lis.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 10:31 PM
To: 'Marcus Sorensen'; Wido den Hollander
Cc: Chip Childers; David Nalley; Alex Huang; Pradeep Soundararajan;
cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
Hey Marcus,
I haven't updated package.sh
r=`mktemp -d`
>>>> mkdir -p "$tempdir"
>>>> cp dist/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/*.rpm $tempdir/
>>>> createrepo $tempdir/
>>>>
>>>> The above is working well for me.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Pradeep S
;> Pradeep S
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-
>>> From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 10:31 PM
>>> To: 'Marcus Sorensen'; Wido den Hollander
>>> Cc: Chi
Pradeep S
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 10:31 PM
>> To: 'Marcus Sorensen'; Wido den Hollander
>> Cc: Chip Childers; David Nalley; Alex Huang; P
;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 10:31 PM
> To: 'Marcus Sorensen'; Wido den Hollander
> Cc: Chip Childers; David Nalley; Alex Huang; Pradeep Soundararajan;
> cloudstack-de
loud.spec
Cheers,
Hugo
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 3:08 PM
> To: Wido den Hollander
> Cc: Hugo Trippaers; Chip Childers; David Nalley; Alex Huang; Pradeep
> Soundararajan; cloudstack-de
,
Hugo
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 3:08 PM
> To: Wido den Hollander
> Cc: Hugo Trippaers; Chip Childers; David Nalley; Alex Huang; Pradeep
> Soundararajan; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.o
ure the RPM and DEB packages contain the same files.
>>
>> Then it will just be tuning and some work in the pre and postinst files, but
>> that could be a pain, but we'll just see when we go along.
>>
>> Wido
>>
>>
>>> Cheers,
>
; Then it will just be tuning and some work in the pre and postinst files, but
> that could be a pain, but we'll just see when we go along.
>
> Wido
>
>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Hugo
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Chip Childers [mai
t: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:31:14PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Alex Huang
wrote:
Well, first, Apache CloudStack only releases source code.
But Wido is kind enough to also host RPM / DEB package repos for
users to take advantage of. Ou
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:32:02PM -0500, Hugo Trippaers wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Just a quick note before the weekend with a status update on RPM.
>
> The management server package is pretty much done and installation
> on a clean system works like a charm. This is actually tested every
> few hour
Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 2:39 AM
> To: David Nalley
> Cc: Alex Huang; Pradeep Soundararajan; Wido den Hollander; cloudstack-
> d...@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:31:14PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> >> Well, first, Apache CloudStack only releases source code.
> >>
> >> But Wido is kind enough to also ho
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:31:14PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> >> Well, first, Apache CloudStack only releases source code.
> >>
> >> But Wido is kind enough to also host RPM / DEB package repos for users
> >> to take advantage of. Our install
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>> Well, first, Apache CloudStack only releases source code.
>>
>> But Wido is kind enough to also host RPM / DEB package repos for users
>> to take advantage of. Our install guide explains how to build from
>> source, as well as how to use Wido's
On Wednesday, February 6, 2013, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 03:30:04PM +0530, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote:
> > Thanks Hugo, Wido and Noa for bringing this to some closure :)
> >
> > I am able to package rpm using "packaging/centos63/package.sh" after
> some modification in the p
> Well, first, Apache CloudStack only releases source code.
>
> But Wido is kind enough to also host RPM / DEB package repos for users
> to take advantage of. Our install guide explains how to build from
> source, as well as how to use Wido's repos.
>
> This was all true for 4.0.0-incubating, an
On Wednesday, February 6, 2013, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote:
> Thanks Hugo, Wido and Noa for bringing this to some closure :)
>
> I am able to package rpm using "packaging/centos63/package.sh" after some
> modification in the package.sh script since cloud.spec is looking for
> 'cloudstack' Name.
>
nesday, February 06, 2013 8:51 AM
To: Pradeep Soundararajan
Cc: Wido den Hollander; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 10:05:00PM +0530, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote:
> Wido, how are we planning to setup the install for this new packaging
Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 10:02 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
>
>
>
> On 02/06/2013 04:57 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 03:30:04PM +0530, Pra
Wido, how are we planning to setup the install for this new packaging concept?
Thanks,
Pradeep S
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 10:02 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in
On 02/06/2013 04:57 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 03:30:04PM +0530, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote:
Thanks Hugo, Wido and Noa for bringing this to some closure :)
I am able to package rpm using "packaging/centos63/package.sh" after some
modification in the package.sh script s
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 03:30:04PM +0530, Pradeep Soundararajan wrote:
> Thanks Hugo, Wido and Noa for bringing this to some closure :)
>
> I am able to package rpm using "packaging/centos63/package.sh" after some
> modification in the package.sh script since cloud.spec is looking for
> 'cloudst
lto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 1:33 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On 02/05/2013 06:33 PM, Noa Resare wrote:
I built the latest from the packaging branch. I think it is shaping up
nicely. Some thoughts:
How would you feel w
t; From: Pradeep Soundararajan [mailto:pradeep.soundarara...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 11:00 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
> Importance: High
>
> Thanks Hugo, Wido and Noa for bringing this to some closur
06, 2013 1:33 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On 02/05/2013 06:33 PM, Noa Resare wrote:
> I built the latest from the packaging branch. I think it is shaping up
> nicely. Some thoughts:
>
> How would you feel with postponing the co
tyada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com**] On Behalf
Of Rohit Yadav
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 5:14 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.**apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:41 AM, David Nalley wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Rohit Yadav
...@gmail.com**] On Behalf
>> Of Rohit Yadav
>> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 5:14 PM
>> To:
>> cloudstack-dev@incubator.**apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:41 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun,
Did bigtop infra provide a large choice of Linux distros ?
