Re: devcloud2 issue ...again

2013-03-04 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
On Mar 4, 2013, at 12:44 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: >> To close this thread: >> >> I fixed this with help from Chiradeep at ApacheCon. >> >> Basically the 4.0.1 branch does not have the devcloud.sql statements that >> are now in tools/d

Re: devcloud2 issue ...again

2013-03-03 Thread Rohit Yadav
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > To close this thread: > > I fixed this with help from Chiradeep at ApacheCon. > > Basically the 4.0.1 branch does not have the devcloud.sql statements that are > now in tools/devcloud, that led to wrong entries for systemvm offerings in

Re: devcloud2 issue ...again

2013-03-03 Thread Nguyen Anh Tu
I have the same problem. Thank you so much ! 2013/3/3 Sebastien Goasguen > To close this thread: > > I fixed this with help from Chiradeep at ApacheCon. > > Basically the 4.0.1 branch does not have the devcloud.sql statements that > are now in tools/devcloud, that led to wrong entries for system

Re: devcloud2 issue ...again

2013-03-03 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
To close this thread: I fixed this with help from Chiradeep at ApacheCon. Basically the 4.0.1 branch does not have the devcloud.sql statements that are now in tools/devcloud, that led to wrong entries for systemvm offerings in the database. Once some of the updates in devcloud.sql were applie

Re: devcloud2 issue ...again

2013-02-26 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
On Feb 27, 2013, at 12:45 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > Isn't this CLOUDSTACK-587 ? > Do you need the cpvm? You could set consoleproxy.capacity.standby to 0 It looks like it, but I don't understand why I am running into this now. I just tried with 4.0.0 and I get the same UnsufficientServerCa

Re: devcloud2 issue ...again

2013-02-26 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi Sebastien, looks like a 4.0.1 issue. I don't what got changed around cpvm, will take a look at it next week if it still won't get resolved. Regards. On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Very strange. > > I set systemvm.use.local.storage to true and the ssvm started, b

Re: devcloud2 issue ...again

2013-02-26 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
Isn't this CLOUDSTACK-587 ? Do you need the cpvm? You could set consoleproxy.capacity.standby to 0 On 2/26/13 9:33 PM, "Sebastien Goasguen" wrote: >Very strange. > >I set systemvm.use.local.storage to true and the ssvm started, but the >cpvm did not and I get a new type of error now: > > [ja

Re: devcloud2 issue ...again

2013-02-26 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
Very strange. I set systemvm.use.local.storage to true and the ssvm started, but the cpvm did not and I get a new type of error now: [java] INFO [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:) No stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new secondary

Re: devcloud2 issue

2013-01-16 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
I started fresh, importing the devcloud2. Setup the datacenter and I get: INFO [cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl] (1561421084@qtp-683222062-2:) Trying to add a new host at http://192.168.56.10/ in data center 1 INFO [xen.discoverer.XcpServerDiscoverer] (1561421084@qtp-683222062-2:) Found hos

Re: devcloud2 issue

2013-01-15 Thread Isaac Chiang
Hi Sebastien: Did you see any warning message, such as "Detecting a new state but couldn't find a old state so adding it to the changes: r-4-VM", in debug mode? I just want to make sure the issue happens in recent commits. If so, there is a workaround which is to restart the MS and each