Re: Virtual Routers and ARP handling

2012-08-13 Thread Kelceydamage@bbits
No luck. There is only a single host(router) that is on the same network(VLAN) as the VR. I have zero issues with centOS hosts acting as VRs. Only the built in VR does this. Messages is clean. I am still scratching my head in this one. It seams build specific to the built-in VR. I will try a

Re: Virtual Routers and ARP handling

2012-08-12 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
Anything in /var/log/messages at all? Does this link help: http://www.serveradminblog.com/2011/02/neighbour-table-overflow-sysctl-conf -tunning/ On 8/9/12 8:54 AM, "Kelceydamage@bbits" wrote: >Not often at all. I simply set the unsolicited requests to 30s to prove >out. default is os default ce

Re: Virtual Routers and ARP handling

2012-08-09 Thread Kelceydamage@bbits
Not often at all. I simply set the unsolicited requests to 30s to prove out. default is os default centos 6.2. All the IPs share the same MAC and the gateway should not be "moving". Again, no issues from a centos guest using it directly as a gateway. Issues only when the VR is using it as a gat

RE: Virtual Routers and ARP handling

2012-08-09 Thread Venkata SwamyBabu Budumuru
First question I have is : how often your gateway cluster results in unsolicited ARP broadcast i.e. how quickly the gateway is moving ? -Original Message- From: Kelcey Damage [mailto:m...@kelceydamage.com] Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 12:15 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org S