Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 11:04 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: License question
Hi Robert,
If you check the actual source, you will find ASLv2 headers.
The page you
On 05/18/2012 02:03 PM, David Nalley wrote:
Hi Robert,
If you check the actual source, you will find ASLv2 headers.
The page you discovered has a typo, 3.1 should be 3.0.1
And the license, EULA file is an artifact of Citrix commercial version, and
should be removed.
If no one steps up I will
In one of my project we build the project with maven (instate of ant) and
we have some plugin like http://code.google.com/p/maven-license-plugin/
So we can address licence issue module by module (automaticly add/change
licence on code header )
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 2:03 PM, David Nalley w
Hi Robert,
If you check the actual source, you will find ASLv2 headers.
The page you discovered has a typo, 3.1 should be 3.0.1
And the license, EULA file is an artifact of Citrix commercial version, and
should be removed.
If no one steps up I will happily defenestrate all of that Citrix li
I am not a lawyer, but
As I ran a diff between the 3.0.1 tarball and the recently released
3.0.2 tarball I stumbled across a license issue. Having already built
3.0.1 packages in OBS I might be in trouble already, but I didn't read
it all and figured I'd ask some questions first.
The sou
