On 3/11/13 10:01 AM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:52 PM, George Reese
> wrote:
>> From listZones ->
>>
>> >cloud-stack-version="3.0.5.20120904142539">1f9a1
>>d2eb-c49e-4b87-ac9b-9c47e2d912a3australia-canberra-2>tworktype>Advancedfalse>upsenabled>Enabled257b387d-
>>3d9d-3585-8
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:52 PM, George Reese
wrote:
> From listZones ->
>
> cloud-stack-version="3.0.5.20120904142539">1f9a1d2eb-c49e-4b87-ac9b-9c47e2d912a3australia-canberra-2AdvancedfalseEnabled257b387d-3d9d-3585-8c65-cc26d38a3a97VirtualRouterfalse
>
> And then I create a Security Group ->
>
From listZones ->
1f9a1d2eb-c49e-4b87-ac9b-9c47e2d912a3australia-canberra-2AdvancedfalseEnabled257b387d-3d9d-3585-8c65-cc26d38a3a97VirtualRouterfalse
And then I create a Security Group ->
GET
http://cloudplatform.cloudcentral.com.au/client/api/api?command=createSecurityGroup&name=dsnfw5821&desc
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:28 PM, George Reese
wrote:
> I see environments with securitygroupsenabled = false but security groups
> work. There must be more to it than that flag.
>
> -George
>
You see that using securitygroupsenabled = false with listZones and SG work?
Alena: Thoughts?
--David
I see environments with securitygroupsenabled = false but security groups work.
There must be more to it than that flag.
-George
On Mar 11, 2013, at 11:08 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:52 AM, George Reese
> wrote:
>> Is there a reliable way to determine across versions
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:52 AM, George Reese
wrote:
> Is there a reliable way to determine across versions of CloudStack whether or
> not a specific implementation supports the provisioning of security groups?
>
> Thanks,
> -George
>
listZones should tell you
(listCapabilities as well)
See
Is there a reliable way to determine across versions of CloudStack whether or
not a specific implementation supports the provisioning of security groups?
Thanks,
-George
--
George Reese - Chief Technology Officer, Enstratius
e: george.re...@enstratius.comSkype: nspollutiont: @GeorgeReese
only sg networks (i.e. not show non-sg
networks).
> UI of "Security Group support in Advance zone" feature
> --
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-537
> URL: https://issues.apache.o
ount-specific network doesn't work at
backend. Therefore, remove "account" option from scope dropdown. (2) zone-wide
network: list only sg network offerings.
> UI of "Security Group suppo
late only sg networks (i.e. not show non-sg
networks).
> UI of "Security Group support in Advance zone" feature
> --
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-537
> URL: https://issues.apache.o
ount-specific network doesn't work at
backend. Therefore, remove "account" option from scope dropdown. (2) zone-wide
network: list only sg network offerings.
> UI of "Security Group suppo
wizard is not supported in this type of setup.
> UI of "Security Group support in Advance zone" feature
> --
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-537
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-537:
-
Issue Type: Improvement (was: New Feature)
> UI of "Security Group su
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-537:
-
Description:
UI of "Security Group support in Advance zone" featur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sudha Ponnaganti updated CLOUDSTACK-537:
Fix Version/s: 4.1.0
> UI of "Security Group support in Adva
ed in branches: master
Contained in no tag
> UI of "Security Group support in Advance zone" feature
> --
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-537
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jessica Wang resolved CLOUDSTACK-537.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> UI of "Security Group support in Advance zone&
zone.
Contained in branches: master
Contained in no tag
> UI of "Security Group support in Advance zone" feature
> --
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-537
> URL: https://issues.apache.o
cned
SG-disabled zones. (2) create network dialog - zone dropdown - populate only
Advacned SG-disabled zones.
Contained in branches: master
Contained in no tag
> UI of "Security Group support in Advance z
work dailog -
scope dropdown - list only Accounts option if it's for an Advanced SG-enabled
zone.
Contained in branches: master
Contained in no tag
> UI of "Security Group support in Advance zone" feature
> -
ELB
service.
Contained in branches: master
Contained in no tag
> UI of "Security Group support in Advance zone" feature
> --
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-537
> URL: https://issues.apac
lude
SecurityGroup service.
Contained in branches: master
Contained in no tag
> UI of "Security Group support in Advance zone" feature
> --
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-537
> URL: https://
hit,
Programmatically find a Shared network with Security Group in the selected
zone, then pass it to deployVirtualMachine API.
Contained in branches: master
Contained in no tag
> UI of "Security Group support in Advance z
ined in branches: master
Contained in no tag
> UI of "Security Group support in Advance zone" feature
> --
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-537
> URL: https://issues.apache.o
tag
> UI of "Security Group support in Advance zone" feature
> --
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-537
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-537
> Project:
d in no tag
> UI of "Security Group support in Advance zone" feature
> --
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-537
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-537
>
zone:
enable VirtualRouter and VpcVirtualRouter provider.
Contained in branches: master
Contained in no tag
> UI of "Security Group support in Advance zone" feature
> --
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK
#x27;s an
Advanced zone with SG. Do not pass them to CreateNetwork API if it's a Basic
zone.
Contained in branches: master
Contained in no tag
> UI of "Security Group support in Advance zone" feature
>
step with 5 fields (gateway, netmask, startIp, endIp, VLAN
ID) and pass them to CreateNetwork API when creating default guest network.
Contained in branches: master
Contained in no tag
> UI of "Security Group support in Advance z
Jessica Wang created CLOUDSTACK-537:
---
Summary: UI of "Security Group support in Advance zone" feature
Key: CLOUDSTACK-537
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-537
> Just to reduce the QA efforts, no other reason. The customers we have to
> upgrade, use KVM. So in this release we've decided to support it for KVM
> only.
Who is the we that has decided this? Link to the mailing list thread?
On 11/16/12 3:03 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam"
wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:17:11AM +0530, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
>> In 2.2.x version of the cloudStack we provided support for Security
>>Groups
>> in Advance zone. The feature was temporary disabled in released versions
>> of 3.0.x branch due t
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:17:11AM +0530, Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
> In 2.2.x version of the cloudStack we provided support for Security Groups
> in Advance zone. The feature was temporary disabled in released versions
> of 3.0.x branch due to lack of dev and test resources needed to
> accommodate
Hi Murali,
Please see the answers inline.
-Alena.
On 11/14/12 10:54 PM, "Murali Reddy" wrote:
>Alena,
>
>I have couple of queries on the requirements listed in the spec.
>
>- "Shared Zone Wide SG Enabled Guest network is required in Advance SG
>enabled zone as CPVM/SSVM are using it."
>
>I a
Alena,
I have couple of queries on the requirements listed in the spec.
- "Shared Zone Wide SG Enabled Guest network is required in Advance SG
enabled zone as CPVM/SSVM are using it."
I am not clear why CPVM/SSVM will use the shared guest network with SG.
- "No Isolated networks can be added
In 2.2.x version of the cloudStack we provided support for Security Groups
in Advance zone. The feature was temporary disabled in released versions
of 3.0.x branch due to lack of dev and test resources needed to
accommodate the feature to the new NaaS framework.
Disabling the feature made an upgr
36 matches
Mail list logo
