RE: HA question

il.com >Subject: Re: HA question > >I guess this would have to be tested on other hypervisors as well. > >Unfortunately I get a lot of XS answers, and very few others. > >Thanks for the tip Clayton I'll add this to the wiki section once it's up. > >Sent from my

Re: HA question

I guess this would have to be tested on other hypervisors as well. Unfortunately I get a lot of XS answers, and very few others. Thanks for the tip Clayton I'll add this to the wiki section once it's up. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 28, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Clayton Weise wrote: >> I would imagine

RE: HA question

> I would imagine it's best to leverage on the underlying hypervisors' HA > mechanisms, configured oud-of-band of cloudstack. I find cloudstacks > implementation a little laggy compared to the paid for variety. CloudStack > does a well enough job to figure out which host the vm eventually lands on.

Re: HA question

> >> Regards >> Mice >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Kelceydamage@bbits [mailto:kel...@bbits.ca] >> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 3:24 PM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subj

Re: HA question

loudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: Re: HA question > >I could get one started. > >I've saved this thread, and I'll try to get some stuff up in the next >couple days. > >Sent from my iPhone > >On Feb 27, 2013, at

RE: HA question

...@bbits.ca] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 3:24 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: HA question I could get one started. I've saved this thread, and I'll try to get some stuff up in the next couple days. Sent from my iPho

Re: HA question

gt; periodically writes a timestamp on shared storage, if host network >>>> pingTimeOut happens, Cloudstack will investigate if 'storage heartbeat' >>>> timeout and if that's the case HA job will be launched for HA enabled >>>> VMs >>>> on

Re: HA question

n involves delta sync/ >>> investigators and fencers. >>> >>> -Mice >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Sanjeev Neelarapu [mailto:sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com] >>> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 1:21 PM >>> To:

Re: HA question

encers. >> >> -Mice >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Sanjeev Neelarapu [mailto:sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com] >> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 1:21 PM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; kdam...@apache.org >> Subject: RE: HA questi

RE: HA question

> -Original Message- > From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kan...@citrix.com] > Sent: 28 February 2013 10:36 > To: kdam...@apache.org; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: HA question > > Hi Kelcey, > > At the risk of stating the obvious, I just wi

Re: HA question

> > -Mice > > -Original Message- > From: Sanjeev Neelarapu [mailto:sanjeev.neelar...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 1:21 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; kdam...@apache.org > Subject: RE: HA question > > Hi Hari, > > AFAIK

RE: HA question

t: Thursday, February 28, 2013 1:21 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; kdam...@apache.org Subject: RE: HA question Hi Hari, AFAIK, in CloudStack if a host crashes CloudStack would detect the host as down after pingTimeout interval. CloudStack does not reduce the available capacity bec

RE: HA question

. Thanks, Sanjeev -Original Message- From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kan...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 10:36 AM To: kdam...@apache.org; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: HA question Hi Kelcey, At the risk of stating the obvious, I just wish to re-iterate my

RE: HA question

Hari -Original Message- From: Kelcey Damage (BT) [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com] On Behalf Of kdam...@apache.org Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 8:51 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Hari Kannan Subject: RE: HA question So it's safe to conclude that HA while

RE: HA question

.com] >Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 8:46 PM >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >Cc: Hari Kannan >Subject: RE: HA question > >For VMware, CloudStack uses native HA provided by VMware. >VMware provides HA at the level of cluster. > >Regards, >Sateesh > >&g

RE: HA question

Cc: Hari Kannan > Subject: Re: HA question > > CS has its own HA logic and doesn't use the native HA of the HV and so the > question for enabling the HA for hosts doesn't arise. This is true for XS. > For Vmware and KVM, I will let the guru's speak :) > > On 28/02/13

Re: HA question

st"), and restart the Management Server. Enter the value in the >>Host >>Tags field when adding the host(s) that you want to dedicate to >>HA-enabled >>VMs. >> >>Hari >> >>From: Kelcey Damage (BT) [mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com] >>Sent:

RE: HA question

:25 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Hari Kannan Subject: RE: HA question Thanks that’s awesome, but not quite the answer I was looking for. To better phrase my question, if the cluster is the basic unit of availability, when hosts are enabled for HA, must all hosts in the cluster be

RE: HA question

o: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: RE: HA question > >Hi Kelsey, > >HA is at 2 levels – VMs can be marked HA. In addition, you can mark some >hosts as reserved for “Dedicated” HA hosts. Quoting from the manual, the >dedicated HA option is set through a special host tag w

RE: HA question

mailto:kel...@backbonetechnology.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 8:00 PM To: CloudStack dev list Subject: RE: HA question Hi, I can’t remember, do we enable HA on a per host basis, or on a per cluster basis? Thanks. [cid:image001.png@01CE1524.FA0D61B0]Kelcey Damage Infrastructure Systems

RE: HA question

Hi, I can’t remember, do we enable HA on a per host basis, or on a per cluster basis? Thanks. http://www.backbone.gr/media/backbone_symbol1.pngKelcey Damage Infrastructure Systems Architect www.backbonetechnology.com