ustus, 2012 18:31
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: port-range support in createPortForwardingRule API method
On 8/16/12 5:49 AM, "Mukesh Kumar" wrote:
>>Dear All,
>>We are trying to setup Cloudstack 3.0.2 with advance network.
>>
>>One of o
bausew...@tier3.com]
Sent: donderdag, 16 augustus, 2012 18:23
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: port-range support in createPortForwardingRule API method
Hi Mukesh,
You could enable a static NAT which would forward all traffic from a public IP
to a private IP.
On 8/16/12 5:49 AM, "Mukesh Kumar" wrote:
>Dear All,
>We are trying to setup Cloudstack 3.0.2 with advance network.
>
>One of our business case, is to forward all the traffic (TCP/UDP), for a
>IP that belongs to a network, to an instance within the same network.
>
>Using createPortForwardingRule
, 2012 5:49 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: port-range support in createPortForwardingRule API method
Dear All,
We are trying to setup Cloudstack 3.0.2 with advance network.
One of our business case, is to forward all the traffic (TCP/UDP), for a IP
that belongs to a network, to
Dear All,
We are trying to setup Cloudstack 3.0.2 with advance network.
One of our business case, is to forward all the traffic (TCP/UDP), for a IP
that belongs to a network, to an instance within the same network.
Using createPortForwardingRule API method seems good solution, but we're not
sur
