Re: Wiki Content Licensing

2013-03-15 Thread Sebastien Goasguen
On Mar 14, 2013, at 2:34 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Mark Hinkle wrote: >> On 3/14/13 1:27 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: >> >> >>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Mark Hinkle >>> wrote: I bring this up because as I look at the wiki there is no copyright

Re: Wiki Content Licensing

2013-03-14 Thread David Nalley
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Mark Hinkle wrote: > On 3/14/13 1:27 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: > > >>On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Mark Hinkle >>wrote: >>> I bring this up because as I look at the wiki there is no copyright >>>notice nor does a search bring up a link to a copyright notice on

Re: Wiki Content Licensing

2013-03-14 Thread Mark Hinkle
On 3/14/13 1:27 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: >On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Mark Hinkle >wrote: >> I bring this up because as I look at the wiki there is no copyright >>notice nor does a search bring up a link to a copyright notice on the >>wiki. Is the wiki content licensed under the Apache Li

Re: Wiki Content Licensing

2013-03-14 Thread David Nalley
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Mark Hinkle wrote: > I bring this up because as I look at the wiki there is no copyright notice > nor does a search bring up a link to a copyright notice on the wiki. Is the > wiki content licensed under the Apache License 2.0 like the manuals or does > it fall