building from code to the Install Guide. The files > were contributed, but never included in the book. This cau

Re: what is the plan for the build system?

+1 - this makes the most sense to me. It might take a little more effort, but a seamless result would be well worth it IMHO. On Oct 17, 2012, at 10:13 AM, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Edison Su wrote: >> >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Noa Resare [mailt

RE: [2/2] git commit: Docs: Add the sections on building from code to the Install Guide. The files were contributed, but never included in the book. This caused a build error as well as missing inform

Actually it was to fix the build...it worked for me locally. Before, the error was something like "can't find sect-source-buildrpm" and now it's "sect-source-buildrpm already defined." I'll check into it. Jessica T. CloudStack Tech Pubs -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da.

Re: [2/2] git commit: Docs: Add the sections on building from code to the Install Guide. The files were contributed, but never included in the book. This caused a build error as well as missing inform

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > Actually it was to fix the build...it worked for me locally. Before, the > error was something like "can't find sect-source-buildrpm" and now it's > "sect-source-buildrpm already defined." I'll check into it. The build 5 minutes before

RE: [2/2] git commit: Docs: Add the sections on building from code to the Install Guide. The files were contributed, but never included in the book. This caused a build error as well as missing inform

Maybe somebody else fixed it at the same time as me. I suppose it's time for me to learn how to revert a commit? :) Jessica T. CloudStack Tech Pubs -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 1:40 PM To: Jessica Tomechak Cc: cloudstac

IRC Meeting Minutes from 17 October 2012

Hi all, Minutes from today's IRC meeting. Thanks to all who participated! === #cloudstack-meeting Meeting === Meeting started by jzb at 17:02:15 UTC. The full logs are available at: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStac

RE: Drop OVM in 4.0?

We definitely need to add these same issues in ASF Jira if it's still there. Will > -Original Message- > From: Frank Zhang [mailto:frank.zh...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:48 AM > To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org > Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > S

Re: what is the plan for the build system?

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:13 PM, David Nalley wrote: > > Personal opinion here. > I think both approaches are good, but not ideal. > Ideally in my mind - maven install (or some similar profile) would > actually deploy the software to the machine you are on. Configurable > arguments for things lik

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-370) SSVM fails to download ISO using HTTP if hostname begins with FTP

Clay B. created CLOUDSTACK-370: -- Summary: SSVM fails to download ISO using HTTP if hostname begins with FTP Key: CLOUDSTACK-370 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-370 Project: CloudSta

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-370) SSVM fails to download ISO using HTTP if hostname begins with FTP

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Clay B. updated CLOUDSTACK-370: --- Environment: Running CloudStack-oss-3.0.2-1-rhel6.2 on CentOS 6.3 > SSVM fails to download IS

Re: Drop OVM in 4.0?

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Will Chan wrote: > We definitely need to add these same issues in ASF Jira if it's still there. > > Will > >> -Original Message- >> From: Frank Zhang [mailto:frank.zh...@citrix.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:48 AM >> To: cloudstack-us...@incub

Re: Drop OVM in 4.0?

We would like to see OVM supported, including updating CloudStack to support OVM latest version. Regards, Kristoffer Sheather From: "David Nalley" Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 6:06 AM To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Drop OVM i

Re: Drop OVM in 4.0?

On Oct 17, 2012, at 12:40 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Frank Zhang wrote: >> OVM is broken in 4.0 even these patches don't have license issue. It takes a >> while to fix. >> I vote to dropping it from 4.0 > > Aside from the licensing issues - what are the issues t

RE: Drop OVM in 4.0?

I don't think anyone wants to drop the feature. The thought was, will fixing support for this HV push release back by a large amount? And if so, then could the feature fix come after 4.0 in the form of 4.0.1. And I completely agree that if this is the case, it should be documented, or the upgrade

Any reason why domain end user cannot provision VM using VPC created from its domain admin

Hi there, In playing with VPC feature, I noticed that a domain end user cannot provision a VM instance using VPC created by its domain admin? Any reason that we place such a restriction. IMO, VPC is like infrastructure setup, after that is done by domain admin, it should be visible to end user

[DISCUSS] QA/Testing focus on 4.1

Warning: This is a long ponderous email. Stop now and get your cup of coffee/tea/$beverage. Hi folks, I've been having some off hand conversations with folks in other open source communities and rereading a number of good books of late (most notably Continuous Delivery by Jez Humble) and I would

Build 733 and system VM template scripts

Hi I just deployed build 733 of ACS 4.0, and cannot run the following script: /usr/lib64/cloud/agent/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt I am told by the system that the path does not exist. I found the script in: /usr/lib64/cloud/common/scripts/storage/secondary/

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-102: Update packaging and installation sections

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7635/#review12531 --- INSTALL.md I

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-370) SSVM fails to download ISO using HTTP if hostname begins with FTP

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13478458#comment-13478458 ] edison su commented on CLOUDSTACK-370: -- It's a "bug" in apache httpclient, which

Re: Build 733 and system VM template scripts

Doc bug - See CloudStack-344 --David On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Kelcey Damage (BBITS) wrote: > Hi > > ** ** > > I just deployed build 733 of ACS 4.0, and cannot run the following script: > > > ** ** > > /usr/lib64/cloud/agent/scripts/storage/secondary/cloud-install-sys-tmplt** > *

Re: Review Request: Fix for Defect-344 (location for many of the cloud-* tools is updated)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7636/#review12544 --- This no longer cleanly applies to master. (And the scope of changes i

Re: [2/2] fix for CLOUDSTACK-344

My apologies for applying to this branch - I'll revert shortly. --David On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:32 PM, wrote: > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-cloudstack/blob/c24bc002/docs/en-US/management-server-install-systemvm.xml > ---

[jira] [Closed] (CLOUDSTACK-370) SSVM fails to download ISO using HTTP if hostname begins with FTP

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] edison su closed CLOUDSTACK-370. Resolution: Won't Fix > SSVM fails to download ISO using HTTP if hostname begins with FTP >

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-370) SSVM fails to download ISO using HTTP if hostname begins with FTP

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13478463#comment-13478463 ] David Nalley commented on CLOUDSTACK-370: - For the record that is HTTPCLIENT-7

RE: [DISCUSS] QA/Testing focus on 4.1

+1 We have covered may be 20-25% of overall coverage that should happen given the initial assessment on the available resources and timeline. Going forward, definitely need to have automation in place for unit tests and regression which would help immensely. If you can post timings on IRC, I

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-370) SSVM fails to download ISO using HTTP if hostname begins with FTP

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13478481#comment-13478481 ] Clay B. commented on CLOUDSTACK-370: This looks to be a bug in HTTPClient: (Using

  1   2   >