On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
>
>>>
>>> 4. Since both SRX and F5 are being programmed when creating a LB rule ,
>>>if either one of them is down/unreachable , we should expect the LB rule
>>>creation to error out . In such cases , will we be providing an error
>>>messag
>>
>> 4. Since both SRX and F5 are being programmed when creating a LB rule ,
>>if either one of them is down/unreachable , we should expect the LB rule
>>creation to error out . In such cases , will we be providing an error
>>message to the user and he should be able to recreate the same LB rules
LB are reachable?
I suppose user would retry it later... Or complain to admin who would
know that one device is down.
--Sheng
>
>
> -Thanks
> Sangeetha
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 11:04 AM
October 11, 2012 11:04 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Sheng Yang
Subject: Re: F5 & SRX in in-line mode PRD review
Hi Sanjeev,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Sanjeev Neelarapu
wrote:
> Hi Sheng,
>
> Following are the review comments on F5&SRX in in-line mode PR
Hi Sanjeev,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Sanjeev Neelarapu
wrote:
> Hi Sheng,
>
> Following are the review comments on F5&SRX in in-line mode PRD:
>
>
> 1. Apart from providing security to load balancing traffic are there any
> other benefits of deploying F5&SRX in in-line mode?
No as
