r.apache.org
> Subject: Re: re-implement clvm
>
> I'm at home, don't have access to the copy I cloned yesterday, but
> wouldn't this have been in there being that the date is May 24? Or was
> it committed in a branch that was merged (sorry, not super versed in
> gi
iso to
> hypervisor host, then stop/start ssvm.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 3:57 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: re-implement clvm
&
, 2012 3:57 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: re-implement clvm
>
> hacked a fix by editing /var/cache/cloud/cmdline in the ssvm to use
> NfsSecondaryStorageResource. Now I hit
> "http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15143";, x != java.lang.Str
; using equivalent dmsetup commands. At
>> that point we had something that looked the same as the original
>> patch, with only minor changes in syntax and variable names.
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Edison Su wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
h, with only minor changes in syntax and variable names.
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Edison Su wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 3:09 PM
>>
02, 2012 3:09 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: re-implement clvm
>>
>> Oh, I understand, but most of the relevant code is implemented in
>> 'if/else
>> if/else' blocks, such that its simply a matter of copying the existing
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2012 3:09 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: re-implement clvm
>
> Oh, I understand, but most of the relevant code is implemented in
> code, that's just what it is.
>
> I'm not a lawyer so please don't take this as legal advice from Citrix or
> me.
>
> -kevin
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday,
or.apache.org
> Subject: Re: re-implement clvm
>
> Here's the refactored patch. The CLVM stuff is basically a copy of the RBD
> additions; and the patch also includes the original changes to
> managesnapshot.sh, which is unmodified.
>
> I'm personally more concer
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Here's the refactored patch. The CLVM stuff is basically a copy of the
> RBD additions; and the patch also includes the original changes to
> managesnapshot.sh, which is unmodified.
>
> I'm personally more concerned about the core functiona
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> sure, just let me know how to send it in.
Go to reviews.apache.org
Create an account
Submit the patch - add the 'group' cloudstack
You should see it appear on the mailing list shortly thereafter.
--David
y 31, 2012 3:09 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: re-implement clvm
>>
>> Here's the refactored patch. The CLVM stuff is basically a copy of the
>> RBD additions; and the patch also includes the original changes to
>> managesnap
Could you send the patch to reviewboard, and remove the snapshot part?
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 3:09 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: re-implement clvm
>
>
ent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 1:33 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: re-implement clvm
>>
>> Ok, so I've created a refactored patch that seems to work. It was
>> pretty much entirely the RBD additions that were blocking the original
>> from being
ubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: re-implement clvm
>
> Ok, so I've created a refactored patch that seems to work. It was
> pretty much entirely the RBD additions that were blocking the original
> from being rolled back in. If a developer would be willing to take on
> the whole
Ok, so I've created a refactored patch that seems to work. It was
pretty much entirely the RBD additions that were blocking the original
from being rolled back in. If a developer would be willing to take on
the whole license issue and see this functionality put back in I'd
still be willing to pay h
On 07/31/2012 10:12 PM, David Nalley wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 07/31/2012 09:48 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
I'd be happy to try more if I had access to any contact info. As it
is, things in the surrounding code have changed enough that a bit of
r
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 07/31/2012 09:48 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> I'd be happy to try more if I had access to any contact info. As it
>> is, things in the surrounding code have changed enough that a bit of
>> re-factoring would need to be done e
That's my problem too. I'm about 75% of the way through hacking my own
patch together, and it looks at least superficially like most of the
RBD code was based on the CLVM stuff (extra if statements added and
CLVM replaced with RBD). I'm comfortable with reusing this in my
environment, but getting i
On 07/31/2012 09:48 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
I'd be happy to try more if I had access to any contact info. As it
is, things in the surrounding code have changed enough that a bit of
re-factoring would need to be done even if there were permission.
My hunch is that unless he's switched roles
I'd be happy to try more if I had access to any contact info. As it
is, things in the surrounding code have changed enough that a bit of
re-factoring would need to be done even if there were permission.
My hunch is that unless he's switched roles, once the new version is
released he may come out
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Simon Weller wrote:
> I recall David Nalley collecting a Cloudstack/cloud.com ICLA from rommer for
> this contribution in Q4 of last year.
>
>
> David,
>
>
> Does the ICLA contain any contact information not available on the old
> cloudstack-devel list?
>
>
> - S
I recall David Nalley collecting a Cloudstack/cloud.com ICLA from rommer for
this contribution in Q4 of last year.
David,
Does the ICLA contain any contact information not available on the old
cloudstack-devel list?
- Si
- Original Message -
From: "Marcus Sorensen"
To: cloud
23 matches
Mail list logo
