Re: Help with packaging and doc for sysadmins

2013-02-26 Thread Murali Reddy
Hugo, In the current model, components that are not needed by default are not present in componentContext.xml. Just in case if you have not noticed, in 4.1, NiciraNvp bean is not enabled by default :). Admin needs to edit componentContext.xml, to enable a optional component. Thanks! On 26/02/13

Re: Help with packaging and doc for sysadmins

2013-02-26 Thread Rohit Yadav
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Heya Rohit, > > Why would a sysadmin need to change this? They should be considered part of > the source code, any configuration should be done via the config in the > database or with the *.properties files. But either way I'm fine, we c

Re: Help with packaging and doc for sysadmins

2013-02-26 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hey Hugo! On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Hugo Trippaers wrote: > Heya Rohit, > > Why would a sysadmin need to change this? They should be considered part of > the source code, any configuration should be done via the config in the > database or with the *.properties files. I thought we wante

Re: Help with packaging and doc for sysadmins

2013-02-26 Thread Dave Cahill
Hi, For what it's worth, I was under the same impression as Rohit - that administrators would edit components.xml to fit their deployment. See for example this snippet from "Extending CloudStack Networking" [1]: > "Generally, it is expected that the cloud administrator will configure components.

RE: Help with packaging and doc for sysadmins

2013-02-26 Thread Hugo Trippaers
Heya Rohit, Why would a sysadmin need to change this? They should be considered part of the source code, any configuration should be done via the config in the database or with the *.properties files. Cheers, Hugo > -Original Message- > From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada..