RE: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional thoughts

2012-08-24 Thread Hugo Trippaers
> Cheers, > > Hugo > > -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 3:19 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some > additional thoughts > >

Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional thoughts

2012-08-21 Thread Mice Xia
; -Original Message- > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 3:19 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional thoughts > > On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Tamas Monos

RE: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional thoughts

2012-08-21 Thread Hugo Trippaers
://reviews.apache.org/r/5804/ What to do? Cheers, Hugo -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 3:19 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional thoughts On Fri, Aug 10

Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional thoughts

2012-08-10 Thread David Nalley
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 6:51 AM, Tamas Monos wrote: > Hi, > > Do vmware libraries really need to be removed and re-added manually? > Could ASF not acquire permission from Vmware to redistribute their freely > available sdk for this project? > This 4.0 would be the first big ASF release and you wa

RE: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional thoughts

2012-08-10 Thread Tamas Monos
Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost Follow us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/veberhost -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: 09 August 2012 17:58 To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some

RE: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional thoughts

2012-08-09 Thread Sateesh Chodapuneedi
10, 2012 7:02 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional thoughts +1 I agree. Kelven On 8/9/12 4:39 PM, "Ewan Mellor" wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Will Chan [mailto:will.c...@citri

Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional thoughts

2012-08-09 Thread Kelven Yang
S] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional >> thoughts >> >> > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] >> > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 9:58 AM >> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was:

Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional thoughts

2012-08-09 Thread Adrian Cole
VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional >> thoughts >> >> > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] >> > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 9:58 AM >> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijav

RE: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional thoughts

2012-08-09 Thread Ewan Mellor
> -Original Message- > From: Will Chan [mailto:will.c...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:11 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional > thoughts > > > From: David N

Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional thoughts

2012-08-09 Thread Kelven Yang
ject: Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional >> thoughts >> Pardon my ignorance but why on earth would you NOT use the vendor >> SDK/API or even their CLI tools? The point of cloud automation is to >> sensibly and in the right order invoke the vendor

RE: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional thoughts

2012-08-09 Thread Will Chan
> From: Matthew Patton [mailto:mpat...@inforelay.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:20 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional > thoughts > Pardon my ignorance but why on earth would you NOT us

Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional thoughts

2012-08-09 Thread Matthew Patton
On Thu, 09 Aug 2012 13:10:47 -0400, Will Chan wrote: The issue with using some open source version of the vmware SDK is that it is not as well tested as the official one. Pardon my ignorance but why on earth would you NOT use the vendor SDK/API or even their CLI tools? The point of cloud a

RE: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional thoughts

2012-08-09 Thread Will Chan
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 9:58 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional > thoughts > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Will Chan wrote: > &g

Re: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional thoughts

2012-08-09 Thread David Nalley
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Will Chan wrote: > I prefer the same option "remove VMware SDK from the build" idea as well. I > wouldn't even go as far as adding in other libraries. If people want to use > VMWare, I am hoping we can just give them additional instructions on how to > do that

RE: [DISCUSS] VMware support was: Re: vijava - some additional thoughts

2012-08-09 Thread Will Chan
I prefer the same option "remove VMware SDK from the build" idea as well. I wouldn't even go as far as adding in other libraries. If people want to use VMWare, I am hoping we can just give them additional instructions on how to do that. Will > -Original Message- > From: Mice Xia [mai