RE: Internal db. id in VM instance/disk names

2013-01-25 Thread Koushik Das
, January 25, 2013 11:41 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Internal db. id in VM instance/disk names On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:17:10AM +0530, Koushik Das wrote: > Recently there were changes made in CS to replace internal ids with > uuid. The reason was to obfusca

RE: Internal db. id in VM instance/disk names

2013-01-25 Thread Kishan Kavala
-484a-8c3f-c102475cc724 . .. XenServer 0 ~kishan > -Original Message- > From: prasanna [mailto:srivatsav.prasa...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > Prasanna Santhanam > Sent: Friday, 25 January 2013 11:41 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re:

Re: Internal db. id in VM instance/disk names

2013-01-24 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:17:10AM +0530, Koushik Das wrote: > Recently there were changes made in CS to replace internal ids with > uuid. The reason was to obfuscate the increasing id sequences with > something random. But if you look at the vm instance name format > i---VM, it still has the inter

Internal db. id in VM instance/disk names

2013-01-24 Thread Koushik Das
Recently there were changes made in CS to replace internal ids with uuid. The reason was to obfuscate the increasing id sequences with something random. But if you look at the vm instance name format i---VM, it still has the internal ids in them. Should there be changes in the VM names as well