gt;on KVM as well as LVMoISCSI on XenServer. I would imagine it would react
in
>a similar fashion to VMFS and VMware.
>>
>> -Clayton
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 20
d react in a similar fashion to VMFS and VMware.
>
> -Clayton
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 10:37 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: CS Administration Qu
I would imagine it would react in a similar
fashion to VMFS and VMware.
-Clayton
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tutkowski [mailto:mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 10:37 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: CS Administration Question
Hi,
Can
I favor adding a new volume and using LVM in the guest to make it appear as a
single data source for the end user.
Same with windows and merged drives, or multi-backed folders.
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 28, 2013, at 10:36 AM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone give me an idea wha
Hi,
Can someone give me an idea what a CS Admin might do when a volume begins
to reach its capacity? For example, let's say we start with a 100 GB iSCSI
volume. We create a storage repo for it in XenServer or a datastore for it
in VMware. When we're getting close to the 100 GB capacity, does he