On Jul 9, 2012, at 11:15 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> #Stance
> My personal stance is that the name should be 'Apache CloudStack' .
>
Mine as well... I see no reason to change and many reasons
for it to remain CloudStack.
Other podlings were required to rename, simply because they didn't
have the
]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 3:42 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] The CloudStack Brand
>
> Well put...think I completely agree on all the points. I can't think of a
> strong
> reason not to hold course. The only negative thing I can think of against the
> Cloud
Well put…think I completely agree on all the points. I can't think of a strong
reason not to hold course. The only negative thing I can think of against the
CloudStack brand is it's not as well known as the other IaaS project with the
strikingly similar name - hopefully we'll fix that. :)
John
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:15 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:41 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> > Hi folks:
> >
> > So one of the things that PMCs are charged with is maintaining the
> > brand of a project[1][2], and while it's a responsibility of the PMC,
> > I brought the discuss
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:41 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks:
>
> So one of the things that PMCs are charged with is maintaining the
> brand of a project[1][2], and while it's a responsibility of the PMC,
> I brought the discussion here to enable some broader conversations and
> to solicit inpu
