that's it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi [mailto:sateesh.chodapune...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 6:13 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Hari Kannan
> Cc: Musayev, Ilya
> Subject: RE: question on Distributed Virtual Switch s
, 2013 2:26 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: question on Distributed Virtual Switch support
Thanks Sailaja.
If I do not have any plans to use Nexus, I might not set the
vmware.use.nexus.dvswitch flag to true.
If I do not want Nexus, why do I need to set the Traffic Label name
It could be UI issue .
Thanks,
Sailaja.M
-Original Message-
From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:26 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: question on Distributed Virtual Switch support
Thanks Sailaja
: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 2:17 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: question on Distributed Virtual Switch support
Hi Radhika,
I guess you are talking about the options "Override Public-Traffic:" - Y/N or
"Overrid
laja.M
-Original Message-
From: Radhika Puthiyetath [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 1:56 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: question on Distributed Virtual Switch support
Thanks Sailaja.
Even If vmware.use.nexus.vswitch=false (
reason I confused initially!)
-Original Message-
From: Sailaja Mada [mailto:sailaja.m...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 1:25 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: question on Distributed Virtual Switch support
Hi Radhika,
You need to set global config
ent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 12:19 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: question on Distributed Virtual Switch support
Hello,
One question about the Nexus virtual switch configuration. What is the impact
of the change in the configuration flow (after introducing VMware VDS)
-Original Message-
From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:05 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; fgaudrea...@cloudops.com
Subject: RE: question on Distributed Virtual Switch support
Francois,
Good observation, I was only referencing 1GB networks
oudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: question on Distributed Virtual Switch support
>
> On 2013-03-08 10:26 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
> > There maybe customers who only have 2NICs on their servers and it that
> case - if they use DVS, they wont be able to use CS. Also, for most proof o
On 2013-03-08 10:26 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote:
There maybe customers who only have 2NICs on their servers and it that case -
if they use DVS, they wont be able to use CS. Also, for most proof of concept
work of CS, people tend to use basic gear with 2 NICs in LAB, they won't be
able to test CS i
> From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net]
> Sent: 09 March 2013 08:56
> To: Hari Kannan; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Sateesh Chodapuneedi; Koushik Das; Anantha Kasetty
> Subject: RE: question on Distributed Virtual Switch support
>
> Hari
>
>
discussed - support for PVLAN -
so, PVLAN support via DVS is a must-have requirement..
Hari
-Original Message-
From: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2013 10:42 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Hari Kannan
Subject: RE: question on Distributed Virtual Switch suppor
ack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Sateesh Chodapuneedi; Koushik Das; Anantha Kasetty
Subject: RE: question on Distributed Virtual Switch support
Hari
I gave a second thought to your request about having a support for management
network and DVS.
Here are the use cases,
Be default the hypervisors are dep
@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Sateesh Chodapuneedi; Koushik Das; Anantha Kasetty
Subject: RE: question on Distributed Virtual Switch support
Hari
I gave a second thought to your request about having a support for management
network and DVS.
Here are the use cases,
Be default the hypervisors are deployed with
rs [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 2:25 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Sateesh Chodapuneedi; Koushik Das; Anantha Kasetty
> Subject: Re: question on Distributed Virtual Switch support
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Hari Kanna
y
> Subject: Re: question on Distributed Virtual Switch support
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Hari Kannan wrote:
> > Hi Sateesh,
> >
> > As we increase the cluster size, I wonder not having the management
> network on DVS might be an issue. I would strongly suggest w
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Hari Kannan wrote:
> Hi Sateesh,
>
> As we increase the cluster size, I wonder not having the management network
> on DVS might be an issue. I would strongly suggest we consider this. I also
> spoke to some folks who are more knowledgeable with customer implementa
: question on Distributed Virtual Switch support
Hi Hari,
Please see my comments inline.
> From: Hari Kannan
> Sent: 08 March 2013 11:34
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Koushik Das; Sateesh
> Chodapuneedi
> Subject: question on Distributed Virtual Switch support
>
>
Hi Hari,
Please see my comments inline.
> From: Hari Kannan
> Sent: 08 March 2013 11:34
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Koushik Das; Sateesh Chodapuneedi
> Subject: question on Distributed Virtual Switch support
>
> Hi Sateesh
>
> After going through the FS
Hi Sateesh
After going through the FS, I have a few questions:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Integration+of+CloudStack+with+VMware+DVS
Comment "Management network over virtual switches other than standard vSwitch.
Does CloudStack has to support management/private networ
20 matches
Mail list logo