Better build packages for distro X under distro X.
2013/2/5 Andrew Bayer :
> I should probably pipe up with my suggestion of getting CloudStack into
> Apache Bigtop here. =) http://bigtop.apache.org/ - it's mainly focused on
> the Hadoop e
I should probably pipe up with my suggestion of getting CloudStack into
Apache Bigtop here. =) http://bigtop.apache.org/ - it's mainly focused on
the Hadoop ecosystem currently, but at the very least it'd provide an
infrastructure, some consistent guidelines on builds/layout/etc.
A.
On Mon, Feb 4
Well, some distributions are very stricts with binary contents in
packages, ie Debian, but not all.
BTW, there is no need to have RPM or DEB in distributions, as they
could be provided by Cloudstack as companion/extras packages
(yum/zypper, ppa).
For RPM distros, openSUSE Build System (https://bu
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> Nice to see native packages for Cloudstack :
>
> https://github.com/noaresare/incubator-cloudstack/tree/master/packaging
>
> CentOS 6.3 and Debian.
>
>
> Did there is plan to add Fedora, openSUSE, SLES or will it be done by
> these distributions
s should indeed go into common.
>>
>> Wido
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Hugo
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
>>>> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 2:48 PM
>>&g
common.
Wido
Cheers,
Hugo
-Original Message-
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 2:48 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On 02/04/2013 02:39 PM, Noa Resare wrote:
I'm on the last leg of
From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 2:48 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On 02/04/2013 02:39 PM, Noa Resare wrote:
I'm on the last leg of my trip home from FOSDEM right now, I hope to
be able to p
ls in management
and agent to I thought to put those in common.
Cheers,
Hugo
> -Original Message-
> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 2:48 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
&
03, 2013 5:14 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.**apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:41 AM, David Nalley wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:07 PM, David Nalley wrote:
...
So EL6 has pygments 1.1.1 - y
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com**] On Behalf
>> Of Rohit Yadav
>> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 5:14 PM
>> To:
>> cloudstack-dev@incubator.**apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in
[mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rohit
Yadav
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 5:14 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:41 AM, David Nalley wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3
il we have this done and integrated in the 4.1
branch.
Cheers,
Hugo
> -Original Message-
> From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 7:13 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Packaging in
place till you are done with the new changes
Thanks
/sudha
-Original Message-
From: rohityada...@gmail.com [mailto:rohityada...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rohit
Yadav
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2013 5:14 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
On
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 4:41 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:07 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>> ...
>>>
>>> So EL6 has pygments 1.1.1 - you require 1.5, so in some ways it's
>>> worth than clint (clint is in EPEL, but no new vers
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:07 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> ...
>>
>> So EL6 has pygments 1.1.1 - you require 1.5, so in some ways it's
>> worth than clint (clint is in EPEL, but no new version of pygments in
>> EPEL/CentOS-Extras/CentOS-Plus)
>
> I
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:07 PM, David Nalley wrote:
...
>
> So EL6 has pygments 1.1.1 - you require 1.5, so in some ways it's
> worth than clint (clint is in EPEL, but no new version of pygments in
> EPEL/CentOS-Extras/CentOS-Plus)
I want people to use pip to install the cli because it's the easi
Thanks for bringing this back to the list Hugo! Hope you guys had a
good time at FOSDEM.
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:24 AM, Hugo Trippaers
wrote:
> Heya all,
>
> As Devid already mentioned we met up at Build-A-Cloud-Day in Ghent with Wido,
> Noa and a few other folks. During this day (with lots of
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:19 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>>> Alright, we will also have to implement upgrade paths and
>>> s/cloud-/cloudstack-/g in a lot of scripts.
>>>
I this the best we to demonstrate is by showing code, instead of a length
On 02/03/2013 08:34 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Hugo Trippaers
wrote:
Heya all,
As Devid already mentioned we met up at Build-A-Cloud-Day in Ghent with Wido,
Noa and a few other folks. During this day (with lots of nice talks) we had a
chance to sit down and dis
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:19 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>>> Alright, we will also have to implement upgrade paths and
>>> s/cloud-/cloudstack-/g in a lot of scripts.
>>>
I this the best we to demonstrate is by showing code, instead of a length
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:19 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>> Alright, we will also have to implement upgrade paths and
>> s/cloud-/cloudstack-/g in a lot of scripts.
>>
>>> I this the best we to demonstrate is by showing code, instead of a lengthy
>>> email ;-) All packages will have a directory in
>>
> Alright, we will also have to implement upgrade paths and
> s/cloud-/cloudstack-/g in a lot of scripts.
>
>> I this the best we to demonstrate is by showing code, instead of a lengthy
>> email ;-) All packages will have a directory in /usr/share/cloudstack-%{name}
>
> Why not /usr/share/cloudsta
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Hugo Trippaers
wrote:
> Heya all,
>
> As Devid already mentioned we met up at Build-A-Cloud-Day in Ghent with Wido,
> Noa and a few other folks. During this day (with lots of nice talks) we had a
> chance to sit down and discuss packaging. Something that Noa, Wid
51 matches
Mail list logo
