Re: [MERGE] Runbook

2013-02-13 Thread Ahmad Emneina
The runbook was a super valuable effort. Id love to see it carried forward in its new incarnation. +1 On Feb 13, 2013 7:55 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: > +1 Go for it > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Chip Childers > wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:18:42AM -0500, David Nalley wrote: > >> Hi

Re: [MERGE] Runbook

2013-02-13 Thread Rohit Yadav
+1 Go for it On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:18:42AM -0500, David Nalley wrote: >> Hi folks: >> >> If I receive no objection in the next few days, I plan on merging the >> runbook branch changes into master, 4.1, and 4.0. >> >> For master and 4.1

Re: [MERGE] Runbook

2013-02-13 Thread Chip Childers
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:18:42AM -0500, David Nalley wrote: > Hi folks: > > If I receive no objection in the next few days, I plan on merging the > runbook branch changes into master, 4.1, and 4.0. > > For master and 4.1 the content isn't perfect, but its a bit better > than what is currently t

RE: [MERGE] Runbook

2013-02-13 Thread Pranav Saxena
+1 . Great work David ! -Original Message- From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 7:49 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [MERGE] Runbook Hi folks: If I receive no objection in the next few days, I plan on merging the runbook

[MERGE] Runbook

2013-02-13 Thread David Nalley
Hi folks: If I receive no objection in the next few days, I plan on merging the runbook branch changes into master, 4.1, and 4.0. For master and 4.1 the content isn't perfect, but its a bit better than what is currently there. I'll also plan on publishing this under the title "Quick Install Guid