RE: CS -> Spring

2012-08-18 Thread Darren Shepherd
Kelven, That makes sense. I'm not a committer so I'll probably be working off my github account, but I'll base my branch off of javelin. Darren > Original Message ---- > Subject: Re: CS -> Spring > From: Kelven Yang > Date: Sat, August 18, 2012

Re: CS -> Spring

2012-08-18 Thread Kelven Yang
or a decision. I hadn't >been following the mailing list most of the week and therefore wasn't >too sure what was up with that. > >Darren > > > > >> Original Message >> Subject: RE: CS -> Spring >> From: Alex Huang >> D

RE: CS -> Spring

2012-08-18 Thread Darren Shepherd
I hadn't been following the mailing list most of the week and therefore wasn't too sure what was up with that. Darren > Original Message ---- > Subject: RE: CS -> Spring > From: Alex Huang > Date: Sat, August 18, 2012 12:46 pm > To: "clouds

RE: CS -> Spring

2012-08-18 Thread Alex Huang
; From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:dar...@godaddy.com] > Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 10:16 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: CS -> Spring > > I'm going to be starting the effort of moving CloudStack to be Spring > managed as this is an absolute

CS -> Spring

2012-08-18 Thread Darren Shepherd
I'm going to be starting the effort of moving CloudStack to be Spring managed as this is an absolute must for me (and my day job). I wanted to share some of the high level points and the scope as I see it today. Moving to Spring should not impact much code (except swapping annotations in a lot of