Re: [Discuss] Support for non-contiguous vlan ranges.

2013-03-14 Thread Bharat Kumar
If the remove fails add will also fail. Bharat. On Mar 13, 2013, at 11:26 AM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: > If the remove fails, will the add still succeed? > > On 3/5/13 11:20 PM, "Bharat Kumar" wrote: > >> The changes will be atomic. >> before removing any range we need to check if any of the

Re: [Discuss] Support for non-contiguous vlan ranges.

2013-03-12 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
If the remove fails, will the add still succeed? On 3/5/13 11:20 PM, "Bharat Kumar" wrote: >The changes will be atomic. >before removing any range we need to check if any of the vlans in the >range are in use. The operation will fail if some vlans in the remove >range are in use. >i.e. if E=100-

Re: [Discuss] Support for non-contiguous vlan ranges.

2013-03-05 Thread Bharat Kumar
The changes will be atomic. before removing any range we need to check if any of the vlans in the range are in use. The operation will fail if some vlans in the remove range are in use. i.e. if E=100-200 (existing) U(used)=101,121,131 and remove=100-201 we do not remove this range as 101,121, and

Re: [Discuss] Support for non-contiguous vlan ranges.

2013-03-05 Thread Chiradeep Vittal
Will the changes be atomic? All or nothing? Existing range E= 100-200, in use U=101,121,131 New request: add=201-301, remove=100-201 Or E = 100-200, U=110-120 A = 150-250, R=100-149 etc On 1/24/13 10:13 PM, "Bharat Kumar" wrote: > Thank you Manan for pointing this out i intended to say multi

Re: [Discuss] Support for non-contiguous vlan ranges.

2013-01-24 Thread Bharat Kumar
Thank you Manan for pointing this out i intended to say multiple Vlans not IPs. I corrected it in the FS. Bharat On Jan 25, 2013, at 4:25 AM, Manan Shah wrote: > Bharat, I reviewed the FS and I have the following question. It states > thatÅ  > > Admin can update the vlan range after creation

Re: [Discuss] Support for non-contiguous vlan ranges.

2013-01-24 Thread Manan Shah
Bharat, I reviewed the FS and I have the following question. It states thatÅ  Admin can update the vlan range after creation or can add multiple non contiguous vlan ranges while creating a zone. This can be done by changing the UpdatephysicalNetwork api. It allows only extending of the vlan. we pla

Re: [Discuss] Support for non-contiguous vlan ranges.

2013-01-04 Thread Manan Shah
Bharat, I have created a JIRA ticket as well as requirements page for this requirement. Please leverage that. Regards, Manan Shah On 1/3/13 10:33 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: >On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 11:37:28AM +0530, Bharat Kumar wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> In cloudstack we specify the vlan

Re: [Discuss] Support for non-contiguous vlan ranges.

2013-01-03 Thread Prasanna Santhanam
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 11:37:28AM +0530, Bharat Kumar wrote: > Hi all, > > In cloudstack we specify the vlan ranges in advanced zone. These > vlans are used while creating the guest networks. Presently we can > add only one continuos vlan range. There is no way to add non > contiguous vlan range

[Discuss] Support for non-contiguous vlan ranges.

2013-01-03 Thread Bharat Kumar
Hi all, In cloudstack we specify the vlan ranges in advanced zone. These vlans are used while creating the guest networks. Presently we can add only one continuos vlan range. There is no way to add non contiguous vlan ranges. So we propose to add a feature to support adding multiple vlan rang