> This is a fantastic, multi-leveled proposal with lots of implications. I
> think that I'm going to keep my comments to the high-level intent of the
> document, and ask that we re-initiate discussions on the implementation
> details individually. In general, I'm highly supportive of this!
>
> S
> Could you elaborate a bit on the new deployment plans (slides 19-21). It
> seems that you are aiming for more independent zones and a more reliable
> management layer, but I could not quite picture how you would actually
> deploy this.
The storyboard for deployment will look like this.
- Deploy
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> I sent out an email a couple of months ago about the need to refactor
> CloudStack into small pieces. At the time, the overall sentiment was the
> community is heavily invested in releasing 4.0 and this should be brought
> up post 4.0. Now tha
Alex,
I looked at the powerpoint.
Could you elaborate a bit on the new deployment plans (slides 19-21). It seems
that you are aiming for more independent zones and a more reliable management
layer, but I could not quite picture how you would actually deploy this.
On the componentization: I th
Hi Alex,
Just wanted to let you know that I'm going to take a good look at this.
Wido
On 11/09/2012 07:12 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
I sent out an email a couple of months ago about the need to refactor
CloudStack into small pieces. At the time, the overall sentiment was the
community is heavily
I have updated the page to include a pdf for those who don't have power point.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 10:12 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [RFC] Refactori
I sent out an email a couple of months ago about the need to refactor
CloudStack into small pieces. At the time, the overall sentiment was the
community is heavily invested in releasing 4.0 and this should be brought up
post 4.0. Now that 4.0 has been released, I like to bring this up again.
