Re: deb package name and the split in subpackages

2013-01-14 Thread Rohit Yadav
On 13-Jan-2013, at 10:30 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi, > > On 01/11/2013 04:05 PM, Noa Resare wrote: >> (This email is probably mostly for Wido and possibly Hugo but I'm sending >> it to the list to get a bit more transparency) >> > > Great! :) > >> Looking at the packaging branch(1) I

Re: deb package name and the split in subpackages

2013-01-13 Thread Wido den Hollander
Hi, On 01/11/2013 04:05 PM, Noa Resare wrote: (This email is probably mostly for Wido and possibly Hugo but I'm sending it to the list to get a bit more transparency) Great! :) Looking at the packaging branch(1) I think the work to reduce the number of subpackages is a very good initiative.

RE: deb package name and the split in subpackages

2013-01-11 Thread Rohit Yadav
...@spotify.com] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 8:35 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: deb package name and the split in subpackages (This email is probably mostly for Wido and possibly Hugo but I'm sending it to the list to get a bit more transparency) Looking at the packaging b

Re: deb package name and the split in subpackages

2013-01-11 Thread David Nalley
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Noa Resare wrote: > (This email is probably mostly for Wido and possibly Hugo but I'm sending > it to the list to get a bit more transparency) > > Looking at the packaging branch(1) I think the work to reduce the number of > subpackages is a very good initiative.

deb package name and the split in subpackages

2013-01-11 Thread Noa Resare
(This email is probably mostly for Wido and possibly Hugo but I'm sending it to the list to get a bit more transparency) Looking at the packaging branch(1) I think the work to reduce the number of subpackages is a very good initiative. The current setup for 4.0 with lots of packages with somewhat