Posted the review for this https://reviews.apache.org/r/8993/
> -Original Message-
> From: Koushik Das [mailto:koushik@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 11:15 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Inconsistent way to store host H
Created CLOUDSTACK-988
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 4:58 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Inconsistent way to store host HV version in db
>
> Just because it&#
itrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 1:40 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Inconsistent way to store host HV version in db
>
> Yes it can be stored in host_details table but then given that all hosts in a
> cluster have same version the data woul
some validation based on HV version.
> -Original Message-
> From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 2:51 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Inconsistent way to store host HV version in db
>
> Storin
Storing it in host_details table with the "product_version" name should be
fine. For XS, that is where it is kept and it'll make sure it is consistent for
other hypervisors too.
Just for my understanding, what is the requirement for which you now need to
keep the Vmware host version details?
