Re: basic zone security groups

2013-03-13 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Yes, that's exactly what I did. ebtables -F on the instance's inbound chain. It was the 'DefaultSharedNetworkOffering'. I assumed there were at least ebtables rules to keep the VM from using IP addresses it didn't own, but this was like I had security groups turned on, without the ability to edit t

Re: basic zone security groups

2013-03-13 Thread Ahmad Emneina
If ebtables -F restores vm service(s)... it sounds like a bug. On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Quick question, I deployed a basic zone today on 4.1 for testing, and > I chose the default network provider WITHOUT security groups. The > result was that all of the instance

basic zone security groups

2013-03-13 Thread Marcus Sorensen
Quick question, I deployed a basic zone today on 4.1 for testing, and I chose the default network provider WITHOUT security groups. The result was that all of the instances deployed could not host services. They could get out, but nothing could reach their IPs. I ran an 'ebtables -t nat -L' and saw