On 13-Jan-2013, at 10:30 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/11/2013 04:05 PM, Noa Resare wrote:
>> (This email is probably mostly for Wido and possibly Hugo but I'm sending
>> it to the list to get a bit more transparency)
>>
>
> Great! :)
>
>> Looking at the packaging branch(1) I
Hi,
On 01/11/2013 04:05 PM, Noa Resare wrote:
(This email is probably mostly for Wido and possibly Hugo but I'm sending
it to the list to get a bit more transparency)
Great! :)
Looking at the packaging branch(1) I think the work to reduce the number of
subpackages is a very good initiative.
...@spotify.com]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 8:35 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: deb package name and the split in subpackages
(This email is probably mostly for Wido and possibly Hugo but I'm sending
it to the list to get a bit more transparency)
Looking at the packaging b
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Noa Resare wrote:
> (This email is probably mostly for Wido and possibly Hugo but I'm sending
> it to the list to get a bit more transparency)
>
> Looking at the packaging branch(1) I think the work to reduce the number of
> subpackages is a very good initiative.
(This email is probably mostly for Wido and possibly Hugo but I'm sending
it to the list to get a bit more transparency)
Looking at the packaging branch(1) I think the work to reduce the number of
subpackages is a very good initiative. The current setup for 4.0 with lots
of packages with somewhat