Re: Regarding Cpu and memory overcommit feature.

2013-02-05 Thread Bharat Kumar
Hi Prachi, When I said actual I was referring to the minimum memory available to a VM. Bharat. On Feb 6, 2013, at 1:11 AM, Prachi Damle wrote: > Hi Bharat / Abhi, > > Even currently we always store actuals in the DB in op_host_capacity table. > During allocation, the overprovisioning ratios

Re: Regarding Cpu and memory overcommit feature.

2013-02-05 Thread Abhinandan Prateek
Bharat, This is a 4.1 feature. Please update the progress and the git commit sent for review in jira. -abhi On 05/02/13 12:14 PM, "Abhinandan Prateek" wrote: > >On 01/02/13 4:22 PM, "Bharat Kumar" wrote: > >>Hi All, >> >>I have made changes to the way capacity is calculated in Cloudstack , >

Re: Regarding Cpu and memory overcommit feature.

2013-02-05 Thread Abhinandan Prateek
Prachi, For Hypervisor not supporting overcommit, the cluster of those hypervisors cannot have a overcommit. It should not affect the current capacity calculation. Bharat will be able to elaborate on this. -abhi On 06/02/13 1:11 AM, "Prachi Damle" wrote: >Hi Bharat / Abhi, > >Even currently w

RE: Regarding Cpu and memory overcommit feature.

2013-02-05 Thread Prachi Damle
Hi Bharat / Abhi, Even currently we always store actuals in the DB in op_host_capacity table. During allocation, the overprovisioning ratios are applied dynamically to find the overprovisioned "total" capacity. So it's good that even the new way will follow that. >Major differences are >1.) In