nesday, October 17, 2012 10:56 PM
>> To: Jayapal Reddy Uradi; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alena
>> Prokharchyk
>> Subject: RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the
>> SRX
>>
>> Hi Jayapal,
>>
>> In SRX , we do not support fi
k
> Subject: RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the
> SRX
>
> Hi Jayapal,
>
> In SRX , we do not support firewall except in cases where we have to open
> the ports for Static NAT.
>
> This being the case , On any acquired Ip address which does NOT h
reporting back the error to the user.
-Thanks
Sangeetha
-Original Message-
From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 11:13 PM
To: Sangeetha Hariharan; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the SRX
Hi
; From: Sangeetha Hariharan
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:47 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alena Prokharchyk
> Subject: RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the
> SRX
>
> Hi Jayapal,
>
> Had the following questions after reviewing
sage-
> From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 7:43 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alena Prokharchyk
> Subject: RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the
> SRX
>
> Updated the FS as
used in the create firewall is different
>>>from that provided in the PF rule) ?
>
>Thanks
>Sangeetha
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Sangeetha Hariharan
>Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:47 PM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alena Prokharchyk
>Subject:
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:47 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alena Prokharchyk
Subject: RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the SRX
Hi Jayapal,
Had the following questions after reviewing the FS.
1) "Case 4:
Firewall rule is not deleted when disable t
7:43 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alena Prokharchyk
Subject: RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the SRX
Updated the FS as per the discussion.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Static+NAT,+Port+Forwarding+and+Firewall+Implementation+on+SRX
Thank
, October 16, 2012 12:44 PM
> To: Alena Prokharchyk; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the
> SRX
>
> Please see my comments inline.
>
> -Jayapal
>
> From: Alena Prokharchyk
> Sent: Monday, Octobe
Please see my comments inline.
-Jayapal
From: Alena Prokharchyk
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2012 10:04 PM
To: Jayapal Reddy Uradi; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the SRX
From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi
mailto:jayapalreddy.ur
ack-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the
SRX
Jayapal, please see my comments inline.
-Alena.
On 10/11/12 11:07 PM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi"
mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com>> wrote:
>Alena,
>
>Please
Hi Alena,
Please see my comments inline,
-Jayapal
> -Original Message-
> From: Alena Prokharchyk
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 10:19 PM
> To: Jayapal Reddy Uradi; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenati
gt;-Original Message-
>>From: Alena Prokharchyk
>>Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 5:54 AM
>>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Jayapal Reddy Uradi
>>Subject: Re: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the
>>SRX
>>
>>Jayapal, I rev
Friday, October 12, 2012 5:54 AM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Jayapal Reddy Uradi
>Subject: Re: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the
>SRX
>
>Jayapal, I reviewed the spec. My comments:
>
>If firewall rules per public IP address can't be
Alena,
Please find my inline comments.
Thanks,
Jayapal
Thanks,
Jayapal
-Original Message-
From: Alena Prokharchyk
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 5:54 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Jayapal Reddy Uradi
Subject: Re: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on
Jayapal, I reviewed the spec. My comments:
If firewall rules per public IP address can't be configured on the SRX,
and there is no way to fix it (your spec says so in "Limitation" section),
why do we introduce all this complexity? To me it seems like we are trying
to show the user that he is contr
StaticNAT, PortForwarding and Firewall current functionality in SRX is not
similar to the Virtual router.
This functional spec describes the what configuration possible on the SRX and
also the limitation of SRX compared to the functionality in VR.
Please find the functional spec here:
17 matches
Mail list logo
