Re: System VM OS (was RE: IPtables deb in source repo)

2012-08-07 Thread Wido den Hollander
On 08/07/2012 08:26 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote: -Original Message- From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] Maybe we can switch to Ubuntu 12.04?: VMware supports it: http://partnerweb.vmware.com/GOSIG/Ubuntu_12_04.html Xen/KVM supports it by default. My recollection is that we picked

System VM OS (was RE: IPtables deb in source repo)

2012-08-07 Thread Kevin Kluge
> -Original Message- > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com] > > Maybe we can switch to Ubuntu 12.04?: > VMware supports it: > http://partnerweb.vmware.com/GOSIG/Ubuntu_12_04.html > Xen/KVM supports it by default. My recollection is that we picked Debian for stability and security.

RE: IPtables deb in source repo

2012-08-06 Thread Edison Su
gt; Subject: Re: IPtables deb in source repo > > Not knowing the effort involved, is it crazy to talk about an upgrade > of the system VM OS? > > - chip > > Sent from my iPhone. > > On Aug 3, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote: > > >> > >>

Re: IPtables deb in source repo

2012-08-04 Thread Chip Childers
Not knowing the effort involved, is it crazy to talk about an upgrade of the system VM OS? - chip Sent from my iPhone. On Aug 3, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote: >> >> I believe it is already in Debian wheezy, so this is actually a backport. >> Debian backports kernel for Squeeze broke som

RE: IPtables deb in source repo

2012-08-03 Thread Kevin Kluge
> > I believe it is already in Debian wheezy, so this is actually a backport. > Debian backports kernel for Squeeze broke something else (will have to dig it > up), so we couldn't use the backports kernel. > > What will break for folks is that: > - if they have a Ubuntu/Debian VM co-hosted on the

Re: IPtables deb in source repo

2012-08-03 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
com] >>> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 2:13 PM >>> To: CloudStack DeveloperList >>> Subject: Re: IPtables deb in source repo >>> >>> However this means that if someone wants to build a system vm >>> themselves >>> (to add new packages

Re: IPtables deb in source repo

2012-08-03 Thread David Nalley
k DeveloperList >> Subject: Re: IPtables deb in source repo >> >> However this means that if someone wants to build a system vm >> themselves >> (to add new packages for example), this fix will not be available. >> >> On

RE: IPtables deb in source repo

2012-08-03 Thread Edison Su
We can put the binary into somewhere, but in the source code. > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 2:13 PM > To: CloudStack DeveloperList > Subject: Re: IPtables deb in source repo > > Ho

Re: IPtables deb in source repo

2012-08-03 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
:da...@gnsa.us] >> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 1:09 PM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: IPtables deb in source repo >> >> Hi folks: >> >> There's a deb for what I assume is a forked/modified copy of iptables >> in source

RE: IPtables deb in source repo

2012-08-03 Thread Edison Su
...@gnsa.us] > Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 1:09 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: IPtables deb in source repo > > Hi folks: > > There's a deb for what I assume is a forked/modified copy of iptables > in source: > > patches/systemvm/debia

IPtables deb in source repo

2012-08-03 Thread David Nalley
Hi folks: There's a deb for what I assume is a forked/modified copy of iptables in source: patches/systemvm/debian/iptables_1.4.8-3local1checksum1_i386.deb Why is it here?; what if any changes were made to this?; when this gets deleted (iptables is GPL), does it create any problems for generatin