Since I heared no big objections for now, I created
an issue CLOUDSTACK-1638 and created a patch in
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9871/
The patch is intended to be a minimum change, but I'm
thinking that we should stop the migration if plugin
failed to handle the operation...
# NetworkManager inter
(2013/02/26 17:21), Dave Cahill wrote:
Hi,
Anybody else (Hugo? Dave Cahill?) want to chime in?
I have noticed some issues with the NetworkManager's treatment of non-Guest
NICs / VMs - see for example thread [1].
Kawai-san - could you provide more info on the type of traffic (Guest
only?) a
Thanks for reply :
(2013/02/26 17:10), Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
On 2/25/13 6:55 PM, "KAWAI Hiroaki" wrote:
Hi, I'm writing a network plugin that tracks the location
of the virtual machine (and then reacts).
There're interface methods in NetworkGuru and NetworkElement
that can be used for this
Hi,
> Anybody else (Hugo? Dave Cahill?) want to chime in?
I have noticed some issues with the NetworkManager's treatment of non-Guest
NICs / VMs - see for example thread [1].
Kawai-san - could you provide more info on the type of traffic (Guest
only?) and VMs (Guest only, or System VMs too) yo
On 2/25/13 6:55 PM, "KAWAI Hiroaki" wrote:
>Hi, I'm writing a network plugin that tracks the location
>of the virtual machine (and then reacts).
>
>There're interface methods in NetworkGuru and NetworkElement
>that can be used for this purpose.
>
>The location of the virtual machine is provided
Hi, I'm writing a network plugin that tracks the location
of the virtual machine (and then reacts).
There're interface methods in NetworkGuru and NetworkElement
that can be used for this purpose.
The location of the virtual machine is provided by
DeployDestination, which will be passed in Network
