RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target

2013-01-09 Thread Sangeetha Hariharan
@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target Not really.. we don't support it today, as I understand.. Hari -Original Message- From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 12:08 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apach

RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target

2013-01-04 Thread Hari Kannan
Not really.. we don't support it today, as I understand.. Hari -Original Message- From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 12:08 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target Hari, Is th

RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target

2013-01-04 Thread Alex Huang
anuary 04, 2013 8:45 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target > > Hi Edison > > I don't think we have the option of saying that if you want this feature, a > zone has to have only one hypervisor type - not only

RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target

2013-01-04 Thread Edison Su
> -Original Message- > From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kan...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 8:45 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target > > Hi Edison > > I don't think we have

RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target

2013-01-04 Thread Hari Kannan
:21 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target Don't get things tooo complicated, let's make the simple thing work: One hypervisor in one zone, with one or multiple zone-wide primary storages. Without any special configurations, NFS/ceph + KVM

RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target

2013-01-03 Thread Edison Su
From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kan...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 2:35 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target > > Actually, let me clarify my original question, as re-reading it seems like it >

Re: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target

2013-01-03 Thread Marcus Sorensen
r that does NOT have shared zone-wide > primary store (or vice-versa), we still may have to resort to the double > copy as is done today - > > Hari > > -Original Message- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2013 1:51 PM >

RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target

2013-01-03 Thread Hari Kannan
Hari -Original Message- From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2013 1:51 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target > -Original Message- > From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kan...@citr

RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target

2013-01-03 Thread Edison Su
> -Original Message- > From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kan...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 1:46 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target > > Hi Alex, Chip, > > That

RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target

2013-01-03 Thread Alex Huang
> -Original Message- > From: Hari Kannan [mailto:hari.kan...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 1:46 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target > > Hi Alex, Chip, > > That

RE: [DISCUSS] Zone-wide primary storage target

2013-01-03 Thread Hari Kannan
Hi Alex, Chip, That's easy, I will change the name :-) @ Alex, I wasn't explicitly expecting co-existence of zone-wide primary storage and a "local" (cluster-wide only) primary storage. It seems you have assumed that would be a basic requirement, just wanted to confirm. If that were the case,